Gait pattern alteration by functional sensory substitution in healthy subjects and in diabetic subjects with peripheral neuropathy

Steven C. Walker, Phala A. Helm, Lawrence A. Lavery

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the ability of diabetic and nondiabetic individuals to learn to use a lower extremity sensory substitution device to cue gait pattern changes. Design: Case-control study. Setting: Gait laboratory. Participants: Thirty diabetic persons and 20 age- and education- matched nondiabetic controls responded to advertisements for study participation. Intervention: Participants walked on a treadmill at three speeds (1, 2, and 2.5mph) with auditory sensory feedback to cue ground contact greater than 80% duration of baseline. Main Outcome Measurements: The variables measured included gait cycle (steps per minute) and number of times per minute that any step during a trial exceeded 80% duration of ground contacted compared with a measured baseline step length for each speed. Results: Persons in both groups were able to rapidly and significantly alter their gait patterns in response to signals from the sensory substitution device, by changing their gait cycles (nondiabetic group, F(17,124) = 5.27, p < .001; diabetic group, F(5,172) = 3.45, p < .001). Post hoc analyses showed early gait cycle modification and error reduction among both groups. The nondiabetic group learned to use the device significantly more quickly than the diabetic group during the slow (1mph, t = 3.57, p < .001) and average (2mph, t = 2.97, p < .05) trials. By the fast (2.5mph) ambulation trial, both groups were performing equally, suggesting a rapid rate of adjustment to the device. No technical failures from gait trainer malfunction occurred during the study. Conclusions: Diabetic persons with neuropathy effectively used lower extremity sensory substitution, and the technology is now available to manufacture a durable, effective lower extremity sensory substitution system.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)853-856
Number of pages4
JournalArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume78
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1997

Fingerprint

Peripheral Nervous System Diseases
Gait
Healthy Volunteers
Lower Extremity
Equipment and Supplies
Cues
Social Adjustment
Sensory Feedback
Aptitude
Walking
Case-Control Studies
Technology
Education

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

@article{acd72405eb134cc588b0630ce9a864a6,
title = "Gait pattern alteration by functional sensory substitution in healthy subjects and in diabetic subjects with peripheral neuropathy",
abstract = "Objective: To evaluate the ability of diabetic and nondiabetic individuals to learn to use a lower extremity sensory substitution device to cue gait pattern changes. Design: Case-control study. Setting: Gait laboratory. Participants: Thirty diabetic persons and 20 age- and education- matched nondiabetic controls responded to advertisements for study participation. Intervention: Participants walked on a treadmill at three speeds (1, 2, and 2.5mph) with auditory sensory feedback to cue ground contact greater than 80{\%} duration of baseline. Main Outcome Measurements: The variables measured included gait cycle (steps per minute) and number of times per minute that any step during a trial exceeded 80{\%} duration of ground contacted compared with a measured baseline step length for each speed. Results: Persons in both groups were able to rapidly and significantly alter their gait patterns in response to signals from the sensory substitution device, by changing their gait cycles (nondiabetic group, F(17,124) = 5.27, p < .001; diabetic group, F(5,172) = 3.45, p < .001). Post hoc analyses showed early gait cycle modification and error reduction among both groups. The nondiabetic group learned to use the device significantly more quickly than the diabetic group during the slow (1mph, t = 3.57, p < .001) and average (2mph, t = 2.97, p < .05) trials. By the fast (2.5mph) ambulation trial, both groups were performing equally, suggesting a rapid rate of adjustment to the device. No technical failures from gait trainer malfunction occurred during the study. Conclusions: Diabetic persons with neuropathy effectively used lower extremity sensory substitution, and the technology is now available to manufacture a durable, effective lower extremity sensory substitution system.",
author = "Walker, {Steven C.} and Helm, {Phala A.} and Lavery, {Lawrence A.}",
year = "1997",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1016/S0003-9993(97)90199-4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "78",
pages = "853--856",
journal = "Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation",
issn = "0003-9993",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Gait pattern alteration by functional sensory substitution in healthy subjects and in diabetic subjects with peripheral neuropathy

AU - Walker, Steven C.

AU - Helm, Phala A.

AU - Lavery, Lawrence A.

PY - 1997/8

Y1 - 1997/8

N2 - Objective: To evaluate the ability of diabetic and nondiabetic individuals to learn to use a lower extremity sensory substitution device to cue gait pattern changes. Design: Case-control study. Setting: Gait laboratory. Participants: Thirty diabetic persons and 20 age- and education- matched nondiabetic controls responded to advertisements for study participation. Intervention: Participants walked on a treadmill at three speeds (1, 2, and 2.5mph) with auditory sensory feedback to cue ground contact greater than 80% duration of baseline. Main Outcome Measurements: The variables measured included gait cycle (steps per minute) and number of times per minute that any step during a trial exceeded 80% duration of ground contacted compared with a measured baseline step length for each speed. Results: Persons in both groups were able to rapidly and significantly alter their gait patterns in response to signals from the sensory substitution device, by changing their gait cycles (nondiabetic group, F(17,124) = 5.27, p < .001; diabetic group, F(5,172) = 3.45, p < .001). Post hoc analyses showed early gait cycle modification and error reduction among both groups. The nondiabetic group learned to use the device significantly more quickly than the diabetic group during the slow (1mph, t = 3.57, p < .001) and average (2mph, t = 2.97, p < .05) trials. By the fast (2.5mph) ambulation trial, both groups were performing equally, suggesting a rapid rate of adjustment to the device. No technical failures from gait trainer malfunction occurred during the study. Conclusions: Diabetic persons with neuropathy effectively used lower extremity sensory substitution, and the technology is now available to manufacture a durable, effective lower extremity sensory substitution system.

AB - Objective: To evaluate the ability of diabetic and nondiabetic individuals to learn to use a lower extremity sensory substitution device to cue gait pattern changes. Design: Case-control study. Setting: Gait laboratory. Participants: Thirty diabetic persons and 20 age- and education- matched nondiabetic controls responded to advertisements for study participation. Intervention: Participants walked on a treadmill at three speeds (1, 2, and 2.5mph) with auditory sensory feedback to cue ground contact greater than 80% duration of baseline. Main Outcome Measurements: The variables measured included gait cycle (steps per minute) and number of times per minute that any step during a trial exceeded 80% duration of ground contacted compared with a measured baseline step length for each speed. Results: Persons in both groups were able to rapidly and significantly alter their gait patterns in response to signals from the sensory substitution device, by changing their gait cycles (nondiabetic group, F(17,124) = 5.27, p < .001; diabetic group, F(5,172) = 3.45, p < .001). Post hoc analyses showed early gait cycle modification and error reduction among both groups. The nondiabetic group learned to use the device significantly more quickly than the diabetic group during the slow (1mph, t = 3.57, p < .001) and average (2mph, t = 2.97, p < .05) trials. By the fast (2.5mph) ambulation trial, both groups were performing equally, suggesting a rapid rate of adjustment to the device. No technical failures from gait trainer malfunction occurred during the study. Conclusions: Diabetic persons with neuropathy effectively used lower extremity sensory substitution, and the technology is now available to manufacture a durable, effective lower extremity sensory substitution system.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030805278&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030805278&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0003-9993(97)90199-4

DO - 10.1016/S0003-9993(97)90199-4

M3 - Article

C2 - 9344305

AN - SCOPUS:0030805278

VL - 78

SP - 853

EP - 856

JO - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

JF - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

SN - 0003-9993

IS - 8

ER -