TY - JOUR
T1 - Evidence for rapid faunal change in the early Miocene of East Africa based on revised biostratigraphic and radiometric dating of Bukwa, Uganda
AU - Cote, Susanne
AU - Kingston, John
AU - Deino, Alan
AU - Winkler, Alisa
AU - Kityo, Robert
AU - MacLatchy, Laura
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank the staff of the Uganda Museum, particularly Rose Mwanja and Amon Mugume, for research support and access to specimens under their care. Mrs. Mary Muungu, Dr. Fredrick Manthi, and Dr. Emma Mbua graciously provided access to comparative collections at the National Museums of Kenya. Alan Walker and Andrew Hill provided useful information on the history of Bukwa. Mercedes Gutierrez, Tab Rasmussen, William Sanders, and Pierre-Olivier Antoine provided expert advice on faunal identifications. Will Downs, Janet Nabaale, Moses Mafabi, Ezra Musiime, David Fox, Kirsten Jenkins, Betty Nalikka, Irisa Arney, Maire Malone, Sarah Musalizi, and Herbert Kasozi provided help in the field. Funding was provided by grants from the Wenner-Gren Foundation , the Leakey Foundation , the National Science Foundation ( BCS 0215877 , BCS 0456589 , BCS 1208369 , BCS 1241811 to LM; BCS 0524944 to SC; BCS 1241918 to AD), and by the Departments of Anthropology at Boston University and the University of Michigan and the Department of Anthropology and Archaeology at the University of Calgary. We thank all members of the NSF-funded REACHE Project (Research on East African Catarrhine and Hominoid Evolution). This is REACHE publication #7.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2018/3
Y1 - 2018/3
N2 - Field expeditions to Bukwa in the late 1960s and early 1970s established that the site had a small but diverse early Miocene fauna, including the catarrhine primate Limnopithecus legetet. Initial potassium-argon radiometric dating indicated that Bukwa was 22 Ma, making it the oldest of the East African early Miocene fossil localities known at the time. In contrast, the fauna collected from Bukwa was similar to other fossil localities in the region that were several million years younger. This discrepancy was never resolved, and due to the paucity of primate remains at the site, little subsequent research took place. We have collected new fossils at Bukwa, reanalyzed the existing fossil collections, and provided new radiometric dating. 40Ar/39Ar incremental heating ages on lavas bracketing the site indicate that the Bukwa fossils were deposited ∼19 Ma, roughly 3 Ma younger than the original radiometric age. Our radiometric dating results are corroborated by a thorough reanalysis of the faunal assemblage. Bukwa shares taxa with both stratigraphically older localities (Tinderet, Napak) and with stratigraphically younger localities (Kisingiri, Turkana Basin) perfectly corresponding to our revised radiometric age. This revised age for Bukwa is important because it indicates that significant faunal turnover may have occurred in East Africa between 20 and 19 Ma. Bukwa samples immigrant taxa such as large suids, large ruminants, and ochotonids that are absent from stratigraphically older but well-sampled localities in the region, such as Tinderet (∼20 Ma) and Napak (20 Ma). Further age refinements for Bukwa and the entire East African early Miocene sequence will help to constrain the timing of this faunal turnover event, of particular importance in paleoanthropology since this temporal sequence also provides us with what is currently our best window into the early evolution of cercopithecoid and hominoid primates.
AB - Field expeditions to Bukwa in the late 1960s and early 1970s established that the site had a small but diverse early Miocene fauna, including the catarrhine primate Limnopithecus legetet. Initial potassium-argon radiometric dating indicated that Bukwa was 22 Ma, making it the oldest of the East African early Miocene fossil localities known at the time. In contrast, the fauna collected from Bukwa was similar to other fossil localities in the region that were several million years younger. This discrepancy was never resolved, and due to the paucity of primate remains at the site, little subsequent research took place. We have collected new fossils at Bukwa, reanalyzed the existing fossil collections, and provided new radiometric dating. 40Ar/39Ar incremental heating ages on lavas bracketing the site indicate that the Bukwa fossils were deposited ∼19 Ma, roughly 3 Ma younger than the original radiometric age. Our radiometric dating results are corroborated by a thorough reanalysis of the faunal assemblage. Bukwa shares taxa with both stratigraphically older localities (Tinderet, Napak) and with stratigraphically younger localities (Kisingiri, Turkana Basin) perfectly corresponding to our revised radiometric age. This revised age for Bukwa is important because it indicates that significant faunal turnover may have occurred in East Africa between 20 and 19 Ma. Bukwa samples immigrant taxa such as large suids, large ruminants, and ochotonids that are absent from stratigraphically older but well-sampled localities in the region, such as Tinderet (∼20 Ma) and Napak (20 Ma). Further age refinements for Bukwa and the entire East African early Miocene sequence will help to constrain the timing of this faunal turnover event, of particular importance in paleoanthropology since this temporal sequence also provides us with what is currently our best window into the early evolution of cercopithecoid and hominoid primates.
KW - 40-argon 39-argon dating
KW - Africa
KW - Biochronology
KW - Faunal list
KW - Limnopithecus
KW - Neogene
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044267725&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85044267725&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jhevol.2017.12.001
DO - 10.1016/j.jhevol.2017.12.001
M3 - Article
C2 - 29477184
AN - SCOPUS:85044267725
VL - 116
SP - 95
EP - 107
JO - Journal of Human Evolution
JF - Journal of Human Evolution
SN - 0047-2484
ER -