TY - JOUR
T1 - Facebook discussion groups provide a robust worldwide platform for free pathology education
AU - Gonzalez, Raul S.
AU - Amer, Sadiq M.
AU - Yahia, Nejib Ben
AU - Costa, Felipe D.Almeida
AU - Noatay, Manu
AU - Qiao, Jian Hua
AU - Rosado, Flavia G.
AU - Rosen, Yale
AU - Sedassari, Bruno Tavares
AU - Yantiss, Rhonda K.
AU - Gardner, Jerad M.
PY - 2017/5
Y1 - 2017/5
N2 - Context: Facebook (Menlo Park, California) is one of many online sites that provide potential educational tools for pathologists. We have each founded Facebook groups dedicated to anatomic pathology, in which members can share cases, ask questions, and contribute to discussions. Objectives: To report our experiences in founding and maintaining these Facebook groups and to characterize the contributed content. Design: We circulated a survey among the group founders, then compiled and analyzed the responses. Results: The groups varied in membership and in the quality of member contribution. Most posts were of pathology cases, although other topics (such as research articles) were also shared. All groups remained active and received posts from users all over the world, although all groups had many noncontributing members and received unwanted messages (which were screened and removed). Most founders were glad they had founded the groups because they provided an opportunity to both teach and learn. Conclusions: Each analyzed Facebook group had a different character, and some downsides exist, but the groups all provided a no-cost way for pathologists and others across the world to interact online with many colleagues.
AB - Context: Facebook (Menlo Park, California) is one of many online sites that provide potential educational tools for pathologists. We have each founded Facebook groups dedicated to anatomic pathology, in which members can share cases, ask questions, and contribute to discussions. Objectives: To report our experiences in founding and maintaining these Facebook groups and to characterize the contributed content. Design: We circulated a survey among the group founders, then compiled and analyzed the responses. Results: The groups varied in membership and in the quality of member contribution. Most posts were of pathology cases, although other topics (such as research articles) were also shared. All groups remained active and received posts from users all over the world, although all groups had many noncontributing members and received unwanted messages (which were screened and removed). Most founders were glad they had founded the groups because they provided an opportunity to both teach and learn. Conclusions: Each analyzed Facebook group had a different character, and some downsides exist, but the groups all provided a no-cost way for pathologists and others across the world to interact online with many colleagues.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018293395&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85018293395&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5858/arpa.2016-0369-OA
DO - 10.5858/arpa.2016-0369-OA
M3 - Review article
C2 - 27763789
AN - SCOPUS:85018293395
SN - 0003-9985
VL - 141
SP - 690
EP - 695
JO - Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
JF - Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
IS - 5
ER -