Frequent ICD Shocks due to Double Sensing in Patients with Bi-Ventricular Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators

Amin Al-Ahmad, Paul J. Wang, Munther K. Homoud, N. A Mark Estes, Mark S. Link

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Biventricular pacing has emerged as a modality for treatment of patients with heart failure. Combined biventricular pacers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators offer treatment of heart failure as well as protection from sudden cardiac death. However, inappropriate ICD shocks as a result of double sensing due to widely spaced ventricular bipoles may pose a significant problem in these patients. We examined the ICD records of twenty-three patients with biventricular ICDs, and evaluated all episodes of double sensing that resulted in aborted or delivered therapy. In follow-up of 3.7 ± 2.6 months, thirty-three shocks in fifteen episodes occurred in five patients (21.7%) due to double sensing. Four patients (17.4%) had aborted shocks due to double sensing. All episodes resulting in shock occurred because of sinus tachycardia or supraventricular tachycardia above the upper programmed pacing rate of the device with resultant AV conduction and double sensing of the nonpaced ventricular depolarization. In conclusion, double sensing of the R-wave is a common and clinically important cause of inappropriate ICD detection and shock in patients with biventricular ICDs. Appropriate programming of the ICD can prevent episodes of inappropriate shocks.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)377-381
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology
Volume9
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2003

Fingerprint

Implantable Defibrillators
Shock
Heart Failure
Sinus Tachycardia
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
Supraventricular Tachycardia
Sudden Cardiac Death
Treatment Failure
Equipment and Supplies
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Biventricular pacing
  • Heart failure
  • Implantable cardioverter defibrillator

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Frequent ICD Shocks due to Double Sensing in Patients with Bi-Ventricular Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators. / Al-Ahmad, Amin; Wang, Paul J.; Homoud, Munther K.; Estes, N. A Mark; Link, Mark S.

In: Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, Vol. 9, No. 3, 01.12.2003, p. 377-381.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ad02f1e352ff46bba2c362fdf400fabf,
title = "Frequent ICD Shocks due to Double Sensing in Patients with Bi-Ventricular Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators",
abstract = "Biventricular pacing has emerged as a modality for treatment of patients with heart failure. Combined biventricular pacers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators offer treatment of heart failure as well as protection from sudden cardiac death. However, inappropriate ICD shocks as a result of double sensing due to widely spaced ventricular bipoles may pose a significant problem in these patients. We examined the ICD records of twenty-three patients with biventricular ICDs, and evaluated all episodes of double sensing that resulted in aborted or delivered therapy. In follow-up of 3.7 ± 2.6 months, thirty-three shocks in fifteen episodes occurred in five patients (21.7{\%}) due to double sensing. Four patients (17.4{\%}) had aborted shocks due to double sensing. All episodes resulting in shock occurred because of sinus tachycardia or supraventricular tachycardia above the upper programmed pacing rate of the device with resultant AV conduction and double sensing of the nonpaced ventricular depolarization. In conclusion, double sensing of the R-wave is a common and clinically important cause of inappropriate ICD detection and shock in patients with biventricular ICDs. Appropriate programming of the ICD can prevent episodes of inappropriate shocks.",
keywords = "Biventricular pacing, Heart failure, Implantable cardioverter defibrillator",
author = "Amin Al-Ahmad and Wang, {Paul J.} and Homoud, {Munther K.} and Estes, {N. A Mark} and Link, {Mark S.}",
year = "2003",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1023/A:1027455713120",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "377--381",
journal = "Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology",
issn = "1383-875X",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Frequent ICD Shocks due to Double Sensing in Patients with Bi-Ventricular Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators

AU - Al-Ahmad, Amin

AU - Wang, Paul J.

AU - Homoud, Munther K.

AU - Estes, N. A Mark

AU - Link, Mark S.

PY - 2003/12/1

Y1 - 2003/12/1

N2 - Biventricular pacing has emerged as a modality for treatment of patients with heart failure. Combined biventricular pacers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators offer treatment of heart failure as well as protection from sudden cardiac death. However, inappropriate ICD shocks as a result of double sensing due to widely spaced ventricular bipoles may pose a significant problem in these patients. We examined the ICD records of twenty-three patients with biventricular ICDs, and evaluated all episodes of double sensing that resulted in aborted or delivered therapy. In follow-up of 3.7 ± 2.6 months, thirty-three shocks in fifteen episodes occurred in five patients (21.7%) due to double sensing. Four patients (17.4%) had aborted shocks due to double sensing. All episodes resulting in shock occurred because of sinus tachycardia or supraventricular tachycardia above the upper programmed pacing rate of the device with resultant AV conduction and double sensing of the nonpaced ventricular depolarization. In conclusion, double sensing of the R-wave is a common and clinically important cause of inappropriate ICD detection and shock in patients with biventricular ICDs. Appropriate programming of the ICD can prevent episodes of inappropriate shocks.

AB - Biventricular pacing has emerged as a modality for treatment of patients with heart failure. Combined biventricular pacers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators offer treatment of heart failure as well as protection from sudden cardiac death. However, inappropriate ICD shocks as a result of double sensing due to widely spaced ventricular bipoles may pose a significant problem in these patients. We examined the ICD records of twenty-three patients with biventricular ICDs, and evaluated all episodes of double sensing that resulted in aborted or delivered therapy. In follow-up of 3.7 ± 2.6 months, thirty-three shocks in fifteen episodes occurred in five patients (21.7%) due to double sensing. Four patients (17.4%) had aborted shocks due to double sensing. All episodes resulting in shock occurred because of sinus tachycardia or supraventricular tachycardia above the upper programmed pacing rate of the device with resultant AV conduction and double sensing of the nonpaced ventricular depolarization. In conclusion, double sensing of the R-wave is a common and clinically important cause of inappropriate ICD detection and shock in patients with biventricular ICDs. Appropriate programming of the ICD can prevent episodes of inappropriate shocks.

KW - Biventricular pacing

KW - Heart failure

KW - Implantable cardioverter defibrillator

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0348112460&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0348112460&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1023/A:1027455713120

DO - 10.1023/A:1027455713120

M3 - Article

C2 - 14618060

AN - SCOPUS:0348112460

VL - 9

SP - 377

EP - 381

JO - Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology

JF - Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology

SN - 1383-875X

IS - 3

ER -