Factorial validity and invariance of a survey measuring psychosocial correlates of colorectal cancer screening among African Americans and Caucasians

Jasmin A. Tiro, Sally W. Vernon, Terry Hyslop, Ronald E. Myers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

63 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Psychosocial constructs are widely used to predict colorectal cancer screening and are targeted as intermediate outcomes in behavioral intervention studies. Reliable and valid instruments for measuring general colorectal cancer screening psychosocial constructs are needed; yet, few studies have conducted psychometric analyses. This study replicated a five-factor structure for 16 theory-based, general colorectal cancer screening items measuring salience and coherence, cancer worries, perceived susceptibility, response efficacy, and social influence. In addition, we examined factorial invariance across race and sex. Methods: African American and Caucasian patients (n = 1,413) attending an urban, primary care clinic were included in this study. These individuals completed a baseline survey as part of a colorectal cancer screening intervention trial. Single and multigroup confirmatory factor analyses using maximum-likelihood estimation were done. Results: The five-factor general colorectal cancer screening model provided excellent fit and was invariant across race-sex subgroups. Conclusions: The findings of invariance across sex and race subgroups support the use of these scales to measure group differences.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2855-2861
Number of pages7
JournalCancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention
Volume14
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2005

Fingerprint

Early Detection of Cancer
African Americans
Colorectal Neoplasms
Psychometrics
Statistical Factor Analysis
Primary Health Care
Surveys and Questionnaires
Neoplasms

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology
  • Oncology

Cite this

Factorial validity and invariance of a survey measuring psychosocial correlates of colorectal cancer screening among African Americans and Caucasians. / Tiro, Jasmin A.; Vernon, Sally W.; Hyslop, Terry; Myers, Ronald E.

In: Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention, Vol. 14, No. 12, 12.2005, p. 2855-2861.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6347517a35814615a5618b369f393fbe,
title = "Factorial validity and invariance of a survey measuring psychosocial correlates of colorectal cancer screening among African Americans and Caucasians",
abstract = "Background: Psychosocial constructs are widely used to predict colorectal cancer screening and are targeted as intermediate outcomes in behavioral intervention studies. Reliable and valid instruments for measuring general colorectal cancer screening psychosocial constructs are needed; yet, few studies have conducted psychometric analyses. This study replicated a five-factor structure for 16 theory-based, general colorectal cancer screening items measuring salience and coherence, cancer worries, perceived susceptibility, response efficacy, and social influence. In addition, we examined factorial invariance across race and sex. Methods: African American and Caucasian patients (n = 1,413) attending an urban, primary care clinic were included in this study. These individuals completed a baseline survey as part of a colorectal cancer screening intervention trial. Single and multigroup confirmatory factor analyses using maximum-likelihood estimation were done. Results: The five-factor general colorectal cancer screening model provided excellent fit and was invariant across race-sex subgroups. Conclusions: The findings of invariance across sex and race subgroups support the use of these scales to measure group differences.",
author = "Tiro, {Jasmin A.} and Vernon, {Sally W.} and Terry Hyslop and Myers, {Ronald E.}",
year = "2005",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0217",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "2855--2861",
journal = "Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention",
issn = "1055-9965",
publisher = "American Association for Cancer Research Inc.",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Factorial validity and invariance of a survey measuring psychosocial correlates of colorectal cancer screening among African Americans and Caucasians

AU - Tiro, Jasmin A.

AU - Vernon, Sally W.

AU - Hyslop, Terry

AU - Myers, Ronald E.

PY - 2005/12

Y1 - 2005/12

N2 - Background: Psychosocial constructs are widely used to predict colorectal cancer screening and are targeted as intermediate outcomes in behavioral intervention studies. Reliable and valid instruments for measuring general colorectal cancer screening psychosocial constructs are needed; yet, few studies have conducted psychometric analyses. This study replicated a five-factor structure for 16 theory-based, general colorectal cancer screening items measuring salience and coherence, cancer worries, perceived susceptibility, response efficacy, and social influence. In addition, we examined factorial invariance across race and sex. Methods: African American and Caucasian patients (n = 1,413) attending an urban, primary care clinic were included in this study. These individuals completed a baseline survey as part of a colorectal cancer screening intervention trial. Single and multigroup confirmatory factor analyses using maximum-likelihood estimation were done. Results: The five-factor general colorectal cancer screening model provided excellent fit and was invariant across race-sex subgroups. Conclusions: The findings of invariance across sex and race subgroups support the use of these scales to measure group differences.

AB - Background: Psychosocial constructs are widely used to predict colorectal cancer screening and are targeted as intermediate outcomes in behavioral intervention studies. Reliable and valid instruments for measuring general colorectal cancer screening psychosocial constructs are needed; yet, few studies have conducted psychometric analyses. This study replicated a five-factor structure for 16 theory-based, general colorectal cancer screening items measuring salience and coherence, cancer worries, perceived susceptibility, response efficacy, and social influence. In addition, we examined factorial invariance across race and sex. Methods: African American and Caucasian patients (n = 1,413) attending an urban, primary care clinic were included in this study. These individuals completed a baseline survey as part of a colorectal cancer screening intervention trial. Single and multigroup confirmatory factor analyses using maximum-likelihood estimation were done. Results: The five-factor general colorectal cancer screening model provided excellent fit and was invariant across race-sex subgroups. Conclusions: The findings of invariance across sex and race subgroups support the use of these scales to measure group differences.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=30344488461&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=30344488461&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0217

DO - 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0217

M3 - Article

C2 - 16365000

AN - SCOPUS:30344488461

VL - 14

SP - 2855

EP - 2861

JO - Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention

JF - Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention

SN - 1055-9965

IS - 12

ER -