Evaluation of a new reagent strip rapid urease test for detection of Helicobacter pylori infection

M. M. Yousfi, H. M T El-Zimaity, R. M. Genta, D. Y. Graham

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Rapid urease tests are commonly used as a convenient method to detect Helicobacter pylori infection. Our previous experiments demonstrated enhanced efficacy of agar gel rapid urease test compared with reagent strip rapid urease tests. We evaluated the efficacy of PyloriTek, a new reagent strip rapid test for detecting H. pylori infection. Methods: Gastric antral mucosal biopsy specimens were obtained for comparison between agar gel rapid urease tests and PyloriTek (200 specimens). The rapid urease test to be used first was selected randomly. H. pylori status was determined using the Genta stain. Culture was performed to confirm H. pylori status when false rapid urease tests were suspected. Results: One hundred patients were studied; 68 had H. pylori infection. There were two false-negative and one false-positive PyloriTek when scored at 1 hour, compared with only one false- positive and no false-negative tests at 2 hours. With the agar gel rapid urease tests, there were no false-positive tests and 5 false-negative tests when scored at 1 hour, 2 false-negative tests at 12 hours and 1 at 24 hours; there were no false-positive tests. At 1 hour, 3% (95% CI = 1% to 9%) of PyloriTek tests had an erroneous categorization of H. pylori status compared with 5% for the agar gel rapid urease tests (95% CI = 1.6% to 11%) (p > 0.7). Conclusion: The new reagent strip rapid urease test, PyloriTek, is rapid and comparable in accuracy to agar gel rapid urease tests for detecting H. pylori infection.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)519-522
Number of pages4
JournalGastrointestinal Endoscopy
Volume44
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 1996

Fingerprint

Reagent Strips
Urease
Helicobacter Infections
Helicobacter pylori
Agar
Gels
Stomach
Coloring Agents

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Evaluation of a new reagent strip rapid urease test for detection of Helicobacter pylori infection. / Yousfi, M. M.; El-Zimaity, H. M T; Genta, R. M.; Graham, D. Y.

In: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Vol. 44, No. 5, 1996, p. 519-522.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Yousfi, M. M. ; El-Zimaity, H. M T ; Genta, R. M. ; Graham, D. Y. / Evaluation of a new reagent strip rapid urease test for detection of Helicobacter pylori infection. In: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 1996 ; Vol. 44, No. 5. pp. 519-522.
@article{cbc8f0cb3eb845b8a9b97da761ae5713,
title = "Evaluation of a new reagent strip rapid urease test for detection of Helicobacter pylori infection",
abstract = "Background: Rapid urease tests are commonly used as a convenient method to detect Helicobacter pylori infection. Our previous experiments demonstrated enhanced efficacy of agar gel rapid urease test compared with reagent strip rapid urease tests. We evaluated the efficacy of PyloriTek, a new reagent strip rapid test for detecting H. pylori infection. Methods: Gastric antral mucosal biopsy specimens were obtained for comparison between agar gel rapid urease tests and PyloriTek (200 specimens). The rapid urease test to be used first was selected randomly. H. pylori status was determined using the Genta stain. Culture was performed to confirm H. pylori status when false rapid urease tests were suspected. Results: One hundred patients were studied; 68 had H. pylori infection. There were two false-negative and one false-positive PyloriTek when scored at 1 hour, compared with only one false- positive and no false-negative tests at 2 hours. With the agar gel rapid urease tests, there were no false-positive tests and 5 false-negative tests when scored at 1 hour, 2 false-negative tests at 12 hours and 1 at 24 hours; there were no false-positive tests. At 1 hour, 3{\%} (95{\%} CI = 1{\%} to 9{\%}) of PyloriTek tests had an erroneous categorization of H. pylori status compared with 5{\%} for the agar gel rapid urease tests (95{\%} CI = 1.6{\%} to 11{\%}) (p > 0.7). Conclusion: The new reagent strip rapid urease test, PyloriTek, is rapid and comparable in accuracy to agar gel rapid urease tests for detecting H. pylori infection.",
author = "Yousfi, {M. M.} and El-Zimaity, {H. M T} and Genta, {R. M.} and Graham, {D. Y.}",
year = "1996",
doi = "10.1016/S0016-5107(96)70001-9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "44",
pages = "519--522",
journal = "Gastrointestinal Endoscopy",
issn = "0016-5107",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of a new reagent strip rapid urease test for detection of Helicobacter pylori infection

