Factors affecting rejection of bariatric patients from an academic weight loss program

Shawn Tsuda, Limaris Barrios, Benjamin Schneider, Daniel B. Jones

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: To determine the factors affecting rejection of bariatric candidates at an accredited, American College of Surgeons Level 1A, bariatric program. Bariatric surgery "Centers of Excellence" use a multidisciplinary team to screen patients for eligibility for surgery using insurance, medical history, psychological evaluation findings, and the surgeon assessment. Few studies have reported on the frequency or reasons for patients not being accepted for surgery among high-volume academic bariatric programs. Methods: From March to September 2007, 299 consecutive patients were accepted for evaluation into an accredited bariatric program and tracked for the incidence of rejection for weight loss surgery. The primary reasons for rejection included a lack of insurance coverage, being medically unfit, psychological or social inappropriateness, and a body mass index (BMI) that did not meet the cutoff (BMI <35 kg/m 2 or <40 kg/m 2 without co-morbid conditions). Results: Of 299 screened patients, 90 (30.1%) were not accepted for surgery by the multidisciplinary team. The most frequent reason was the lack of insurance coverage (47.8%). Primary care physicians were the most common source of patient referral. All but 1 of the patients excluded because of an inadequate BMI (n = 13) had been referred by friends, co-workers, or themselves from information received from the Internet or television. Conclusion: Approximately one third of screened patients were not accepted for surgery by an academic bariatric program. Self- or social referral appeared to correlate with rejection because the BMI did not meet the criteria for surgery. This suggests inadequate information among social referral networks and/or in the media. Long-term follow-up will determine the health outcomes of patients not cleared for weight loss surgery.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)199-202
Number of pages4
JournalSurgery for Obesity and Related Diseases
Volume5
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2009

Fingerprint

Weight Reduction Programs
Bariatrics
Body Mass Index
Insurance Coverage
Bariatric Surgery
Referral and Consultation
Weight Loss
Psychology
Television
Primary Care Physicians
Insurance
Social Support
Internet
Incidence
Health

Keywords

  • Accreditation
  • Bariatric surgery
  • Centers of Excellence
  • Insurance
  • Morbid obesity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Factors affecting rejection of bariatric patients from an academic weight loss program. / Tsuda, Shawn; Barrios, Limaris; Schneider, Benjamin; Jones, Daniel B.

In: Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases, Vol. 5, No. 2, 01.03.2009, p. 199-202.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d02c8cdf3677466ea332cb9f29f8f9a3,
title = "Factors affecting rejection of bariatric patients from an academic weight loss program",
abstract = "Background: To determine the factors affecting rejection of bariatric candidates at an accredited, American College of Surgeons Level 1A, bariatric program. Bariatric surgery {"}Centers of Excellence{"} use a multidisciplinary team to screen patients for eligibility for surgery using insurance, medical history, psychological evaluation findings, and the surgeon assessment. Few studies have reported on the frequency or reasons for patients not being accepted for surgery among high-volume academic bariatric programs. Methods: From March to September 2007, 299 consecutive patients were accepted for evaluation into an accredited bariatric program and tracked for the incidence of rejection for weight loss surgery. The primary reasons for rejection included a lack of insurance coverage, being medically unfit, psychological or social inappropriateness, and a body mass index (BMI) that did not meet the cutoff (BMI <35 kg/m 2 or <40 kg/m 2 without co-morbid conditions). Results: Of 299 screened patients, 90 (30.1{\%}) were not accepted for surgery by the multidisciplinary team. The most frequent reason was the lack of insurance coverage (47.8{\%}). Primary care physicians were the most common source of patient referral. All but 1 of the patients excluded because of an inadequate BMI (n = 13) had been referred by friends, co-workers, or themselves from information received from the Internet or television. Conclusion: Approximately one third of screened patients were not accepted for surgery by an academic bariatric program. Self- or social referral appeared to correlate with rejection because the BMI did not meet the criteria for surgery. This suggests inadequate information among social referral networks and/or in the media. Long-term follow-up will determine the health outcomes of patients not cleared for weight loss surgery.",
keywords = "Accreditation, Bariatric surgery, Centers of Excellence, Insurance, Morbid obesity",
author = "Shawn Tsuda and Limaris Barrios and Benjamin Schneider and Jones, {Daniel B.}",
year = "2009",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.soard.2008.09.014",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "199--202",
journal = "Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases",
issn = "1550-7289",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Factors affecting rejection of bariatric patients from an academic weight loss program

AU - Tsuda, Shawn

AU - Barrios, Limaris

AU - Schneider, Benjamin

AU - Jones, Daniel B.

