Femoral Neck Stress Fracture

Lindsay N. Ramey, Kelly C. McInnis, William E. Palmer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Limited research is available regarding return-to-running (RTR) time after femoral neck stress fractures. While studies have shown the prognostic value of image-based grading scales for stress fractures at other sites, few have included femoral neck stress fractures. Purpose: To determine if the grade of femoral neck stress fractures based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characteristics correlates with RTR time. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: This study included 24 patients (mean age, 32.9 years; range, 18-51 years) who were diagnosed with 27 femoral neck stress fractures by MRI from 2009 to 2015 at a single sports medicine clinic. All fractures were compression sided and were treated nonoperatively. Charts were reviewed for patient demographics and RTR time. Images were graded from 1 to 4 using the Arendt stress fracture severity scale. Statistical analysis was performed using survival analysis and Cox proportional hazard model to compare the RTR time between grades. Cox regression was repeated, adjusted for age, bone mineral density (BMD), and body mass index (BMI). Results: The mean (±standard error of the mean) RTR time in weeks for patients with fractures graded 1 to 4 was 7.4 ± 2.7 (range, 4-11), 13.8 ± 3.8 (range, 6-21), 14.7 ± 3.5 (range, 8.5-24), and 17.5 ± 3.4 (range, 10-32), respectively. Survival analysis indicated that there was a statistically significant effect of fracture grade on RTR time (P =.0065). The Cox model indicated a statistically significant difference in RTR time between grades 1 and 2 (P =.036), 1 and 3 (P =.014), and 1 and 4 (P =.002). The unadjusted hazard ratio was significant (P =.037). There were no statistically significant differences between the remaining grades (P =.82 for grades 2 and 3, P =.37 for grades 2 and 4, and P =.31 for grades 3 and 4). Age (P =.71) and BMD (P =.81) did not have an effect on RTR time. The hazard ratio remained significant (P =.05) after adjusting for age and BMD. BMI tended to have an effect on RTR time (P =.09). After adding BMI to the adjustment, the hazard ratio decreased in significance (P =.13), although sample size also decreased. Conclusion: Grade 2 to 4 femoral neck stress fractures require longer RTR time than do grade 1 injuries. Patients with lower BMI tend to require a longer RTR time.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2122-2129
Number of pages8
JournalAmerican Journal of Sports Medicine
Volume44
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2016

Fingerprint

Stress Fractures
Femoral Neck Fractures
Body Mass Index
Bone Density
Survival Analysis
Proportional Hazards Models
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Compression Fractures
Sports Medicine
Sample Size
Cohort Studies
Demography

Keywords

  • femoral neck stress fracture
  • hip
  • magnetic resonance imaging
  • rehabilitation
  • stress fractures

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Femoral Neck Stress Fracture. / Ramey, Lindsay N.; McInnis, Kelly C.; Palmer, William E.

In: American Journal of Sports Medicine, Vol. 44, No. 8, 01.08.2016, p. 2122-2129.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ramey, Lindsay N. ; McInnis, Kelly C. ; Palmer, William E. / Femoral Neck Stress Fracture. In: American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2016 ; Vol. 44, No. 8. pp. 2122-2129.
@article{7dbeb967a2424a3eac61c7e8c37a86e0,
title = "Femoral Neck Stress Fracture",
abstract = "Background: Limited research is available regarding return-to-running (RTR) time after femoral neck stress fractures. While studies have shown the prognostic value of image-based grading scales for stress fractures at other sites, few have included femoral neck stress fractures. Purpose: To determine if the grade of femoral neck stress fractures based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characteristics correlates with RTR time. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: This study included 24 patients (mean age, 32.9 years; range, 18-51 years) who were diagnosed with 27 femoral neck stress fractures by MRI from 2009 to 2015 at a single sports medicine clinic. All fractures were compression sided and were treated nonoperatively. Charts were reviewed for patient demographics and RTR time. Images were graded from 1 to 4 using the Arendt stress fracture severity scale. Statistical analysis was performed using survival analysis and Cox proportional hazard model to compare the RTR time between grades. Cox regression was repeated, adjusted for age, bone mineral density (BMD), and body mass index (BMI). Results: The mean (±standard error of the mean) RTR time in weeks for patients with fractures graded 1 to 4 was 7.4 ± 2.7 (range, 4-11), 13.8 ± 3.8 (range, 6-21), 14.7 ± 3.5 (range, 8.5-24), and 17.5 ± 3.4 (range, 10-32), respectively. Survival analysis indicated that there was a statistically significant effect of fracture grade on RTR time (P =.0065). The Cox model indicated a statistically significant difference in RTR time between grades 1 and 2 (P =.036), 1 and 3 (P =.014), and 1 and 4 (P =.002). The unadjusted hazard ratio was significant (P =.037). There were no statistically significant differences between the remaining grades (P =.82 for grades 2 and 3, P =.37 for grades 2 and 4, and P =.31 for grades 3 and 4). Age (P =.71) and BMD (P =.81) did not have an effect on RTR time. The hazard ratio remained significant (P =.05) after adjusting for age and BMD. BMI tended to have an effect on RTR time (P =.09). After adding BMI to the adjustment, the hazard ratio decreased in significance (P =.13), although sample size also decreased. Conclusion: Grade 2 to 4 femoral neck stress fractures require longer RTR time than do grade 1 injuries. Patients with lower BMI tend to require a longer RTR time.",
keywords = "femoral neck stress fracture, hip, magnetic resonance imaging, rehabilitation, stress fractures",
author = "Ramey, {Lindsay N.} and McInnis, {Kelly C.} and Palmer, {William E.}",
year = "2016",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0363546516648319",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "44",
pages = "2122--2129",
journal = "American Journal of Sports Medicine",
issn = "0363-5465",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Femoral Neck Stress Fracture

AU - Ramey, Lindsay N.

