Evaluation of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in the diagnosis of diaphragmatic injuries

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

70 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Injury to the diaphragm from penetrating or blunt thoracoabdominal trauma is notoriously difficult to diagnose. Chest radiography, computed tomography scan, contrast studies, diagnostic peritoneal lavage, and laparoscopy are inadequate; thus, celiotomy is commonly performed in patients with suspected diaphragmatic injury. We compared the diagnostic accuracy of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) with that of exploratory celiotomy in the evaluation of diaphragmatic and thoracoabdominal injury. Patients and methods: Hemodynamically stable patients admitted to a level I trauma center with blunt or penetrating injury to the lower chest or abdomen underwent VATS and subsequent celiotomy under the same general anesthetic. Intraoperative thoracoscopic findings were blinded to the abdominal surgeons. Results: Twenty-six patients were enrolled in the study over a 12-month period. Diaphragmatic injuries were identified in 8 patients (31%). Videothoracoscopy identified all eight injuries in these patients. Six of the 8 patients (75%) with diaphragmatic injuries sustained associated injury to intrathoracic or intra-abdominal organs. There was no mortality and no procedure-related morbidity. There were no missed injuries in patients who underwent VATS. Conclusions: Video-assisted thoracoscopy is a safe, expeditious, and accurate method of evaluating the diaphragm in injured patients, and is comparable in diagnostic accuracy to exploratory celiotomy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)628-631
Number of pages4
JournalThe American Journal of Surgery
Volume170
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 1995

Fingerprint

Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery
Wounds and Injuries
Diaphragm
Thorax
Peritoneal Lavage
Thoracoscopy
General Anesthetics
Trauma Centers
Radiography
Abdomen
Laparoscopy
Tomography
Morbidity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Evaluation of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in the diagnosis of diaphragmatic injuries. / Spann, James C.; Nwariaku, Fiemu E.; Wait, Michael.

In: The American Journal of Surgery, Vol. 170, No. 6, 1995, p. 628-631.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9e732afa89554573831d7cebadb2bc89,
title = "Evaluation of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in the diagnosis of diaphragmatic injuries",
abstract = "Background: Injury to the diaphragm from penetrating or blunt thoracoabdominal trauma is notoriously difficult to diagnose. Chest radiography, computed tomography scan, contrast studies, diagnostic peritoneal lavage, and laparoscopy are inadequate; thus, celiotomy is commonly performed in patients with suspected diaphragmatic injury. We compared the diagnostic accuracy of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) with that of exploratory celiotomy in the evaluation of diaphragmatic and thoracoabdominal injury. Patients and methods: Hemodynamically stable patients admitted to a level I trauma center with blunt or penetrating injury to the lower chest or abdomen underwent VATS and subsequent celiotomy under the same general anesthetic. Intraoperative thoracoscopic findings were blinded to the abdominal surgeons. Results: Twenty-six patients were enrolled in the study over a 12-month period. Diaphragmatic injuries were identified in 8 patients (31{\%}). Videothoracoscopy identified all eight injuries in these patients. Six of the 8 patients (75{\%}) with diaphragmatic injuries sustained associated injury to intrathoracic or intra-abdominal organs. There was no mortality and no procedure-related morbidity. There were no missed injuries in patients who underwent VATS. Conclusions: Video-assisted thoracoscopy is a safe, expeditious, and accurate method of evaluating the diaphragm in injured patients, and is comparable in diagnostic accuracy to exploratory celiotomy.",
author = "Spann, {James C.} and Nwariaku, {Fiemu E.} and Michael Wait",
year = "1995",
doi = "10.1016/S0002-9610(99)80030-0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "170",
pages = "628--631",
journal = "American Journal of Surgery",
issn = "0002-9610",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in the diagnosis of diaphragmatic injuries

AU - Spann, James C.

AU - Nwariaku, Fiemu E.

AU - Wait, Michael

PY - 1995

Y1 - 1995

N2 - Background: Injury to the diaphragm from penetrating or blunt thoracoabdominal trauma is notoriously difficult to diagnose. Chest radiography, computed tomography scan, contrast studies, diagnostic peritoneal lavage, and laparoscopy are inadequate; thus, celiotomy is commonly performed in patients with suspected diaphragmatic injury. We compared the diagnostic accuracy of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) with that of exploratory celiotomy in the evaluation of diaphragmatic and thoracoabdominal injury. Patients and methods: Hemodynamically stable patients admitted to a level I trauma center with blunt or penetrating injury to the lower chest or abdomen underwent VATS and subsequent celiotomy under the same general anesthetic. Intraoperative thoracoscopic findings were blinded to the abdominal surgeons. Results: Twenty-six patients were enrolled in the study over a 12-month period. Diaphragmatic injuries were identified in 8 patients (31%). Videothoracoscopy identified all eight injuries in these patients. Six of the 8 patients (75%) with diaphragmatic injuries sustained associated injury to intrathoracic or intra-abdominal organs. There was no mortality and no procedure-related morbidity. There were no missed injuries in patients who underwent VATS. Conclusions: Video-assisted thoracoscopy is a safe, expeditious, and accurate method of evaluating the diaphragm in injured patients, and is comparable in diagnostic accuracy to exploratory celiotomy.

AB - Background: Injury to the diaphragm from penetrating or blunt thoracoabdominal trauma is notoriously difficult to diagnose. Chest radiography, computed tomography scan, contrast studies, diagnostic peritoneal lavage, and laparoscopy are inadequate; thus, celiotomy is commonly performed in patients with suspected diaphragmatic injury. We compared the diagnostic accuracy of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) with that of exploratory celiotomy in the evaluation of diaphragmatic and thoracoabdominal injury. Patients and methods: Hemodynamically stable patients admitted to a level I trauma center with blunt or penetrating injury to the lower chest or abdomen underwent VATS and subsequent celiotomy under the same general anesthetic. Intraoperative thoracoscopic findings were blinded to the abdominal surgeons. Results: Twenty-six patients were enrolled in the study over a 12-month period. Diaphragmatic injuries were identified in 8 patients (31%). Videothoracoscopy identified all eight injuries in these patients. Six of the 8 patients (75%) with diaphragmatic injuries sustained associated injury to intrathoracic or intra-abdominal organs. There was no mortality and no procedure-related morbidity. There were no missed injuries in patients who underwent VATS. Conclusions: Video-assisted thoracoscopy is a safe, expeditious, and accurate method of evaluating the diaphragm in injured patients, and is comparable in diagnostic accuracy to exploratory celiotomy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028875863&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028875863&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0002-9610(99)80030-0

DO - 10.1016/S0002-9610(99)80030-0

M3 - Article

C2 - 7492015

AN - SCOPUS:0028875863

VL - 170

SP - 628

EP - 631

JO - American Journal of Surgery

JF - American Journal of Surgery

SN - 0002-9610

IS - 6

ER -