PY - 2009/3/1

Y1 - 2009/3/1

N2 - Background: To determine the factors affecting rejection of bariatric candidates at an accredited, American College of Surgeons Level 1A, bariatric program. Bariatric surgery "Centers of Excellence" use a multidisciplinary team to screen patients for eligibility for surgery using insurance, medical history, psychological evaluation findings, and the surgeon assessment. Few studies have reported on the frequency or reasons for patients not being accepted for surgery among high-volume academic bariatric programs. Methods: From March to September 2007, 299 consecutive patients were accepted for evaluation into an accredited bariatric program and tracked for the incidence of rejection for weight loss surgery. The primary reasons for rejection included a lack of insurance coverage, being medically unfit, psychological or social inappropriateness, and a body mass index (BMI) that did not meet the cutoff (BMI <35 kg/m 2 or <40 kg/m 2 without co-morbid conditions). Results: Of 299 screened patients, 90 (30.1%) were not accepted for surgery by the multidisciplinary team. The most frequent reason was the lack of insurance coverage (47.8%). Primary care physicians were the most common source of patient referral. All but 1 of the patients excluded because of an inadequate BMI (n = 13) had been referred by friends, co-workers, or themselves from information received from the Internet or television. Conclusion: Approximately one third of screened patients were not accepted for surgery by an academic bariatric program. Self- or social referral appeared to correlate with rejection because the BMI did not meet the criteria for surgery. This suggests inadequate information among social referral networks and/or in the media. Long-term follow-up will determine the health outcomes of patients not cleared for weight loss surgery.

AB - Background: To determine the factors affecting rejection of bariatric candidates at an accredited, American College of Surgeons Level 1A, bariatric program. Bariatric surgery "Centers of Excellence" use a multidisciplinary team to screen patients for eligibility for surgery using insurance, medical history, psychological evaluation findings, and the surgeon assessment. Few studies have reported on the frequency or reasons for patients not being accepted for surgery among high-volume academic bariatric programs. Methods: From March to September 2007, 299 consecutive patients were accepted for evaluation into an accredited bariatric program and tracked for the incidence of rejection for weight loss surgery. The primary reasons for rejection included a lack of insurance coverage, being medically unfit, psychological or social inappropriateness, and a body mass index (BMI) that did not meet the cutoff (BMI <35 kg/m 2 or <40 kg/m 2 without co-morbid conditions). Results: Of 299 screened patients, 90 (30.1%) were not accepted for surgery by the multidisciplinary team. The most frequent reason was the lack of insurance coverage (47.8%). Primary care physicians were the most common source of patient referral. All but 1 of the patients excluded because of an inadequate BMI (n = 13) had been referred by friends, co-workers, or themselves from information received from the Internet or television. Conclusion: Approximately one third of screened patients were not accepted for surgery by an academic bariatric program. Self- or social referral appeared to correlate with rejection because the BMI did not meet the criteria for surgery. This suggests inadequate information among social referral networks and/or in the media. Long-term follow-up will determine the health outcomes of patients not cleared for weight loss surgery.

KW - Accreditation

KW - Bariatric surgery

KW - Centers of Excellence

KW - Insurance

KW - Morbid obesity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=62549157327&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=62549157327&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.soard.2008.09.014

DO - 10.1016/j.soard.2008.09.014

M3 - Article

C2 - 19136316

AN - SCOPUS:62549157327

VL - 5

SP - 199

EP - 202

JO - Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases

JF - Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases

SN - 1550-7289

IS - 2

ER -