Extreme nonresponse to acute phase cognitive therapy for depression: An attempt to replicate and extend

Aaron M. Koenig, Robin B. Jarrett, Robert Gallop, Marna S. Barrett, Michael E. Thase

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

As with other interventions for major depressive disorder (MDD), cognitive therapy (CT) results in treatment failure for about half of all participants. In 2007, Coffman and colleagues in Seattle studied this topic by identifying a group of patients who demonstrated an extremely poor response to CT (i.e., posttreatment BDI score. ≥. 31). They called these patients "extreme nonresponders" (ENR) and described the pretreatment characteristics that predicted response status.In the current study, we attempt a replication of the Seattle study with a larger sample of adults with recurrent MDD (N= 473) who received a 16-20 session (12-14. week) course of CT.The rate of ENR in this large sample was only 6.3% (30/473), compared to 22.2% (10/45) in the Seattle sample. Four pretreatment measures of symptom severity and functioning differed significantly among ENR and non-ENR participants. In each case, higher symptoms or poorer functioning were associated with ENR status. However, the combination of these factors in a regression model did not predict actual ENR status with the high degree of sensitivity or specificity observed in the Seattle study.These findings suggest that extreme nonresponse to CT is not as common as previously described and, although poor outcomes are associated with pretreatment clinical status, it is difficult to predict posttreatment symptom severity with a high degree of accuracy across different research samples.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)300-313
Number of pages14
JournalBehavior Therapy
Volume45
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Cognitive Therapy
Depression
Major Depressive Disorder
Treatment Failure
Sensitivity and Specificity
Research

Keywords

  • Cognitive therapy (CT)
  • Major depressive disorder (MDD)
  • Nonresponse
  • Predictors of response

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

Extreme nonresponse to acute phase cognitive therapy for depression : An attempt to replicate and extend. / Koenig, Aaron M.; Jarrett, Robin B.; Gallop, Robert; Barrett, Marna S.; Thase, Michael E.

In: Behavior Therapy, Vol. 45, No. 3, 2014, p. 300-313.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Koenig, Aaron M. ; Jarrett, Robin B. ; Gallop, Robert ; Barrett, Marna S. ; Thase, Michael E. / Extreme nonresponse to acute phase cognitive therapy for depression : An attempt to replicate and extend. In: Behavior Therapy. 2014 ; Vol. 45, No. 3. pp. 300-313.
@article{320b303688104e10a41b25296defd84f,
title = "Extreme nonresponse to acute phase cognitive therapy for depression: An attempt to replicate and extend",
abstract = "As with other interventions for major depressive disorder (MDD), cognitive therapy (CT) results in treatment failure for about half of all participants. In 2007, Coffman and colleagues in Seattle studied this topic by identifying a group of patients who demonstrated an extremely poor response to CT (i.e., posttreatment BDI score. ≥. 31). They called these patients {"}extreme nonresponders{"} (ENR) and described the pretreatment characteristics that predicted response status.In the current study, we attempt a replication of the Seattle study with a larger sample of adults with recurrent MDD (N= 473) who received a 16-20 session (12-14. week) course of CT.The rate of ENR in this large sample was only 6.3{\%} (30/473), compared to 22.2{\%} (10/45) in the Seattle sample. Four pretreatment measures of symptom severity and functioning differed significantly among ENR and non-ENR participants. In each case, higher symptoms or poorer functioning were associated with ENR status. However, the combination of these factors in a regression model did not predict actual ENR status with the high degree of sensitivity or specificity observed in the Seattle study.These findings suggest that extreme nonresponse to CT is not as common as previously described and, although poor outcomes are associated with pretreatment clinical status, it is difficult to predict posttreatment symptom severity with a high degree of accuracy across different research samples.",
keywords = "Cognitive therapy (CT), Major depressive disorder (MDD), Nonresponse, Predictors of response",
author = "Koenig, {Aaron M.} and Jarrett, {Robin B.} and Robert Gallop and Barrett, {Marna S.} and Thase, {Michael E.}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1016/j.beth.2013.12.005",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "45",
pages = "300--313",
journal = "Behavior Therapy",
issn = "0005-7894",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Extreme nonresponse to acute phase cognitive therapy for depression

T2 - An attempt to replicate and extend

AU - Koenig, Aaron M.

AU - Jarrett, Robin B.

AU - Gallop, Robert

AU - Barrett, Marna S.

AU - Thase, Michael E.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - As with other interventions for major depressive disorder (MDD), cognitive therapy (CT) results in treatment failure for about half of all participants. In 2007, Coffman and colleagues in Seattle studied this topic by identifying a group of patients who demonstrated an extremely poor response to CT (i.e., posttreatment BDI score. ≥. 31). They called these patients "extreme nonresponders" (ENR) and described the pretreatment characteristics that predicted response status.In the current study, we attempt a replication of the Seattle study with a larger sample of adults with recurrent MDD (N= 473) who received a 16-20 session (12-14. week) course of CT.The rate of ENR in this large sample was only 6.3% (30/473), compared to 22.2% (10/45) in the Seattle sample. Four pretreatment measures of symptom severity and functioning differed significantly among ENR and non-ENR participants. In each case, higher symptoms or poorer functioning were associated with ENR status. However, the combination of these factors in a regression model did not predict actual ENR status with the high degree of sensitivity or specificity observed in the Seattle study.These findings suggest that extreme nonresponse to CT is not as common as previously described and, although poor outcomes are associated with pretreatment clinical status, it is difficult to predict posttreatment symptom severity with a high degree of accuracy across different research samples.

AB - As with other interventions for major depressive disorder (MDD), cognitive therapy (CT) results in treatment failure for about half of all participants. In 2007, Coffman and colleagues in Seattle studied this topic by identifying a group of patients who demonstrated an extremely poor response to CT (i.e., posttreatment BDI score. ≥. 31). They called these patients "extreme nonresponders" (ENR) and described the pretreatment characteristics that predicted response status.In the current study, we attempt a replication of the Seattle study with a larger sample of adults with recurrent MDD (N= 473) who received a 16-20 session (12-14. week) course of CT.The rate of ENR in this large sample was only 6.3% (30/473), compared to 22.2% (10/45) in the Seattle sample. Four pretreatment measures of symptom severity and functioning differed significantly among ENR and non-ENR participants. In each case, higher symptoms or poorer functioning were associated with ENR status. However, the combination of these factors in a regression model did not predict actual ENR status with the high degree of sensitivity or specificity observed in the Seattle study.These findings suggest that extreme nonresponse to CT is not as common as previously described and, although poor outcomes are associated with pretreatment clinical status, it is difficult to predict posttreatment symptom severity with a high degree of accuracy across different research samples.

KW - Cognitive therapy (CT)

KW - Major depressive disorder (MDD)

KW - Nonresponse

KW - Predictors of response

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84897033488&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84897033488&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.beth.2013.12.005

DO - 10.1016/j.beth.2013.12.005

M3 - Article

C2 - 24680227

AN - SCOPUS:84897033488

VL - 45

SP - 300

EP - 313

JO - Behavior Therapy

JF - Behavior Therapy

SN - 0005-7894

IS - 3

ER -