Factors associated with the career choices of hematology and medical oncology fellows trained at academic institutions in the United States

Leora Horn, Elizabeth Koehler, Jill Gilbert, David H. Johnson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Factors that influence hematology-oncology fellows' choice of academic medicine as a career are not well defined. We undertook a survey of hematology-oncology fellows training at cancer centers designated by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) to understand the factors fellows consider when making career decisions. Methods: Program directors at all NCI and NCCN cancer centers were invited to participate in the study. For the purpose of analysis, fellows were grouped into three groups on the basis of interest in an academic career. Demographic data were tested with the Kruskal-Wallis test and χ 2 test, and nondemographic data were tested by using the multiscale bootstrap method. Results: Twenty-eight of 56 eligible fellowship programs participated, and 236 fellows at participating institutions responded (62% response rate). Approximately 60% of fellows graduating from academic programs in the last 5 years chose academic career paths. Forty-nine percent of current fellows ranked an academic career as extremely important. Fellows choosing an academic career were more likely to have presented and published their research. Additional factors associated with choosing an academic career included factors related to mentorship, intellect, and practice type. Fellows selecting nonacademic careers prioritized lifestyle in their career decision. Conclusion: Recruitment into academic medicine is essential for continued progress in the field. Our data suggest that fewer than half the current fellows training at academic centers believe a career in academic medicine is important. Efforts to improve retention in academics should include focusing on mentorship, research, and career development during fellowship training and improving the image of academic physicians.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3932-3938
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Clinical Oncology
Volume29
Issue number29
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 11 2011

Fingerprint

Career Choice
Medical Oncology
Hematology
Mentors
National Cancer Institute (U.S.)
Medicine
Neoplasms
Research
Life Style
Decision Making
Teaching
Demography
Physicians

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cancer Research
  • Oncology

Cite this

Factors associated with the career choices of hematology and medical oncology fellows trained at academic institutions in the United States. / Horn, Leora; Koehler, Elizabeth; Gilbert, Jill; Johnson, David H.

In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol. 29, No. 29, 11.10.2011, p. 3932-3938.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{bfb75b05e5004dc99a063ca9269c3839,
title = "Factors associated with the career choices of hematology and medical oncology fellows trained at academic institutions in the United States",
abstract = "Purpose: Factors that influence hematology-oncology fellows' choice of academic medicine as a career are not well defined. We undertook a survey of hematology-oncology fellows training at cancer centers designated by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) to understand the factors fellows consider when making career decisions. Methods: Program directors at all NCI and NCCN cancer centers were invited to participate in the study. For the purpose of analysis, fellows were grouped into three groups on the basis of interest in an academic career. Demographic data were tested with the Kruskal-Wallis test and χ 2 test, and nondemographic data were tested by using the multiscale bootstrap method. Results: Twenty-eight of 56 eligible fellowship programs participated, and 236 fellows at participating institutions responded (62{\%} response rate). Approximately 60{\%} of fellows graduating from academic programs in the last 5 years chose academic career paths. Forty-nine percent of current fellows ranked an academic career as extremely important. Fellows choosing an academic career were more likely to have presented and published their research. Additional factors associated with choosing an academic career included factors related to mentorship, intellect, and practice type. Fellows selecting nonacademic careers prioritized lifestyle in their career decision. Conclusion: Recruitment into academic medicine is essential for continued progress in the field. Our data suggest that fewer than half the current fellows training at academic centers believe a career in academic medicine is important. Efforts to improve retention in academics should include focusing on mentorship, research, and career development during fellowship training and improving the image of academic physicians.",
author = "Leora Horn and Elizabeth Koehler and Jill Gilbert and Johnson, {David H.}",
year = "2011",
month = "10",
day = "11",
doi = "10.1200/JCO.2011.35.8663",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "3932--3938",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Oncology",
issn = "0732-183X",
publisher = "American Society of Clinical Oncology",
number = "29",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Factors associated with the career choices of hematology and medical oncology fellows trained at academic institutions in the United States

AU - Horn, Leora

AU - Koehler, Elizabeth

AU - Gilbert, Jill

AU - Johnson, David H.

PY - 2011/10/11

Y1 - 2011/10/11

N2 - Purpose: Factors that influence hematology-oncology fellows' choice of academic medicine as a career are not well defined. We undertook a survey of hematology-oncology fellows training at cancer centers designated by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) to understand the factors fellows consider when making career decisions. Methods: Program directors at all NCI and NCCN cancer centers were invited to participate in the study. For the purpose of analysis, fellows were grouped into three groups on the basis of interest in an academic career. Demographic data were tested with the Kruskal-Wallis test and χ 2 test, and nondemographic data were tested by using the multiscale bootstrap method. Results: Twenty-eight of 56 eligible fellowship programs participated, and 236 fellows at participating institutions responded (62% response rate). Approximately 60% of fellows graduating from academic programs in the last 5 years chose academic career paths. Forty-nine percent of current fellows ranked an academic career as extremely important. Fellows choosing an academic career were more likely to have presented and published their research. Additional factors associated with choosing an academic career included factors related to mentorship, intellect, and practice type. Fellows selecting nonacademic careers prioritized lifestyle in their career decision. Conclusion: Recruitment into academic medicine is essential for continued progress in the field. Our data suggest that fewer than half the current fellows training at academic centers believe a career in academic medicine is important. Efforts to improve retention in academics should include focusing on mentorship, research, and career development during fellowship training and improving the image of academic physicians.

AB - Purpose: Factors that influence hematology-oncology fellows' choice of academic medicine as a career are not well defined. We undertook a survey of hematology-oncology fellows training at cancer centers designated by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) to understand the factors fellows consider when making career decisions. Methods: Program directors at all NCI and NCCN cancer centers were invited to participate in the study. For the purpose of analysis, fellows were grouped into three groups on the basis of interest in an academic career. Demographic data were tested with the Kruskal-Wallis test and χ 2 test, and nondemographic data were tested by using the multiscale bootstrap method. Results: Twenty-eight of 56 eligible fellowship programs participated, and 236 fellows at participating institutions responded (62% response rate). Approximately 60% of fellows graduating from academic programs in the last 5 years chose academic career paths. Forty-nine percent of current fellows ranked an academic career as extremely important. Fellows choosing an academic career were more likely to have presented and published their research. Additional factors associated with choosing an academic career included factors related to mentorship, intellect, and practice type. Fellows selecting nonacademic careers prioritized lifestyle in their career decision. Conclusion: Recruitment into academic medicine is essential for continued progress in the field. Our data suggest that fewer than half the current fellows training at academic centers believe a career in academic medicine is important. Efforts to improve retention in academics should include focusing on mentorship, research, and career development during fellowship training and improving the image of academic physicians.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80053983039&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80053983039&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1200/JCO.2011.35.8663

DO - 10.1200/JCO.2011.35.8663

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 3932

EP - 3938

JO - Journal of Clinical Oncology

JF - Journal of Clinical Oncology

SN - 0732-183X

IS - 29

ER -