Experience with the ileal bladder (Camey procedure) and cecoileal reservoirs for continent urinary diversion.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

I have reviewed our own experience with the ileal bladder and with cecal and cecoileal reservoirs, along with the reported experiences of other investigators. Both of these major classes of diversion offer continent nonrefluxing storage of urine. I advise patients who are candidates for either type of procedure to weigh the prospect of urethral voiding (but enuresis with the ileal bladder) v a continent abdominal stoma that requires self-catheterization of variable difficulty with a cecoileal reservoir. The perfect urinary diversion does not exist. Greater experience in time and numbers is required to know if the newer procedures reviewed here are even as good as the ileal conduit. However, the potential for greater preservation of renal function and significantly improved quality of life cannot be denied.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)28-45
Number of pages18
JournalSeminars in Urology
Volume5
Issue number1
StatePublished - Feb 1987

Fingerprint

Urinary Diversion
Urinary Bladder
Enuresis
Catheterization
Quality of Life
Research Personnel
Urine
Kidney

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

@article{08c54bbd78d4481cb00516966117e18c,
title = "Experience with the ileal bladder (Camey procedure) and cecoileal reservoirs for continent urinary diversion.",
abstract = "I have reviewed our own experience with the ileal bladder and with cecal and cecoileal reservoirs, along with the reported experiences of other investigators. Both of these major classes of diversion offer continent nonrefluxing storage of urine. I advise patients who are candidates for either type of procedure to weigh the prospect of urethral voiding (but enuresis with the ileal bladder) v a continent abdominal stoma that requires self-catheterization of variable difficulty with a cecoileal reservoir. The perfect urinary diversion does not exist. Greater experience in time and numbers is required to know if the newer procedures reviewed here are even as good as the ileal conduit. However, the potential for greater preservation of renal function and significantly improved quality of life cannot be denied.",
author = "Sagalowsky, {Arthur I}",
year = "1987",
month = "2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "28--45",
journal = "Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations",
issn = "1078-1439",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Experience with the ileal bladder (Camey procedure) and cecoileal reservoirs for continent urinary diversion.

AU - Sagalowsky, Arthur I

PY - 1987/2

Y1 - 1987/2

N2 - I have reviewed our own experience with the ileal bladder and with cecal and cecoileal reservoirs, along with the reported experiences of other investigators. Both of these major classes of diversion offer continent nonrefluxing storage of urine. I advise patients who are candidates for either type of procedure to weigh the prospect of urethral voiding (but enuresis with the ileal bladder) v a continent abdominal stoma that requires self-catheterization of variable difficulty with a cecoileal reservoir. The perfect urinary diversion does not exist. Greater experience in time and numbers is required to know if the newer procedures reviewed here are even as good as the ileal conduit. However, the potential for greater preservation of renal function and significantly improved quality of life cannot be denied.

AB - I have reviewed our own experience with the ileal bladder and with cecal and cecoileal reservoirs, along with the reported experiences of other investigators. Both of these major classes of diversion offer continent nonrefluxing storage of urine. I advise patients who are candidates for either type of procedure to weigh the prospect of urethral voiding (but enuresis with the ileal bladder) v a continent abdominal stoma that requires self-catheterization of variable difficulty with a cecoileal reservoir. The perfect urinary diversion does not exist. Greater experience in time and numbers is required to know if the newer procedures reviewed here are even as good as the ileal conduit. However, the potential for greater preservation of renal function and significantly improved quality of life cannot be denied.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0023282293&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0023282293&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 3563173

AN - SCOPUS:0023282293

VL - 5

SP - 28

EP - 45

JO - Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations

JF - Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations

SN - 1078-1439

IS - 1

ER -