Evaluation of patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis who do not undergo aortic valve replacement: The potential role of subjectively overestimated operative risk

David S. Bach, Derrick Siao, Steven E. Girard, Claire Duvernoy, Benjamin D. McCallister, Sarah K. Gualano

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

235 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background-Some patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS) do not undergo aortic valve replacement (AVR) despite demonstrated symptomatic and survival advantages and despite unequivocal guideline recommendations for surgical evaluation. Methods and Results-In 3 large tertiary care institutions (university, Veterans Affairs, and private practice) in Washtenaw County, Mich, patients were identified with unrefuted echocardiography/Doppler evidence of severe AS during calendar year 2005. Medical records were retrospectively reviewed for symptoms, referral for AVR, calculated operative risk for AVR, and rationale as to why patients did not undergo valve replacement. Of 369 patients with severe AS, 191 (52%) did not undergo AVR. Of these, 126 (66%, 34% of total) had symptoms consistent with AS. The most common reasons cited for absent intervention were comorbidities with high operative risk (61 patients [48%]), patent refusal (24 patients [19%]), and symptoms unrelated to AS (24 patients [19%]). Operated patients had a lower Society of Thoracic Surgery-calculated perioperative mortality risk than unoperated patients (1.8% [interquartile range, 1.0 to 3.0%] versus 2.7% [interquartile range, 1.6 to 5.5%], P<0.001). However, 28 (24%) of 126 unoperated symptomatic patients had a calculated perioperative risk less than the median risk for patients who underwent AVR. Only 57 (30%) of 191 unoperated patients were evaluated by a cardiac surgeon. There were similar rates of intervention across practice settings, and similar rates of unoperated patients despite symptoms and low operative risk. Conclusions-One third of patients with severe AS are symptomatic but do not undergo AVR, with similar findings in multiple practice environments. For most unoperated patients, objectively calculated operative risks did not appear prohibitive. Despite this, a minority of unoperated patients were referred for surgical consultation. Some patients with severe symptomatic AS may be inappropriately denied access to potentially life-saving therapy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)533-539
Number of pages7
JournalCirculation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes
Volume2
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2009

Fingerprint

Aortic Valve Stenosis
Aortic Valve
Referral and Consultation
Doppler Echocardiography
Private Practice
Veterans
Tertiary Healthcare

Keywords

  • Aortic valve stenosis
  • Heart valves
  • Standards

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Evaluation of patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis who do not undergo aortic valve replacement : The potential role of subjectively overestimated operative risk. / Bach, David S.; Siao, Derrick; Girard, Steven E.; Duvernoy, Claire; McCallister, Benjamin D.; Gualano, Sarah K.

In: Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, Vol. 2, No. 6, 11.2009, p. 533-539.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bach, David S. ; Siao, Derrick ; Girard, Steven E. ; Duvernoy, Claire ; McCallister, Benjamin D. ; Gualano, Sarah K. / Evaluation of patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis who do not undergo aortic valve replacement : The potential role of subjectively overestimated operative risk. In: Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes. 2009 ; Vol. 2, No. 6. pp. 533-539.
@article{9771b97b2d1b49fb9dd795079750ee7e,
title = "Evaluation of patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis who do not undergo aortic valve replacement: The potential role of subjectively overestimated operative risk",
abstract = "Background-Some patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS) do not undergo aortic valve replacement (AVR) despite demonstrated symptomatic and survival advantages and despite unequivocal guideline recommendations for surgical evaluation. Methods and Results-In 3 large tertiary care institutions (university, Veterans Affairs, and private practice) in Washtenaw County, Mich, patients were identified with unrefuted echocardiography/Doppler evidence of severe AS during calendar year 2005. Medical records were retrospectively reviewed for symptoms, referral for AVR, calculated operative risk for AVR, and rationale as to why patients did not undergo valve replacement. Of 369 patients with severe AS, 191 (52{\%}) did not undergo AVR. Of these, 126 (66{\%}, 34{\%} of total) had symptoms consistent with AS. The most common reasons cited for absent intervention were comorbidities with high operative risk (61 patients [48{\%}]), patent refusal (24 patients [19{\%}]), and symptoms unrelated to AS (24 patients [19{\%}]). Operated patients had a lower Society of Thoracic Surgery-calculated perioperative mortality risk than unoperated patients (1.8{\%} [interquartile range, 1.0 to 3.0{\%}] versus 2.7{\%} [interquartile range, 1.6 to 5.5{\%}], P<0.001). However, 28 (24{\%}) of 126 unoperated symptomatic patients had a calculated perioperative risk less than the median risk for patients who underwent AVR. Only 57 (30{\%}) of 191 unoperated patients were evaluated by a cardiac surgeon. There were similar rates of intervention across practice settings, and similar rates of unoperated patients despite symptoms and low operative risk. Conclusions-One third of patients with severe AS are symptomatic but do not undergo AVR, with similar findings in multiple practice environments. For most unoperated patients, objectively calculated operative risks did not appear prohibitive. Despite this, a minority of unoperated patients were referred for surgical consultation. Some patients with severe symptomatic AS may be inappropriately denied access to potentially life-saving therapy.",
keywords = "Aortic valve stenosis, Heart valves, Standards",
author = "Bach, {David S.} and Derrick Siao and Girard, {Steven E.} and Claire Duvernoy and McCallister, {Benjamin D.} and Gualano, {Sarah K.}",
year = "2009",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.109.848259",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2",
pages = "533--539",
journal = "Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes",
issn = "1941-7713",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis who do not undergo aortic valve replacement