AU - Yousfi, M. M.

AU - El-Zimaity, H. M T

AU - Genta, R. M.

AU - Graham, D. Y.

PY - 1996

Y1 - 1996

N2 - Background: Rapid urease tests are commonly used as a convenient method to detect Helicobacter pylori infection. Our previous experiments demonstrated enhanced efficacy of agar gel rapid urease test compared with reagent strip rapid urease tests. We evaluated the efficacy of PyloriTek, a new reagent strip rapid test for detecting H. pylori infection. Methods: Gastric antral mucosal biopsy specimens were obtained for comparison between agar gel rapid urease tests and PyloriTek (200 specimens). The rapid urease test to be used first was selected randomly. H. pylori status was determined using the Genta stain. Culture was performed to confirm H. pylori status when false rapid urease tests were suspected. Results: One hundred patients were studied; 68 had H. pylori infection. There were two false-negative and one false-positive PyloriTek when scored at 1 hour, compared with only one false- positive and no false-negative tests at 2 hours. With the agar gel rapid urease tests, there were no false-positive tests and 5 false-negative tests when scored at 1 hour, 2 false-negative tests at 12 hours and 1 at 24 hours; there were no false-positive tests. At 1 hour, 3% (95% CI = 1% to 9%) of PyloriTek tests had an erroneous categorization of H. pylori status compared with 5% for the agar gel rapid urease tests (95% CI = 1.6% to 11%) (p > 0.7). Conclusion: The new reagent strip rapid urease test, PyloriTek, is rapid and comparable in accuracy to agar gel rapid urease tests for detecting H. pylori infection.

AB - Background: Rapid urease tests are commonly used as a convenient method to detect Helicobacter pylori infection. Our previous experiments demonstrated enhanced efficacy of agar gel rapid urease test compared with reagent strip rapid urease tests. We evaluated the efficacy of PyloriTek, a new reagent strip rapid test for detecting H. pylori infection. Methods: Gastric antral mucosal biopsy specimens were obtained for comparison between agar gel rapid urease tests and PyloriTek (200 specimens). The rapid urease test to be used first was selected randomly. H. pylori status was determined using the Genta stain. Culture was performed to confirm H. pylori status when false rapid urease tests were suspected. Results: One hundred patients were studied; 68 had H. pylori infection. There were two false-negative and one false-positive PyloriTek when scored at 1 hour, compared with only one false- positive and no false-negative tests at 2 hours. With the agar gel rapid urease tests, there were no false-positive tests and 5 false-negative tests when scored at 1 hour, 2 false-negative tests at 12 hours and 1 at 24 hours; there were no false-positive tests. At 1 hour, 3% (95% CI = 1% to 9%) of PyloriTek tests had an erroneous categorization of H. pylori status compared with 5% for the agar gel rapid urease tests (95% CI = 1.6% to 11%) (p > 0.7). Conclusion: The new reagent strip rapid urease test, PyloriTek, is rapid and comparable in accuracy to agar gel rapid urease tests for detecting H. pylori infection.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029988213&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029988213&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0016-5107(96)70001-9

DO - 10.1016/S0016-5107(96)70001-9

M3 - Article

C2 - 8934154

AN - SCOPUS:0029988213

VL - 44

SP - 519

EP - 522

JO - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

JF - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

SN - 0016-5107

IS - 5

ER -