Evaluation of a web-based family medicine case library for self-directed learning in a third-year clerkship

Jay B. Morrow, Dan Sepdham, Laura Snell, Carolyn Lindeman, Alison Dobbie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Web-based cases are well accepted by medical students and enable faculty to deliver equivalent educational experiences to all students. A 2009 literature search revealed no study investigating student use patterns of Web-based case libraries for self-directed learning. We investigated third-year students' use of a Web-based case program for self-directed learning in a family medicine clerkship. Methods: We analyzed Design A Case usage patterns of 210 medical students during academic year 2008-2009. We compared board score differences between these students and those from the previous 5 years who did not use Design A Case. We analyzed data from a 13-item survey, administered to a subgroup of 85 students, about the strengths, weaknesses, and acceptability of the program. Results: Students completed, on average, four cases, which was beyond the requirement of three. They reported that the content was highly relevant to cases they saw in clinic. Almost 75% preferred the self-directed Web-based learning over didactics, and most (64%) felt they learned more electronically. Use of the cases was associated with equivalent Board scores versus didactic lectures. Conclusions: In our setting, self-directed learning using a Web-based case program was highly acceptable to students. Web-based cases may provide an option for family medicine educators who wish to deliver equivalent educational experiences across sites.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)496-500
Number of pages5
JournalFamily medicine
Volume42
Issue number7
StatePublished - Jul 1 2010

    Fingerprint

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Family Practice

Cite this