Evidence-based medicine, part 6. An introduction to critical appraisal of clinical practice guidelines

Brent W. Sanderlin, Nashila AbdulRahim

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article provides an introductory step-by-step process to appraise clinical practice guidelines. The authors introduce these principles using a systematic approach and case-based format. The process of assessing the validity of clinical practice guidelines, determining their importance, and applying them to an individual patient is reviewed. The concepts of study population homogeneity, equal treatment, and study completeness are discussed to help physicians determine the validity of clinical practice guidelines. Finally, information that is learned from the previously mentioned steps is applied to patient care. Study generalizability and the role of patient values, expectations, and concerns are also addressed. The skills learned from appraising clinical practice guidelines in the manner outlined provides a solid basis for life-long learning and improved patient care.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)321-324
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of the American Osteopathic Association
Volume107
Issue number8
StatePublished - Aug 1 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Evidence-Based Medicine
Practice Guidelines
Patient Care
Learning
Physicians
Population
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Evidence-based medicine, part 6. An introduction to critical appraisal of clinical practice guidelines. / Sanderlin, Brent W.; AbdulRahim, Nashila.

In: Journal of the American Osteopathic Association, Vol. 107, No. 8, 01.08.2007, p. 321-324.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{4449e05257b04367b2e6abce84f93227,
title = "Evidence-based medicine, part 6. An introduction to critical appraisal of clinical practice guidelines",
abstract = "This article provides an introductory step-by-step process to appraise clinical practice guidelines. The authors introduce these principles using a systematic approach and case-based format. The process of assessing the validity of clinical practice guidelines, determining their importance, and applying them to an individual patient is reviewed. The concepts of study population homogeneity, equal treatment, and study completeness are discussed to help physicians determine the validity of clinical practice guidelines. Finally, information that is learned from the previously mentioned steps is applied to patient care. Study generalizability and the role of patient values, expectations, and concerns are also addressed. The skills learned from appraising clinical practice guidelines in the manner outlined provides a solid basis for life-long learning and improved patient care.",
author = "Sanderlin, {Brent W.} and Nashila AbdulRahim",
year = "2007",
month = "8",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "107",
pages = "321--324",
journal = "The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association",
issn = "0098-6151",
publisher = "American Osteopathic Association",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evidence-based medicine, part 6. An introduction to critical appraisal of clinical practice guidelines

AU - Sanderlin, Brent W.

AU - AbdulRahim, Nashila

PY - 2007/8/1

Y1 - 2007/8/1

N2 - This article provides an introductory step-by-step process to appraise clinical practice guidelines. The authors introduce these principles using a systematic approach and case-based format. The process of assessing the validity of clinical practice guidelines, determining their importance, and applying them to an individual patient is reviewed. The concepts of study population homogeneity, equal treatment, and study completeness are discussed to help physicians determine the validity of clinical practice guidelines. Finally, information that is learned from the previously mentioned steps is applied to patient care. Study generalizability and the role of patient values, expectations, and concerns are also addressed. The skills learned from appraising clinical practice guidelines in the manner outlined provides a solid basis for life-long learning and improved patient care.

AB - This article provides an introductory step-by-step process to appraise clinical practice guidelines. The authors introduce these principles using a systematic approach and case-based format. The process of assessing the validity of clinical practice guidelines, determining their importance, and applying them to an individual patient is reviewed. The concepts of study population homogeneity, equal treatment, and study completeness are discussed to help physicians determine the validity of clinical practice guidelines. Finally, information that is learned from the previously mentioned steps is applied to patient care. Study generalizability and the role of patient values, expectations, and concerns are also addressed. The skills learned from appraising clinical practice guidelines in the manner outlined provides a solid basis for life-long learning and improved patient care.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34548640519&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34548640519&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Review article

C2 - 17785690

AN - SCOPUS:34548640519

VL - 107

SP - 321

EP - 324

JO - The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association

JF - The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association

SN - 0098-6151

IS - 8

ER -