Evidentiary standards for forensic anthropology

Angi M. Christensen, Christian M. Crowder

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

82 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

As issues of professional standards and error rates continue to be addressed in the courts, forensic anthropologists should be proactive by developing and adhering to professional standards of best practice. There has been recent increased awareness and interest in critically assessing some of the techniques used by forensic anthropologists, but issues such as validation, error rates, and professional standards have seldom been addressed. Here we explore the legal impetus for this trend and identify areas where we can improve regarding these issues. We also discuss the recent formation of a Scientific Working Group for Forensic Anthropology (SWGANTH), which was created with the purposes of encouraging discourse among anthropologists and developing and disseminating consensus guidelines for the practice of forensic anthropology. We believe it is possible and advisable for anthropologists to seek and espouse research and methodological techniques that meet higher standards to ensure quality and consistency in our field.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1211-1216
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Forensic Sciences
Volume54
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Forensic Anthropology
Practice Guidelines
Research Design

Keywords

  • Daubert
  • Error rate
  • Forensic anthropology
  • Forensic science
  • Professional standards
  • Scientific Working Group
  • SWGANTH
  • Validation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Genetics

Cite this

Evidentiary standards for forensic anthropology. / Christensen, Angi M.; Crowder, Christian M.

In: Journal of Forensic Sciences, Vol. 54, No. 6, 01.11.2009, p. 1211-1216.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Christensen, Angi M. ; Crowder, Christian M. / Evidentiary standards for forensic anthropology. In: Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2009 ; Vol. 54, No. 6. pp. 1211-1216.
@article{5f7a398e157040d2b810ae9b38ce384e,
title = "Evidentiary standards for forensic anthropology",
abstract = "As issues of professional standards and error rates continue to be addressed in the courts, forensic anthropologists should be proactive by developing and adhering to professional standards of best practice. There has been recent increased awareness and interest in critically assessing some of the techniques used by forensic anthropologists, but issues such as validation, error rates, and professional standards have seldom been addressed. Here we explore the legal impetus for this trend and identify areas where we can improve regarding these issues. We also discuss the recent formation of a Scientific Working Group for Forensic Anthropology (SWGANTH), which was created with the purposes of encouraging discourse among anthropologists and developing and disseminating consensus guidelines for the practice of forensic anthropology. We believe it is possible and advisable for anthropologists to seek and espouse research and methodological techniques that meet higher standards to ensure quality and consistency in our field.",
keywords = "Daubert, Error rate, Forensic anthropology, Forensic science, Professional standards, Scientific Working Group, SWGANTH, Validation",
author = "Christensen, {Angi M.} and Crowder, {Christian M.}",
year = "2009",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.01176.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "54",
pages = "1211--1216",
journal = "Journal of Forensic Sciences",
issn = "0022-1198",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evidentiary standards for forensic anthropology

AU - Christensen, Angi M.

AU - Crowder, Christian M.

PY - 2009/11/1

Y1 - 2009/11/1

N2 - As issues of professional standards and error rates continue to be addressed in the courts, forensic anthropologists should be proactive by developing and adhering to professional standards of best practice. There has been recent increased awareness and interest in critically assessing some of the techniques used by forensic anthropologists, but issues such as validation, error rates, and professional standards have seldom been addressed. Here we explore the legal impetus for this trend and identify areas where we can improve regarding these issues. We also discuss the recent formation of a Scientific Working Group for Forensic Anthropology (SWGANTH), which was created with the purposes of encouraging discourse among anthropologists and developing and disseminating consensus guidelines for the practice of forensic anthropology. We believe it is possible and advisable for anthropologists to seek and espouse research and methodological techniques that meet higher standards to ensure quality and consistency in our field.

AB - As issues of professional standards and error rates continue to be addressed in the courts, forensic anthropologists should be proactive by developing and adhering to professional standards of best practice. There has been recent increased awareness and interest in critically assessing some of the techniques used by forensic anthropologists, but issues such as validation, error rates, and professional standards have seldom been addressed. Here we explore the legal impetus for this trend and identify areas where we can improve regarding these issues. We also discuss the recent formation of a Scientific Working Group for Forensic Anthropology (SWGANTH), which was created with the purposes of encouraging discourse among anthropologists and developing and disseminating consensus guidelines for the practice of forensic anthropology. We believe it is possible and advisable for anthropologists to seek and espouse research and methodological techniques that meet higher standards to ensure quality and consistency in our field.

KW - Daubert

KW - Error rate

KW - Forensic anthropology

KW - Forensic science

KW - Professional standards

KW - Scientific Working Group

KW - SWGANTH

KW - Validation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70350502035&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70350502035&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.01176.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.01176.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 19804520

AN - SCOPUS:70350502035

VL - 54

SP - 1211

EP - 1216

JO - Journal of Forensic Sciences

JF - Journal of Forensic Sciences

SN - 0022-1198

IS - 6

ER -