Factors Influencing the Rate of Lost to Followup after Suburethral Synthetic Sling Removal

Jeannine Foster, Alana Christie, Philippe Zimmern

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Introduction: We report on variables associated with lost to followup in women undergoing suburethral synthetic sling removal for complications of mid urethral slings. Methods: Following institutional review board approval a prospectively maintained database of consecutive women with nonneurogenic bladder who underwent 1 synthetic sling removal only was reviewed. Data reviewed by a third party investigator included distance traveled for appointment, marital status, employment status, if the patient received primary care from the institution, if patient's last followup visit was routine or for ongoing urological treatment, type of insurance coverage and UDI-6 (Urogenital Distress Inventory Short Form) questionnaire scores. Patients who did not reach a minimum followup length of 6 months were contacted via phone and interviewed using a standardized script. Results: From 2005 to 2015, 129 patients had a mean followup of 25 months (range 6 to 114). Of the 38 women lost to followup 19 could not be reached and there was 1 nonrecoverable loss due to death. There was a significant increase in patients returning for followup if they had ongoing treatment (p=0.0035). The most commonly reported reasons for lost to followup were distance to the care center and the patient being content with the postoperative outcome. UDI-6 total score decreased significantly after synthetic sling removal in the lost to followup population by an average of 4.2 points (p=0.0337). Conclusions: Geographical factors and ongoing treatment may explain lost to followup in women referred to a tertiary care center for complications of mid urethral slings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalUrology Practice
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Suburethral Slings
Insurance Coverage
Research Ethics Committees
Marital Status
Tertiary Care Centers
Primary Health Care
Patient Care
Appointments and Schedules
Urinary Bladder
Therapeutics
Research Personnel
Databases
Equipment and Supplies
Population

Keywords

  • Device removal
  • Lost to follow-up
  • Outcome assessment
  • Suburethral slings
  • Women's health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Factors Influencing the Rate of Lost to Followup after Suburethral Synthetic Sling Removal. / Foster, Jeannine; Christie, Alana; Zimmern, Philippe.

In: Urology Practice, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{da24fe3bb9c74732a0ba26e6db64c0b7,
title = "Factors Influencing the Rate of Lost to Followup after Suburethral Synthetic Sling Removal",
abstract = "Introduction: We report on variables associated with lost to followup in women undergoing suburethral synthetic sling removal for complications of mid urethral slings. Methods: Following institutional review board approval a prospectively maintained database of consecutive women with nonneurogenic bladder who underwent 1 synthetic sling removal only was reviewed. Data reviewed by a third party investigator included distance traveled for appointment, marital status, employment status, if the patient received primary care from the institution, if patient's last followup visit was routine or for ongoing urological treatment, type of insurance coverage and UDI-6 (Urogenital Distress Inventory Short Form) questionnaire scores. Patients who did not reach a minimum followup length of 6 months were contacted via phone and interviewed using a standardized script. Results: From 2005 to 2015, 129 patients had a mean followup of 25 months (range 6 to 114). Of the 38 women lost to followup 19 could not be reached and there was 1 nonrecoverable loss due to death. There was a significant increase in patients returning for followup if they had ongoing treatment (p=0.0035). The most commonly reported reasons for lost to followup were distance to the care center and the patient being content with the postoperative outcome. UDI-6 total score decreased significantly after synthetic sling removal in the lost to followup population by an average of 4.2 points (p=0.0337). Conclusions: Geographical factors and ongoing treatment may explain lost to followup in women referred to a tertiary care center for complications of mid urethral slings.",
keywords = "Device removal, Lost to follow-up, Outcome assessment, Suburethral slings, Women's health",
author = "Jeannine Foster and Alana Christie and Philippe Zimmern",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.urpr.2017.02.008",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Urology Practice",
issn = "2352-0779",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Factors Influencing the Rate of Lost to Followup after Suburethral Synthetic Sling Removal

AU - Foster, Jeannine

AU - Christie, Alana

AU - Zimmern, Philippe

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Introduction: We report on variables associated with lost to followup in women undergoing suburethral synthetic sling removal for complications of mid urethral slings. Methods: Following institutional review board approval a prospectively maintained database of consecutive women with nonneurogenic bladder who underwent 1 synthetic sling removal only was reviewed. Data reviewed by a third party investigator included distance traveled for appointment, marital status, employment status, if the patient received primary care from the institution, if patient's last followup visit was routine or for ongoing urological treatment, type of insurance coverage and UDI-6 (Urogenital Distress Inventory Short Form) questionnaire scores. Patients who did not reach a minimum followup length of 6 months were contacted via phone and interviewed using a standardized script. Results: From 2005 to 2015, 129 patients had a mean followup of 25 months (range 6 to 114). Of the 38 women lost to followup 19 could not be reached and there was 1 nonrecoverable loss due to death. There was a significant increase in patients returning for followup if they had ongoing treatment (p=0.0035). The most commonly reported reasons for lost to followup were distance to the care center and the patient being content with the postoperative outcome. UDI-6 total score decreased significantly after synthetic sling removal in the lost to followup population by an average of 4.2 points (p=0.0337). Conclusions: Geographical factors and ongoing treatment may explain lost to followup in women referred to a tertiary care center for complications of mid urethral slings.

AB - Introduction: We report on variables associated with lost to followup in women undergoing suburethral synthetic sling removal for complications of mid urethral slings. Methods: Following institutional review board approval a prospectively maintained database of consecutive women with nonneurogenic bladder who underwent 1 synthetic sling removal only was reviewed. Data reviewed by a third party investigator included distance traveled for appointment, marital status, employment status, if the patient received primary care from the institution, if patient's last followup visit was routine or for ongoing urological treatment, type of insurance coverage and UDI-6 (Urogenital Distress Inventory Short Form) questionnaire scores. Patients who did not reach a minimum followup length of 6 months were contacted via phone and interviewed using a standardized script. Results: From 2005 to 2015, 129 patients had a mean followup of 25 months (range 6 to 114). Of the 38 women lost to followup 19 could not be reached and there was 1 nonrecoverable loss due to death. There was a significant increase in patients returning for followup if they had ongoing treatment (p=0.0035). The most commonly reported reasons for lost to followup were distance to the care center and the patient being content with the postoperative outcome. UDI-6 total score decreased significantly after synthetic sling removal in the lost to followup population by an average of 4.2 points (p=0.0337). Conclusions: Geographical factors and ongoing treatment may explain lost to followup in women referred to a tertiary care center for complications of mid urethral slings.

KW - Device removal

KW - Lost to follow-up

KW - Outcome assessment

KW - Suburethral slings

KW - Women's health

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041305308&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85041305308&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.urpr.2017.02.008

DO - 10.1016/j.urpr.2017.02.008

M3 - Article

JO - Urology Practice

JF - Urology Practice

SN - 2352-0779

ER -