Fifty shades of gradients: Does the pressure gradient in venous sinus stenting for idiopathic intracranial hypertension matter? A systematic review

Cameron M. McDougall, Vin Shen Ban, Jeffrey Beecher, Glenn L Pride, Babu G Welch

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE The role of venous sinus stenting (VSS) for idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is not well understood. The aim of this systematic review is to attempt to identify subsets of patients with IIH who will benefit from VSS based on the pressure gradients of their venous sinus stenosis. METHODS MEDLINE/PubMed was searched for studies reporting venous pressure gradients across the stenotic segment of the venous sinus, pre- and post-stent pressure gradients, and clinical outcomes after VSS. Findings are reported according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. RESULTS From 32 eligible studies, a total of 186 patients were included in the analysis. Patients who had favorable outcomes had higher mean pressure gradients (22.8 ± 11.5 mm Hg vs 17.4 ± 8.0 mm Hg, p = 0.033) and higher changes in pressure gradients after stent placement (19.4 ± 10.0 mm Hg vs 12.0 ± 6.0 mm Hg, p = 0.006) compared with those with unfavorable outcomes. The post-stent pressure gradients between the 2 groups were not significantly different (2.8 ± 4.0 mm Hg vs 2.7 ± 2.0 mm Hg, p = 0.934). In a multivariate stepwise logistic regression controlling for age, sex, body mass index, CSF opening pressure, pre-stent pressure gradient, and post-stent pressure gradient, the change in pressure gradient with stent placement was found to be an independent predictor of favorable outcome (p = 0.028). Using a pressure gradient of 21 as a cutoff, 81/86 (94.2%) of patients with a gradient > 21 achieved favorable outcomes, compared with 82/100 (82.0%) of patients with a gradient ≤ 21 (p = 0.022). CONCLUSIONS There appears to be a relationship between the pressure gradient of venous sinus stenosis and the success of VSS in IIH. A randomized controlled trial would help elucidate this relationship and potentially guide patient selection.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)999-1005
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Neurosurgery
Volume130
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2019

Fingerprint

Pseudotumor Cerebri
Pressure
Stents
Venous Pressure
Pathologic Constriction
PubMed
MEDLINE
Patient Selection
Meta-Analysis
Body Mass Index
Randomized Controlled Trials
Logistic Models
Guidelines

Keywords

  • Idiopathic intracranial hypertension
  • Interventional neurosurgery
  • Pressure gradient
  • Pseudotumor cerebri
  • Venous sinus stenting
  • Venous stenosis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Fifty shades of gradients : Does the pressure gradient in venous sinus stenting for idiopathic intracranial hypertension matter? A systematic review. / McDougall, Cameron M.; Ban, Vin Shen; Beecher, Jeffrey; Pride, Glenn L; Welch, Babu G.

In: Journal of Neurosurgery, Vol. 130, No. 3, 01.03.2019, p. 999-1005.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{e16c4e13fefb4ab9b9ded5494b2d9da0,
title = "Fifty shades of gradients: Does the pressure gradient in venous sinus stenting for idiopathic intracranial hypertension matter? A systematic review",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE The role of venous sinus stenting (VSS) for idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is not well understood. The aim of this systematic review is to attempt to identify subsets of patients with IIH who will benefit from VSS based on the pressure gradients of their venous sinus stenosis. METHODS MEDLINE/PubMed was searched for studies reporting venous pressure gradients across the stenotic segment of the venous sinus, pre- and post-stent pressure gradients, and clinical outcomes after VSS. Findings are reported according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. RESULTS From 32 eligible studies, a total of 186 patients were included in the analysis. Patients who had favorable outcomes had higher mean pressure gradients (22.8 ± 11.5 mm Hg vs 17.4 ± 8.0 mm Hg, p = 0.033) and higher changes in pressure gradients after stent placement (19.4 ± 10.0 mm Hg vs 12.0 ± 6.0 mm Hg, p = 0.006) compared with those with unfavorable outcomes. The post-stent pressure gradients between the 2 groups were not significantly different (2.8 ± 4.0 mm Hg vs 2.7 ± 2.0 mm Hg, p = 0.934). In a multivariate stepwise logistic regression controlling for age, sex, body mass index, CSF opening pressure, pre-stent pressure gradient, and post-stent pressure gradient, the change in pressure gradient with stent placement was found to be an independent predictor of favorable outcome (p = 0.028). Using a pressure gradient of 21 as a cutoff, 81/86 (94.2{\%}) of patients with a gradient > 21 achieved favorable outcomes, compared with 82/100 (82.0{\%}) of patients with a gradient ≤ 21 (p = 0.022). CONCLUSIONS There appears to be a relationship between the pressure gradient of venous sinus stenosis and the success of VSS in IIH. A randomized controlled trial would help elucidate this relationship and potentially guide patient selection.",
keywords = "Idiopathic intracranial hypertension, Interventional neurosurgery, Pressure gradient, Pseudotumor cerebri, Venous sinus stenting, Venous stenosis",
author = "McDougall, {Cameron M.} and Ban, {Vin Shen} and Jeffrey Beecher and Pride, {Glenn L} and Welch, {Babu G}",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3171/2017.8.JNS17459",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "130",
pages = "999--1005",
journal = "Journal of Neurosurgery",
issn = "0022-3085",
publisher = "American Association of Neurological Surgeons",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fifty shades of gradients

T2 - Does the pressure gradient in venous sinus stenting for idiopathic intracranial hypertension matter? A systematic review

AU - McDougall, Cameron M.

