Frequency, Indications, and Outcomes of Guide Catheter Extension Use in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Thao Duong, George Christopoulos, Michael Luna, George Christakopoulos, Ryan G. Master, Bavana V. Rangan, Michele Roesle, Subhash Banerjee, Emmanouil S. Brilakis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The frequency and outcomes of guide catheter extension use during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have received limited study. METHODS: We retrospectively examined 1539 consecutive PCIs performed between May 2010 and November 2013 to determine the frequency and outcomes of guide catheter extension utilization. RESULTS: During the study period, a guide catheter extension was used in 83 cases (5.4%; 95% confidence interval, 4.3%-6.6%) in 86 vessels. The PCI target vessel was the left anterior descending artery (11%), circumflex (23%), right coronary artery (50%), left main (1%), or a saphenous vein bypass graft (15%). The indications for use (non-mutually exclusive) were to facilitate equipment delivery or provide vessel support/ engagement (84.7%), thrombus aspiration (10.5%), retrieval of lost devices (2.3%), facilitation of reverse controlled antegrade and retrograde tracking and dissection (1%), and selective vessel visualization with contrast (1%). Guide catheter extension success rate was 73.3% and technical and procedural success rates were 91.6% and 90.4%, respectively. Four patients (4.8%) experienced a guide catheter extension-related complication: vessel dissection/injury in 2 cases (1 case required emergency coronary artery bypass graft surgery and 1 case required stenting) and equipment loss in 2 cases (1 detachment of the distal guide-extension marker and 1 shearing of a guidewire tip that embolized to the renal artery). CONCLUSIONS: In a contemporary patient population undergoing PCI, a guide catheter extension was used in approximately 1 of 20 PCIs. Guide catheter extensions can facilitate procedural success, but also carry low risk for device-related complications.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)E211-E215
JournalJournal of Invasive Cardiology
Volume27
Issue number10
StatePublished - Oct 1 2015

Fingerprint

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Catheters
Equipment and Supplies
Dissection
Transplants
Saphenous Vein
Renal Artery
Coronary Artery Bypass
Coronary Vessels
Emergencies
Thrombosis
Arteries
Confidence Intervals
Wounds and Injuries
Population

Keywords

  • balloon angioplasty
  • complications
  • guide catheter extension
  • percutaneous coronary intervention
  • techniques

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Frequency, Indications, and Outcomes of Guide Catheter Extension Use in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. / Duong, Thao; Christopoulos, George; Luna, Michael; Christakopoulos, George; Master, Ryan G.; Rangan, Bavana V.; Roesle, Michele; Banerjee, Subhash; Brilakis, Emmanouil S.

In: Journal of Invasive Cardiology, Vol. 27, No. 10, 01.10.2015, p. E211-E215.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Duong, Thao ; Christopoulos, George ; Luna, Michael ; Christakopoulos, George ; Master, Ryan G. ; Rangan, Bavana V. ; Roesle, Michele ; Banerjee, Subhash ; Brilakis, Emmanouil S. / Frequency, Indications, and Outcomes of Guide Catheter Extension Use in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. In: Journal of Invasive Cardiology. 2015 ; Vol. 27, No. 10. pp. E211-E215.
@article{4508283c149941d8b67efa9ec62fc809,
title = "Frequency, Indications, and Outcomes of Guide Catheter Extension Use in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: The frequency and outcomes of guide catheter extension use during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have received limited study. METHODS: We retrospectively examined 1539 consecutive PCIs performed between May 2010 and November 2013 to determine the frequency and outcomes of guide catheter extension utilization. RESULTS: During the study period, a guide catheter extension was used in 83 cases (5.4{\%}; 95{\%} confidence interval, 4.3{\%}-6.6{\%}) in 86 vessels. The PCI target vessel was the left anterior descending artery (11{\%}), circumflex (23{\%}), right coronary artery (50{\%}), left main (1{\%}), or a saphenous vein bypass graft (15{\%}). The indications for use (non-mutually exclusive) were to facilitate equipment delivery or provide vessel support/ engagement (84.7{\%}), thrombus aspiration (10.5{\%}), retrieval of lost devices (2.3{\%}), facilitation of reverse controlled antegrade and retrograde tracking and dissection (1{\%}), and selective vessel visualization with contrast (1{\%}). Guide catheter extension success rate was 73.3{\%} and technical and procedural success rates were 91.6{\%} and 90.4{\%}, respectively. Four patients (4.8{\%}) experienced a guide catheter extension-related complication: vessel dissection/injury in 2 cases (1 case required emergency coronary artery bypass graft surgery and 1 case required stenting) and equipment loss in 2 cases (1 detachment of the distal guide-extension marker and 1 shearing of a guidewire tip that embolized to the renal artery). CONCLUSIONS: In a contemporary patient population undergoing PCI, a guide catheter extension was used in approximately 1 of 20 PCIs. Guide catheter extensions can facilitate procedural success, but also carry low risk for device-related complications.",
keywords = "balloon angioplasty, complications, guide catheter extension, percutaneous coronary intervention, techniques",
author = "Thao Duong and George Christopoulos and Michael Luna and George Christakopoulos and Master, {Ryan G.} and Rangan, {Bavana V.} and Michele Roesle and Subhash Banerjee and Brilakis, {Emmanouil S.}",
year = "2015",
month = "10",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "E211--E215",
journal = "Journal of Invasive Cardiology",
issn = "1042-3931",
publisher = "HMP Communications",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Frequency, Indications, and Outcomes of Guide Catheter Extension Use in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