T2 - The potential role of subjectively overestimated operative risk

AU - Bach, David S.

AU - Siao, Derrick

AU - Girard, Steven E.

AU - Duvernoy, Claire

AU - McCallister, Benjamin D.

AU - Gualano, Sarah K.

PY - 2009/11

Y1 - 2009/11

N2 - Background-Some patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS) do not undergo aortic valve replacement (AVR) despite demonstrated symptomatic and survival advantages and despite unequivocal guideline recommendations for surgical evaluation. Methods and Results-In 3 large tertiary care institutions (university, Veterans Affairs, and private practice) in Washtenaw County, Mich, patients were identified with unrefuted echocardiography/Doppler evidence of severe AS during calendar year 2005. Medical records were retrospectively reviewed for symptoms, referral for AVR, calculated operative risk for AVR, and rationale as to why patients did not undergo valve replacement. Of 369 patients with severe AS, 191 (52%) did not undergo AVR. Of these, 126 (66%, 34% of total) had symptoms consistent with AS. The most common reasons cited for absent intervention were comorbidities with high operative risk (61 patients [48%]), patent refusal (24 patients [19%]), and symptoms unrelated to AS (24 patients [19%]). Operated patients had a lower Society of Thoracic Surgery-calculated perioperative mortality risk than unoperated patients (1.8% [interquartile range, 1.0 to 3.0%] versus 2.7% [interquartile range, 1.6 to 5.5%], P<0.001). However, 28 (24%) of 126 unoperated symptomatic patients had a calculated perioperative risk less than the median risk for patients who underwent AVR. Only 57 (30%) of 191 unoperated patients were evaluated by a cardiac surgeon. There were similar rates of intervention across practice settings, and similar rates of unoperated patients despite symptoms and low operative risk. Conclusions-One third of patients with severe AS are symptomatic but do not undergo AVR, with similar findings in multiple practice environments. For most unoperated patients, objectively calculated operative risks did not appear prohibitive. Despite this, a minority of unoperated patients were referred for surgical consultation. Some patients with severe symptomatic AS may be inappropriately denied access to potentially life-saving therapy.

AB - Background-Some patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS) do not undergo aortic valve replacement (AVR) despite demonstrated symptomatic and survival advantages and despite unequivocal guideline recommendations for surgical evaluation. Methods and Results-In 3 large tertiary care institutions (university, Veterans Affairs, and private practice) in Washtenaw County, Mich, patients were identified with unrefuted echocardiography/Doppler evidence of severe AS during calendar year 2005. Medical records were retrospectively reviewed for symptoms, referral for AVR, calculated operative risk for AVR, and rationale as to why patients did not undergo valve replacement. Of 369 patients with severe AS, 191 (52%) did not undergo AVR. Of these, 126 (66%, 34% of total) had symptoms consistent with AS. The most common reasons cited for absent intervention were comorbidities with high operative risk (61 patients [48%]), patent refusal (24 patients [19%]), and symptoms unrelated to AS (24 patients [19%]). Operated patients had a lower Society of Thoracic Surgery-calculated perioperative mortality risk than unoperated patients (1.8% [interquartile range, 1.0 to 3.0%] versus 2.7% [interquartile range, 1.6 to 5.5%], P<0.001). However, 28 (24%) of 126 unoperated symptomatic patients had a calculated perioperative risk less than the median risk for patients who underwent AVR. Only 57 (30%) of 191 unoperated patients were evaluated by a cardiac surgeon. There were similar rates of intervention across practice settings, and similar rates of unoperated patients despite symptoms and low operative risk. Conclusions-One third of patients with severe AS are symptomatic but do not undergo AVR, with similar findings in multiple practice environments. For most unoperated patients, objectively calculated operative risks did not appear prohibitive. Despite this, a minority of unoperated patients were referred for surgical consultation. Some patients with severe symptomatic AS may be inappropriately denied access to potentially life-saving therapy.

KW - Aortic valve stenosis

KW - Heart valves

KW - Standards

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77649205160&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77649205160&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.109.848259

DO - 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.109.848259

M3 - Article

C2 - 20031890

AN - SCOPUS:77649205160

VL - 2

SP - 533

EP - 539

JO - Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes

JF - Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes

SN - 1941-7713

IS - 6

ER -