AU - Ban, Vin Shen

AU - Beecher, Jeffrey

AU - Pride, Glenn L

AU - Welch, Babu G

PY - 2019/3/1

Y1 - 2019/3/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE The role of venous sinus stenting (VSS) for idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is not well understood. The aim of this systematic review is to attempt to identify subsets of patients with IIH who will benefit from VSS based on the pressure gradients of their venous sinus stenosis. METHODS MEDLINE/PubMed was searched for studies reporting venous pressure gradients across the stenotic segment of the venous sinus, pre- and post-stent pressure gradients, and clinical outcomes after VSS. Findings are reported according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. RESULTS From 32 eligible studies, a total of 186 patients were included in the analysis. Patients who had favorable outcomes had higher mean pressure gradients (22.8 ± 11.5 mm Hg vs 17.4 ± 8.0 mm Hg, p = 0.033) and higher changes in pressure gradients after stent placement (19.4 ± 10.0 mm Hg vs 12.0 ± 6.0 mm Hg, p = 0.006) compared with those with unfavorable outcomes. The post-stent pressure gradients between the 2 groups were not significantly different (2.8 ± 4.0 mm Hg vs 2.7 ± 2.0 mm Hg, p = 0.934). In a multivariate stepwise logistic regression controlling for age, sex, body mass index, CSF opening pressure, pre-stent pressure gradient, and post-stent pressure gradient, the change in pressure gradient with stent placement was found to be an independent predictor of favorable outcome (p = 0.028). Using a pressure gradient of 21 as a cutoff, 81/86 (94.2%) of patients with a gradient > 21 achieved favorable outcomes, compared with 82/100 (82.0%) of patients with a gradient ≤ 21 (p = 0.022). CONCLUSIONS There appears to be a relationship between the pressure gradient of venous sinus stenosis and the success of VSS in IIH. A randomized controlled trial would help elucidate this relationship and potentially guide patient selection.

AB - OBJECTIVE The role of venous sinus stenting (VSS) for idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is not well understood. The aim of this systematic review is to attempt to identify subsets of patients with IIH who will benefit from VSS based on the pressure gradients of their venous sinus stenosis. METHODS MEDLINE/PubMed was searched for studies reporting venous pressure gradients across the stenotic segment of the venous sinus, pre- and post-stent pressure gradients, and clinical outcomes after VSS. Findings are reported according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. RESULTS From 32 eligible studies, a total of 186 patients were included in the analysis. Patients who had favorable outcomes had higher mean pressure gradients (22.8 ± 11.5 mm Hg vs 17.4 ± 8.0 mm Hg, p = 0.033) and higher changes in pressure gradients after stent placement (19.4 ± 10.0 mm Hg vs 12.0 ± 6.0 mm Hg, p = 0.006) compared with those with unfavorable outcomes. The post-stent pressure gradients between the 2 groups were not significantly different (2.8 ± 4.0 mm Hg vs 2.7 ± 2.0 mm Hg, p = 0.934). In a multivariate stepwise logistic regression controlling for age, sex, body mass index, CSF opening pressure, pre-stent pressure gradient, and post-stent pressure gradient, the change in pressure gradient with stent placement was found to be an independent predictor of favorable outcome (p = 0.028). Using a pressure gradient of 21 as a cutoff, 81/86 (94.2%) of patients with a gradient > 21 achieved favorable outcomes, compared with 82/100 (82.0%) of patients with a gradient ≤ 21 (p = 0.022). CONCLUSIONS There appears to be a relationship between the pressure gradient of venous sinus stenosis and the success of VSS in IIH. A randomized controlled trial would help elucidate this relationship and potentially guide patient selection.

KW - Idiopathic intracranial hypertension

KW - Interventional neurosurgery

KW - Pressure gradient

KW - Pseudotumor cerebri

KW - Venous sinus stenting

KW - Venous stenosis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064843510&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064843510&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3171/2017.8.JNS17459

DO - 10.3171/2017.8.JNS17459

M3 - Review article

C2 - 29498569

AN - SCOPUS:85064843510

VL - 130

SP - 999

EP - 1005

JO - Journal of Neurosurgery

JF - Journal of Neurosurgery

SN - 0022-3085

IS - 3

ER -