Fabrication and biocompatibility of polypyrrole implants suitable for neural prosthetics

Paul M. George, Alvin W. Lyckman, David A. Lavan, Anita Hegde, Yuika Leung, Rupali Avasare, Chris Testa, Phillip M. Alexander, Robert Langer, Mriganka Sur

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

412 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Finding a conductive substrate that promotes neural interactions is an essential step for advancing neural interfaces. The biocompatibility and conductive properties of polypyrrole (PPy) make it an attractive substrate for neural scaffolds, electrodes, and devices. Stand-alone polymer implants also provide the additional advantages of flexibility and biodegradability. To examine PPy biocompatibility, dissociated primary cerebral cortical cells were cultured on PPy samples that had been doped with polystyrene-sulfonate (PSS) or sodium dodecylbenzenesulfonate (NaDBS). Various conditions were used for electrodeposition to produce different surface properties. Neural networks grew on all of the PPy surfaces. PPy implants, consisting of the same dopants and conditions, were surgically implanted in the cerebral cortex of the rat. The results were compared to stab wounds and Teflon implants of the same size. Quantification of the intensity and extent of gliosis at 3- and 6-week time points demonstrated that all versions of PPy were at least as biocompatible as Teflon and in fact performed better in most cases. In all of the PPy implant cases, neurons and glial cells enveloped the implant. In several cases, neural tissue was present in the lumen of the implants, allowing contact of the brain parenchyma through the implants.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3511-3519
Number of pages9
JournalBiomaterials
Volume26
Issue number17
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2005

Fingerprint

Polypyrroles
Prosthetics
Biocompatibility
Fabrication
Surface Properties
Polytetrafluoroethylene
Polytetrafluoroethylenes
Electroplating
Stab Wounds
Gliosis
Biodegradability
Substrates
polypyrrole
Electrodeposition
Scaffolds
Neuroglia
Cerebral Cortex
Neurons
Surface properties
Rats

Keywords

  • Biocompatibility
  • Electroactive polymer
  • In vitro test
  • In vivo test
  • Micropatterning
  • Neural prosthesis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biotechnology
  • Bioengineering
  • Biomedical Engineering

Cite this

George, P. M., Lyckman, A. W., Lavan, D. A., Hegde, A., Leung, Y., Avasare, R., ... Sur, M. (2005). Fabrication and biocompatibility of polypyrrole implants suitable for neural prosthetics. Biomaterials, 26(17), 3511-3519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.09.037

Fabrication and biocompatibility of polypyrrole implants suitable for neural prosthetics. / George, Paul M.; Lyckman, Alvin W.; Lavan, David A.; Hegde, Anita; Leung, Yuika; Avasare, Rupali; Testa, Chris; Alexander, Phillip M.; Langer, Robert; Sur, Mriganka.

In: Biomaterials, Vol. 26, No. 17, 06.2005, p. 3511-3519.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

George, PM, Lyckman, AW, Lavan, DA, Hegde, A, Leung, Y, Avasare, R, Testa, C, Alexander, PM, Langer, R & Sur, M 2005, 'Fabrication and biocompatibility of polypyrrole implants suitable for neural prosthetics', Biomaterials, vol. 26, no. 17, pp. 3511-3519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.09.037
George, Paul M. ; Lyckman, Alvin W. ; Lavan, David A. ; Hegde, Anita ; Leung, Yuika ; Avasare, Rupali ; Testa, Chris ; Alexander, Phillip M. ; Langer, Robert ; Sur, Mriganka. / Fabrication and biocompatibility of polypyrrole implants suitable for neural prosthetics. In: Biomaterials. 2005 ; Vol. 26, No. 17. pp. 3511-3519.
@article{7d63c2b190834a5384e2b08d544ed186,
title = "Fabrication and biocompatibility of polypyrrole implants suitable for neural prosthetics",
abstract = "Finding a conductive substrate that promotes neural interactions is an essential step for advancing neural interfaces. The biocompatibility and conductive properties of polypyrrole (PPy) make it an attractive substrate for neural scaffolds, electrodes, and devices. Stand-alone polymer implants also provide the additional advantages of flexibility and biodegradability. To examine PPy biocompatibility, dissociated primary cerebral cortical cells were cultured on PPy samples that had been doped with polystyrene-sulfonate (PSS) or sodium dodecylbenzenesulfonate (NaDBS). Various conditions were used for electrodeposition to produce different surface properties. Neural networks grew on all of the PPy surfaces. PPy implants, consisting of the same dopants and conditions, were surgically implanted in the cerebral cortex of the rat. The results were compared to stab wounds and Teflon implants of the same size. Quantification of the intensity and extent of gliosis at 3- and 6-week time points demonstrated that all versions of PPy were at least as biocompatible as Teflon and in fact performed better in most cases. In all of the PPy implant cases, neurons and glial cells enveloped the implant. In several cases, neural tissue was present in the lumen of the implants, allowing contact of the brain parenchyma through the implants.",
keywords = "Biocompatibility, Electroactive polymer, In vitro test, In vivo test, Micropatterning, Neural prosthesis",
author = "George, {Paul M.} and Lyckman, {Alvin W.} and Lavan, {David A.} and Anita Hegde and Yuika Leung and Rupali Avasare and Chris Testa and Alexander, {Phillip M.} and Robert Langer and Mriganka Sur",
year = "2005",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.09.037",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "3511--3519",
journal = "Biomaterials",
issn = "0142-9612",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "17",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fabrication and biocompatibility of polypyrrole implants suitable for neural prosthetics

