Fetal sheep development on ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging: A standard for the in utero assessment of models of congenital abnormalities

Valerie L. Ward, Judy A. Estroff, Hiep T. Nguyen, Yegappan Lakshmanan, Alison Hayward, Diego Jaramillo, David Zurakowski, Patricia S. Dunning, Craig A Peters, Carol E. Barnewolt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: To establish normative data for the size, conspicuity, and imaging characteristics of normal developing fetal sheep organs on ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. Methods: US and MR images often normal pregnant sheep, at 40, 65, 90, 115, and 140 gestational days (term = 145 days), were scored for organ conspicuity and imaging characteristics. Imaging biometry was correlated with specimens. Gestational age-based growth parameters were modeled using regression. Results: Imaging biometry showed excellent correlation with specimens. Kidney, bladder, stomach, lung, liver, and spine were seen well from 65 days to term by US. More organs were consistently visible from 90 days to term by MR than by US. Most organ imaging characteristics tended not to change throughout gestation. Conclusion: Normal fetal sheep biometry, organ conspicuity, and imaging characteristics are established for US and MR and have potential use for the in utero assessment of sheep models of congenital abnormalities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)444-457
Number of pages14
JournalFetal Diagnosis and Therapy
Volume21
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2006

Keywords

  • Anatomy
  • Animal investigations
  • Congenital
  • Fetus
  • MR imaging
  • Obstetrics
  • Pediatrics
  • Pregnancy
  • Ultrasound

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Embryology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Fetal sheep development on ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging: A standard for the in utero assessment of models of congenital abnormalities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this