Evaluation of a web-based family medicine case library for self-directed learning in a third-year clerkship

Jay B. Morrow, Dan Sepdham, Laura Snell, Carolyn Lindeman, Alison Dobbie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Web-based cases are well accepted by medical students and enable faculty to deliver equivalent educational experiences to all students. A 2009 literature search revealed no study investigating student use patterns of Web-based case libraries for self-directed learning. We investigated third-year students' use of a Web-based case program for self-directed learning in a family medicine clerkship. Methods: We analyzed Design A Case usage patterns of 210 medical students during academic year 2008-2009. We compared board score differences between these students and those from the previous 5 years who did not use Design A Case. We analyzed data from a 13-item survey, administered to a subgroup of 85 students, about the strengths, weaknesses, and acceptability of the program. Results: Students completed, on average, four cases, which was beyond the requirement of three. They reported that the content was highly relevant to cases they saw in clinic. Almost 75% preferred the self-directed Web-based learning over didactics, and most (64%) felt they learned more electronically. Use of the cases was associated with equivalent Board scores versus didactic lectures. Conclusions: In our setting, self-directed learning using a Web-based case program was highly acceptable to students. Web-based cases may provide an option for family medicine educators who wish to deliver equivalent educational experiences across sites.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)496-500
Number of pages5
JournalFamily Medicine
Volume42
Issue number7
StatePublished - Jul 2010

Fingerprint

Libraries
Medicine
Learning
Students
Medical Students

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Family Practice

Cite this

Evaluation of a web-based family medicine case library for self-directed learning in a third-year clerkship. / Morrow, Jay B.; Sepdham, Dan; Snell, Laura; Lindeman, Carolyn; Dobbie, Alison.

In: Family Medicine, Vol. 42, No. 7, 07.2010, p. 496-500.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Morrow, Jay B. ; Sepdham, Dan ; Snell, Laura ; Lindeman, Carolyn ; Dobbie, Alison. / Evaluation of a web-based family medicine case library for self-directed learning in a third-year clerkship. In: Family Medicine. 2010 ; Vol. 42, No. 7. pp. 496-500.
@article{fb5189b4a9be42b1b6b69a43d024ba17,
title = "Evaluation of a web-based family medicine case library for self-directed learning in a third-year clerkship",
abstract = "Background and Objectives: Web-based cases are well accepted by medical students and enable faculty to deliver equivalent educational experiences to all students. A 2009 literature search revealed no study investigating student use patterns of Web-based case libraries for self-directed learning. We investigated third-year students' use of a Web-based case program for self-directed learning in a family medicine clerkship. Methods: We analyzed Design A Case usage patterns of 210 medical students during academic year 2008-2009. We compared board score differences between these students and those from the previous 5 years who did not use Design A Case. We analyzed data from a 13-item survey, administered to a subgroup of 85 students, about the strengths, weaknesses, and acceptability of the program. Results: Students completed, on average, four cases, which was beyond the requirement of three. They reported that the content was highly relevant to cases they saw in clinic. Almost 75{\%} preferred the self-directed Web-based learning over didactics, and most (64{\%}) felt they learned more electronically. Use of the cases was associated with equivalent Board scores versus didactic lectures. Conclusions: In our setting, self-directed learning using a Web-based case program was highly acceptable to students. Web-based cases may provide an option for family medicine educators who wish to deliver equivalent educational experiences across sites.",
author = "Morrow, {Jay B.} and Dan Sepdham and Laura Snell and Carolyn Lindeman and Alison Dobbie",
year = "2010",
month = "7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "42",
pages = "496--500",
journal = "Family Medicine",
issn = "0742-3225",
publisher = "Society of Teachers of Family Medicine",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of a web-based family medicine case library for self-directed learning in a third-year clerkship

AU - Morrow, Jay B.

AU - Sepdham, Dan

AU - Snell, Laura

AU - Lindeman, Carolyn

AU - Dobbie, Alison

PY - 2010/7

Y1 - 2010/7

N2 - Background and Objectives: Web-based cases are well accepted by medical students and enable faculty to deliver equivalent educational experiences to all students. A 2009 literature search revealed no study investigating student use patterns of Web-based case libraries for self-directed learning. We investigated third-year students' use of a Web-based case program for self-directed learning in a family medicine clerkship. Methods: We analyzed Design A Case usage patterns of 210 medical students during academic year 2008-2009. We compared board score differences between these students and those from the previous 5 years who did not use Design A Case. We analyzed data from a 13-item survey, administered to a subgroup of 85 students, about the strengths, weaknesses, and acceptability of the program. Results: Students completed, on average, four cases, which was beyond the requirement of three. They reported that the content was highly relevant to cases they saw in clinic. Almost 75% preferred the self-directed Web-based learning over didactics, and most (64%) felt they learned more electronically. Use of the cases was associated with equivalent Board scores versus didactic lectures. Conclusions: In our setting, self-directed learning using a Web-based case program was highly acceptable to students. Web-based cases may provide an option for family medicine educators who wish to deliver equivalent educational experiences across sites.

AB - Background and Objectives: Web-based cases are well accepted by medical students and enable faculty to deliver equivalent educational experiences to all students. A 2009 literature search revealed no study investigating student use patterns of Web-based case libraries for self-directed learning. We investigated third-year students' use of a Web-based case program for self-directed learning in a family medicine clerkship. Methods: We analyzed Design A Case usage patterns of 210 medical students during academic year 2008-2009. We compared board score differences between these students and those from the previous 5 years who did not use Design A Case. We analyzed data from a 13-item survey, administered to a subgroup of 85 students, about the strengths, weaknesses, and acceptability of the program. Results: Students completed, on average, four cases, which was beyond the requirement of three. They reported that the content was highly relevant to cases they saw in clinic. Almost 75% preferred the self-directed Web-based learning over didactics, and most (64%) felt they learned more electronically. Use of the cases was associated with equivalent Board scores versus didactic lectures. Conclusions: In our setting, self-directed learning using a Web-based case program was highly acceptable to students. Web-based cases may provide an option for family medicine educators who wish to deliver equivalent educational experiences across sites.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77954605699&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77954605699&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 20628923

AN - SCOPUS:77954605699

VL - 42

SP - 496

EP - 500

JO - Family Medicine

JF - Family Medicine

SN - 0742-3225

IS - 7

ER -