Fast-track cardiac anesthesia: Use of remifentanil combined with intrathecal morphine as an alternative to sufentanil during desflurane anesthesia

Eduardo Zarate, Paige Latham, Paul F. White, Robert Bossard, Lisa Morse, Linda K. Douning, Chen Shi, Lei Chi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

63 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this cardiac fast-track study was to evaluate the use of remifentanil (R) combined with intrathecal (IT) morphine as an alternative to sufentanil (S) during desflurane anesthesia with respect to postoperative pain control. Prior to entering the operating room, patients in the R group (n = 20) received morphine, 8 μg/kg IT. Anesthesia was induced using a standardized anesthetic technique in all patients. In the R group, anesthesia was maintained with R, 0.1 μg·kg-1·min-1 in combination with desflurane 3-10%. In the S group (n = 20), patients received S 0.3 μg·kg-1·h-1 and desflurane 3-10%. There were no differences between the two groups with respect to time from arrival in the intensive care unit to tracheal extubation (5.1 ± 4.3 h vs 5.8 ± 6.7 h for R and S groups, respectively). After extubation, patients in the R group had significantly lower visual analog pain scores, reduced patient-controlled analgesic requirements, and greater satisfaction with their perioperative pain management, compared with patients in the S group. We conclude that R combined with IT morphine provided superior pain control after cardiac surgery compared with a S-based general anesthetic technique.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)283-287
Number of pages5
JournalAnesthesia and Analgesia
Volume91
Issue number2
StatePublished - 2000

Fingerprint

Sufentanil
Morphine
Anesthesia
Airway Extubation
Pain
General Anesthetics
Operating Rooms
Pain Management
Postoperative Pain
Thoracic Surgery
Intensive Care Units
Analgesics
Anesthetics
remifentanil
desflurane

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Fast-track cardiac anesthesia : Use of remifentanil combined with intrathecal morphine as an alternative to sufentanil during desflurane anesthesia. / Zarate, Eduardo; Latham, Paige; White, Paul F.; Bossard, Robert; Morse, Lisa; Douning, Linda K.; Shi, Chen; Chi, Lei.

In: Anesthesia and Analgesia, Vol. 91, No. 2, 2000, p. 283-287.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f869a42de43e46cfa1865d8721ac829a,
title = "Fast-track cardiac anesthesia: Use of remifentanil combined with intrathecal morphine as an alternative to sufentanil during desflurane anesthesia",
abstract = "The purpose of this cardiac fast-track study was to evaluate the use of remifentanil (R) combined with intrathecal (IT) morphine as an alternative to sufentanil (S) during desflurane anesthesia with respect to postoperative pain control. Prior to entering the operating room, patients in the R group (n = 20) received morphine, 8 μg/kg IT. Anesthesia was induced using a standardized anesthetic technique in all patients. In the R group, anesthesia was maintained with R, 0.1 μg·kg-1·min-1 in combination with desflurane 3-10{\%}. In the S group (n = 20), patients received S 0.3 μg·kg-1·h-1 and desflurane 3-10{\%}. There were no differences between the two groups with respect to time from arrival in the intensive care unit to tracheal extubation (5.1 ± 4.3 h vs 5.8 ± 6.7 h for R and S groups, respectively). After extubation, patients in the R group had significantly lower visual analog pain scores, reduced patient-controlled analgesic requirements, and greater satisfaction with their perioperative pain management, compared with patients in the S group. We conclude that R combined with IT morphine provided superior pain control after cardiac surgery compared with a S-based general anesthetic technique.",
author = "Eduardo Zarate and Paige Latham and White, {Paul F.} and Robert Bossard and Lisa Morse and Douning, {Linda K.} and Chen Shi and Lei Chi",
year = "2000",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "91",
pages = "283--287",
journal = "Anesthesia and Analgesia",
issn = "0003-2999",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fast-track cardiac anesthesia

T2 - Use of remifentanil combined with intrathecal morphine as an alternative to sufentanil during desflurane anesthesia

AU - Zarate, Eduardo

AU - Latham, Paige

AU - White, Paul F.

AU - Bossard, Robert

AU - Morse, Lisa

AU - Douning, Linda K.

AU - Shi, Chen

AU - Chi, Lei

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - The purpose of this cardiac fast-track study was to evaluate the use of remifentanil (R) combined with intrathecal (IT) morphine as an alternative to sufentanil (S) during desflurane anesthesia with respect to postoperative pain control. Prior to entering the operating room, patients in the R group (n = 20) received morphine, 8 μg/kg IT. Anesthesia was induced using a standardized anesthetic technique in all patients. In the R group, anesthesia was maintained with R, 0.1 μg·kg-1·min-1 in combination with desflurane 3-10%. In the S group (n = 20), patients received S 0.3 μg·kg-1·h-1 and desflurane 3-10%. There were no differences between the two groups with respect to time from arrival in the intensive care unit to tracheal extubation (5.1 ± 4.3 h vs 5.8 ± 6.7 h for R and S groups, respectively). After extubation, patients in the R group had significantly lower visual analog pain scores, reduced patient-controlled analgesic requirements, and greater satisfaction with their perioperative pain management, compared with patients in the S group. We conclude that R combined with IT morphine provided superior pain control after cardiac surgery compared with a S-based general anesthetic technique.

AB - The purpose of this cardiac fast-track study was to evaluate the use of remifentanil (R) combined with intrathecal (IT) morphine as an alternative to sufentanil (S) during desflurane anesthesia with respect to postoperative pain control. Prior to entering the operating room, patients in the R group (n = 20) received morphine, 8 μg/kg IT. Anesthesia was induced using a standardized anesthetic technique in all patients. In the R group, anesthesia was maintained with R, 0.1 μg·kg-1·min-1 in combination with desflurane 3-10%. In the S group (n = 20), patients received S 0.3 μg·kg-1·h-1 and desflurane 3-10%. There were no differences between the two groups with respect to time from arrival in the intensive care unit to tracheal extubation (5.1 ± 4.3 h vs 5.8 ± 6.7 h for R and S groups, respectively). After extubation, patients in the R group had significantly lower visual analog pain scores, reduced patient-controlled analgesic requirements, and greater satisfaction with their perioperative pain management, compared with patients in the S group. We conclude that R combined with IT morphine provided superior pain control after cardiac surgery compared with a S-based general anesthetic technique.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033868773&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033868773&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 10910832

AN - SCOPUS:0033868773

VL - 91

SP - 283

EP - 287

JO - Anesthesia and Analgesia

JF - Anesthesia and Analgesia

SN - 0003-2999

IS - 2

ER -