Five years post-DORA: Promoting best practices for research assessment

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA) was penned 5 years ago to articulate best practices for how we communicate and judge our scientific contributions. In particular, it adamantly declared that Journal Impact Factor (JIF) should never be used as a surrogate measure of the quality of individual research contributions, or for hiring, promotion, or funding decisions. Since then, a heightened awareness of the damaging practice of using JIFs as a proxy for the quality of individual papers, and to assess an individual's or institution's accomplishments has led to changes in policy and the design and application of best practices to more accurately assess the quality and impact of our research. Herein I summarize the considerable progress made and remaining challenges that must be met to ensure a fair and meritocratic approach to research assessment and the advancement of research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2941-2944
Number of pages4
JournalMolecular Biology of the Cell
Volume28
Issue number22
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2017

Fingerprint

Practice Guidelines
Research
Journal Impact Factor
San Francisco
Proxy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Molecular Biology
  • Cell Biology

Cite this

Five years post-DORA : Promoting best practices for research assessment. / Schmid, Sandra L.

In: Molecular Biology of the Cell, Vol. 28, No. 22, 01.11.2017, p. 2941-2944.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{854b0357ed8b42afbab43bab1848876c,
title = "Five years post-DORA: Promoting best practices for research assessment",
abstract = "The San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA) was penned 5 years ago to articulate best practices for how we communicate and judge our scientific contributions. In particular, it adamantly declared that Journal Impact Factor (JIF) should never be used as a surrogate measure of the quality of individual research contributions, or for hiring, promotion, or funding decisions. Since then, a heightened awareness of the damaging practice of using JIFs as a proxy for the quality of individual papers, and to assess an individual's or institution's accomplishments has led to changes in policy and the design and application of best practices to more accurately assess the quality and impact of our research. Herein I summarize the considerable progress made and remaining challenges that must be met to ensure a fair and meritocratic approach to research assessment and the advancement of research.",
author = "Schmid, {Sandra L.}",
year = "2017",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1091/mbc.E17-08-0534",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "2941--2944",
journal = "Molecular Biology of the Cell",
issn = "1059-1524",
publisher = "American Society for Cell Biology",
number = "22",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Five years post-DORA

T2 - Promoting best practices for research assessment

AU - Schmid, Sandra L.

PY - 2017/11/1

Y1 - 2017/11/1

N2 - The San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA) was penned 5 years ago to articulate best practices for how we communicate and judge our scientific contributions. In particular, it adamantly declared that Journal Impact Factor (JIF) should never be used as a surrogate measure of the quality of individual research contributions, or for hiring, promotion, or funding decisions. Since then, a heightened awareness of the damaging practice of using JIFs as a proxy for the quality of individual papers, and to assess an individual's or institution's accomplishments has led to changes in policy and the design and application of best practices to more accurately assess the quality and impact of our research. Herein I summarize the considerable progress made and remaining challenges that must be met to ensure a fair and meritocratic approach to research assessment and the advancement of research.

AB - The San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA) was penned 5 years ago to articulate best practices for how we communicate and judge our scientific contributions. In particular, it adamantly declared that Journal Impact Factor (JIF) should never be used as a surrogate measure of the quality of individual research contributions, or for hiring, promotion, or funding decisions. Since then, a heightened awareness of the damaging practice of using JIFs as a proxy for the quality of individual papers, and to assess an individual's or institution's accomplishments has led to changes in policy and the design and application of best practices to more accurately assess the quality and impact of our research. Herein I summarize the considerable progress made and remaining challenges that must be met to ensure a fair and meritocratic approach to research assessment and the advancement of research.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85032643309&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85032643309&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1091/mbc.E17-08-0534

DO - 10.1091/mbc.E17-08-0534

M3 - Review article

C2 - 29084913

AN - SCOPUS:85032643309

VL - 28

SP - 2941

EP - 2944

JO - Molecular Biology of the Cell

JF - Molecular Biology of the Cell

SN - 1059-1524

IS - 22

ER -