AU - George, Paul M.

AU - Lyckman, Alvin W.

AU - Lavan, David A.

AU - Hegde, Anita

AU - Leung, Yuika

AU - Avasare, Rupali

AU - Testa, Chris

AU - Alexander, Phillip M.

AU - Langer, Robert

AU - Sur, Mriganka

PY - 2005/6

Y1 - 2005/6

N2 - Finding a conductive substrate that promotes neural interactions is an essential step for advancing neural interfaces. The biocompatibility and conductive properties of polypyrrole (PPy) make it an attractive substrate for neural scaffolds, electrodes, and devices. Stand-alone polymer implants also provide the additional advantages of flexibility and biodegradability. To examine PPy biocompatibility, dissociated primary cerebral cortical cells were cultured on PPy samples that had been doped with polystyrene-sulfonate (PSS) or sodium dodecylbenzenesulfonate (NaDBS). Various conditions were used for electrodeposition to produce different surface properties. Neural networks grew on all of the PPy surfaces. PPy implants, consisting of the same dopants and conditions, were surgically implanted in the cerebral cortex of the rat. The results were compared to stab wounds and Teflon implants of the same size. Quantification of the intensity and extent of gliosis at 3- and 6-week time points demonstrated that all versions of PPy were at least as biocompatible as Teflon and in fact performed better in most cases. In all of the PPy implant cases, neurons and glial cells enveloped the implant. In several cases, neural tissue was present in the lumen of the implants, allowing contact of the brain parenchyma through the implants.

AB - Finding a conductive substrate that promotes neural interactions is an essential step for advancing neural interfaces. The biocompatibility and conductive properties of polypyrrole (PPy) make it an attractive substrate for neural scaffolds, electrodes, and devices. Stand-alone polymer implants also provide the additional advantages of flexibility and biodegradability. To examine PPy biocompatibility, dissociated primary cerebral cortical cells were cultured on PPy samples that had been doped with polystyrene-sulfonate (PSS) or sodium dodecylbenzenesulfonate (NaDBS). Various conditions were used for electrodeposition to produce different surface properties. Neural networks grew on all of the PPy surfaces. PPy implants, consisting of the same dopants and conditions, were surgically implanted in the cerebral cortex of the rat. The results were compared to stab wounds and Teflon implants of the same size. Quantification of the intensity and extent of gliosis at 3- and 6-week time points demonstrated that all versions of PPy were at least as biocompatible as Teflon and in fact performed better in most cases. In all of the PPy implant cases, neurons and glial cells enveloped the implant. In several cases, neural tissue was present in the lumen of the implants, allowing contact of the brain parenchyma through the implants.

KW - Biocompatibility

KW - Electroactive polymer

KW - In vitro test

KW - In vivo test

KW - Micropatterning

KW - Neural prosthesis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=19944398419&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=19944398419&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.09.037

DO - 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.09.037

M3 - Article

C2 - 15621241

AN - SCOPUS:19944398419

VL - 26

SP - 3511

EP - 3519

JO - Biomaterials

JF - Biomaterials

SN - 0142-9612

IS - 17

ER -