Fluid resuscitation of the patient with major trauma

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Current reviews and consensus documents now recommend a more discriminating approach to the traditional practices of delivering liberal infusions of intravenous fluid to all major trauma patients with suspected or known major hemorrhage. The evolving evidence suggests that aggressive fluid resuscitation prior to hemostasis leads to additional bleeding through hydraulic acceleration of hemorrhage, soft clot dissolution, and dilution of clotting factors. Aggressive preoperative fluid infusion is still considered appropriate for unconscious patients without palpable blood pressure or for those with controllable hemorrhage (e.g. isolated extremity or head injury), However, the latest recommendations are to limit or delay intravenous fluid resuscitation preoperatively in those with uncontrollable hemorrhage (e.g. those with penetrating torso injuries), even if they are hypoperfusing. Although most clinicians still generally support fluid resuscitation for multisystem blunt trauma, particularly with head injury, the most recent experimental data have begun to challenge this traditional practice as well, suggesting a 'slow infusion' approach when there is risk for uncontrolled internal bleeding. By providing oxygen delivery with slow, limited infusion, new hemoglobin-based oxygen carriers might help to resolve the current dilemma of having to limit preoperative resuscitation when there is risk of uncontrolled hemorrhage.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)173-178
Number of pages6
JournalCurrent Opinion in Anaesthesiology
Volume15
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2002

Fingerprint

Resuscitation
Hemorrhage
Wounds and Injuries
Craniocerebral Trauma
Oxygen
Torso
Blood Coagulation Factors
Hemostasis
Intravenous Infusions
Hemoglobins
Extremities
Blood Pressure

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Fluid resuscitation of the patient with major trauma. / Fowler, Raymond; Pepe, Paul E.

In: Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology, Vol. 15, No. 2, 2002, p. 173-178.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d9222637cd444de498ad0d93fdd6ef2c,
title = "Fluid resuscitation of the patient with major trauma",
abstract = "Current reviews and consensus documents now recommend a more discriminating approach to the traditional practices of delivering liberal infusions of intravenous fluid to all major trauma patients with suspected or known major hemorrhage. The evolving evidence suggests that aggressive fluid resuscitation prior to hemostasis leads to additional bleeding through hydraulic acceleration of hemorrhage, soft clot dissolution, and dilution of clotting factors. Aggressive preoperative fluid infusion is still considered appropriate for unconscious patients without palpable blood pressure or for those with controllable hemorrhage (e.g. isolated extremity or head injury), However, the latest recommendations are to limit or delay intravenous fluid resuscitation preoperatively in those with uncontrollable hemorrhage (e.g. those with penetrating torso injuries), even if they are hypoperfusing. Although most clinicians still generally support fluid resuscitation for multisystem blunt trauma, particularly with head injury, the most recent experimental data have begun to challenge this traditional practice as well, suggesting a 'slow infusion' approach when there is risk for uncontrolled internal bleeding. By providing oxygen delivery with slow, limited infusion, new hemoglobin-based oxygen carriers might help to resolve the current dilemma of having to limit preoperative resuscitation when there is risk of uncontrolled hemorrhage.",
author = "Raymond Fowler and Pepe, {Paul E.}",
year = "2002",
doi = "10.1097/00001503-200204000-00006",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "173--178",
journal = "Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology",
issn = "0952-7907",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fluid resuscitation of the patient with major trauma

AU - Fowler, Raymond

AU - Pepe, Paul E.

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - Current reviews and consensus documents now recommend a more discriminating approach to the traditional practices of delivering liberal infusions of intravenous fluid to all major trauma patients with suspected or known major hemorrhage. The evolving evidence suggests that aggressive fluid resuscitation prior to hemostasis leads to additional bleeding through hydraulic acceleration of hemorrhage, soft clot dissolution, and dilution of clotting factors. Aggressive preoperative fluid infusion is still considered appropriate for unconscious patients without palpable blood pressure or for those with controllable hemorrhage (e.g. isolated extremity or head injury), However, the latest recommendations are to limit or delay intravenous fluid resuscitation preoperatively in those with uncontrollable hemorrhage (e.g. those with penetrating torso injuries), even if they are hypoperfusing. Although most clinicians still generally support fluid resuscitation for multisystem blunt trauma, particularly with head injury, the most recent experimental data have begun to challenge this traditional practice as well, suggesting a 'slow infusion' approach when there is risk for uncontrolled internal bleeding. By providing oxygen delivery with slow, limited infusion, new hemoglobin-based oxygen carriers might help to resolve the current dilemma of having to limit preoperative resuscitation when there is risk of uncontrolled hemorrhage.

AB - Current reviews and consensus documents now recommend a more discriminating approach to the traditional practices of delivering liberal infusions of intravenous fluid to all major trauma patients with suspected or known major hemorrhage. The evolving evidence suggests that aggressive fluid resuscitation prior to hemostasis leads to additional bleeding through hydraulic acceleration of hemorrhage, soft clot dissolution, and dilution of clotting factors. Aggressive preoperative fluid infusion is still considered appropriate for unconscious patients without palpable blood pressure or for those with controllable hemorrhage (e.g. isolated extremity or head injury), However, the latest recommendations are to limit or delay intravenous fluid resuscitation preoperatively in those with uncontrollable hemorrhage (e.g. those with penetrating torso injuries), even if they are hypoperfusing. Although most clinicians still generally support fluid resuscitation for multisystem blunt trauma, particularly with head injury, the most recent experimental data have begun to challenge this traditional practice as well, suggesting a 'slow infusion' approach when there is risk for uncontrolled internal bleeding. By providing oxygen delivery with slow, limited infusion, new hemoglobin-based oxygen carriers might help to resolve the current dilemma of having to limit preoperative resuscitation when there is risk of uncontrolled hemorrhage.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036110510&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036110510&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00001503-200204000-00006

DO - 10.1097/00001503-200204000-00006

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 173

EP - 178

JO - Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology

JF - Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology

SN - 0952-7907

IS - 2

ER -