AU - Duong, Thao

AU - Christopoulos, George

AU - Luna, Michael

AU - Christakopoulos, George

AU - Master, Ryan G.

AU - Rangan, Bavana V.

AU - Roesle, Michele

AU - Banerjee, Subhash

AU - Brilakis, Emmanouil S.

PY - 2015/10/1

Y1 - 2015/10/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: The frequency and outcomes of guide catheter extension use during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have received limited study. METHODS: We retrospectively examined 1539 consecutive PCIs performed between May 2010 and November 2013 to determine the frequency and outcomes of guide catheter extension utilization. RESULTS: During the study period, a guide catheter extension was used in 83 cases (5.4%; 95% confidence interval, 4.3%-6.6%) in 86 vessels. The PCI target vessel was the left anterior descending artery (11%), circumflex (23%), right coronary artery (50%), left main (1%), or a saphenous vein bypass graft (15%). The indications for use (non-mutually exclusive) were to facilitate equipment delivery or provide vessel support/ engagement (84.7%), thrombus aspiration (10.5%), retrieval of lost devices (2.3%), facilitation of reverse controlled antegrade and retrograde tracking and dissection (1%), and selective vessel visualization with contrast (1%). Guide catheter extension success rate was 73.3% and technical and procedural success rates were 91.6% and 90.4%, respectively. Four patients (4.8%) experienced a guide catheter extension-related complication: vessel dissection/injury in 2 cases (1 case required emergency coronary artery bypass graft surgery and 1 case required stenting) and equipment loss in 2 cases (1 detachment of the distal guide-extension marker and 1 shearing of a guidewire tip that embolized to the renal artery). CONCLUSIONS: In a contemporary patient population undergoing PCI, a guide catheter extension was used in approximately 1 of 20 PCIs. Guide catheter extensions can facilitate procedural success, but also carry low risk for device-related complications.

AB - BACKGROUND: The frequency and outcomes of guide catheter extension use during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have received limited study. METHODS: We retrospectively examined 1539 consecutive PCIs performed between May 2010 and November 2013 to determine the frequency and outcomes of guide catheter extension utilization. RESULTS: During the study period, a guide catheter extension was used in 83 cases (5.4%; 95% confidence interval, 4.3%-6.6%) in 86 vessels. The PCI target vessel was the left anterior descending artery (11%), circumflex (23%), right coronary artery (50%), left main (1%), or a saphenous vein bypass graft (15%). The indications for use (non-mutually exclusive) were to facilitate equipment delivery or provide vessel support/ engagement (84.7%), thrombus aspiration (10.5%), retrieval of lost devices (2.3%), facilitation of reverse controlled antegrade and retrograde tracking and dissection (1%), and selective vessel visualization with contrast (1%). Guide catheter extension success rate was 73.3% and technical and procedural success rates were 91.6% and 90.4%, respectively. Four patients (4.8%) experienced a guide catheter extension-related complication: vessel dissection/injury in 2 cases (1 case required emergency coronary artery bypass graft surgery and 1 case required stenting) and equipment loss in 2 cases (1 detachment of the distal guide-extension marker and 1 shearing of a guidewire tip that embolized to the renal artery). CONCLUSIONS: In a contemporary patient population undergoing PCI, a guide catheter extension was used in approximately 1 of 20 PCIs. Guide catheter extensions can facilitate procedural success, but also carry low risk for device-related complications.

KW - balloon angioplasty

KW - complications

KW - guide catheter extension

KW - percutaneous coronary intervention

KW - techniques

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84942945595&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84942945595&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - E211-E215

JO - Journal of Invasive Cardiology

JF - Journal of Invasive Cardiology

SN - 1042-3931

IS - 10

ER -