AU - McInnis, Kelly C.

AU - Palmer, William E.

PY - 2016/8/1

Y1 - 2016/8/1

N2 - Background: Limited research is available regarding return-to-running (RTR) time after femoral neck stress fractures. While studies have shown the prognostic value of image-based grading scales for stress fractures at other sites, few have included femoral neck stress fractures. Purpose: To determine if the grade of femoral neck stress fractures based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characteristics correlates with RTR time. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: This study included 24 patients (mean age, 32.9 years; range, 18-51 years) who were diagnosed with 27 femoral neck stress fractures by MRI from 2009 to 2015 at a single sports medicine clinic. All fractures were compression sided and were treated nonoperatively. Charts were reviewed for patient demographics and RTR time. Images were graded from 1 to 4 using the Arendt stress fracture severity scale. Statistical analysis was performed using survival analysis and Cox proportional hazard model to compare the RTR time between grades. Cox regression was repeated, adjusted for age, bone mineral density (BMD), and body mass index (BMI). Results: The mean (±standard error of the mean) RTR time in weeks for patients with fractures graded 1 to 4 was 7.4 ± 2.7 (range, 4-11), 13.8 ± 3.8 (range, 6-21), 14.7 ± 3.5 (range, 8.5-24), and 17.5 ± 3.4 (range, 10-32), respectively. Survival analysis indicated that there was a statistically significant effect of fracture grade on RTR time (P =.0065). The Cox model indicated a statistically significant difference in RTR time between grades 1 and 2 (P =.036), 1 and 3 (P =.014), and 1 and 4 (P =.002). The unadjusted hazard ratio was significant (P =.037). There were no statistically significant differences between the remaining grades (P =.82 for grades 2 and 3, P =.37 for grades 2 and 4, and P =.31 for grades 3 and 4). Age (P =.71) and BMD (P =.81) did not have an effect on RTR time. The hazard ratio remained significant (P =.05) after adjusting for age and BMD. BMI tended to have an effect on RTR time (P =.09). After adding BMI to the adjustment, the hazard ratio decreased in significance (P =.13), although sample size also decreased. Conclusion: Grade 2 to 4 femoral neck stress fractures require longer RTR time than do grade 1 injuries. Patients with lower BMI tend to require a longer RTR time.

AB - Background: Limited research is available regarding return-to-running (RTR) time after femoral neck stress fractures. While studies have shown the prognostic value of image-based grading scales for stress fractures at other sites, few have included femoral neck stress fractures. Purpose: To determine if the grade of femoral neck stress fractures based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characteristics correlates with RTR time. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: This study included 24 patients (mean age, 32.9 years; range, 18-51 years) who were diagnosed with 27 femoral neck stress fractures by MRI from 2009 to 2015 at a single sports medicine clinic. All fractures were compression sided and were treated nonoperatively. Charts were reviewed for patient demographics and RTR time. Images were graded from 1 to 4 using the Arendt stress fracture severity scale. Statistical analysis was performed using survival analysis and Cox proportional hazard model to compare the RTR time between grades. Cox regression was repeated, adjusted for age, bone mineral density (BMD), and body mass index (BMI). Results: The mean (±standard error of the mean) RTR time in weeks for patients with fractures graded 1 to 4 was 7.4 ± 2.7 (range, 4-11), 13.8 ± 3.8 (range, 6-21), 14.7 ± 3.5 (range, 8.5-24), and 17.5 ± 3.4 (range, 10-32), respectively. Survival analysis indicated that there was a statistically significant effect of fracture grade on RTR time (P =.0065). The Cox model indicated a statistically significant difference in RTR time between grades 1 and 2 (P =.036), 1 and 3 (P =.014), and 1 and 4 (P =.002). The unadjusted hazard ratio was significant (P =.037). There were no statistically significant differences between the remaining grades (P =.82 for grades 2 and 3, P =.37 for grades 2 and 4, and P =.31 for grades 3 and 4). Age (P =.71) and BMD (P =.81) did not have an effect on RTR time. The hazard ratio remained significant (P =.05) after adjusting for age and BMD. BMI tended to have an effect on RTR time (P =.09). After adding BMI to the adjustment, the hazard ratio decreased in significance (P =.13), although sample size also decreased. Conclusion: Grade 2 to 4 femoral neck stress fractures require longer RTR time than do grade 1 injuries. Patients with lower BMI tend to require a longer RTR time.

KW - femoral neck stress fracture

KW - hip

KW - magnetic resonance imaging

KW - rehabilitation

KW - stress fractures

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84982805333&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84982805333&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0363546516648319

DO - 10.1177/0363546516648319

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 2122

EP - 2129

JO - American Journal of Sports Medicine

JF - American Journal of Sports Medicine

SN - 0363-5465

IS - 8

ER -