Gastric mucosal atrophy: Interobserver consistency using new criteria for classification and grading

M. Rugge, P. Correa, M. F. Dixon, R. Fiocca, T. Hattori, J. Lechago, G. Leandro, A. B. Price, P. Sipponen, E. Solcia, H. Watanabe, R. M. Genta

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

235 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and aims: Considerable difficulties persist amongst pathologists in agreeing on the presence and severity of gastric atrophy. An international group of pathologists pursued the following aims: (i) to generate an acceptable definition and a simple reproducible classification of gastric atrophy; and (ii) to develop guidelines for the recognition of atrophy useful for increasing agreement among observers. Methods: After redefining atrophy as the 'loss of appropriate glands' and examining histological samples from different gastric compartments, three categories were identified: (i) negative; (ii) indefinite; (iii) atrophy, with and without intestinalization. Atrophy was graded on a three-level scale. Interobserver reproducibility of the classification was tested by κ statistics (general and weighted) in a series of 48 cases. Results: The medians of the general agreement and weighted κ values were 0.78 and 0.73, respectively. The weighted κ coefficients, obtained by cross-tabulating the evaluation of each pathologist against all others, were, with only one exception, > 0.4 (moderate to excellent agreement). Conclusions: By using the definition of atrophy as the loss of appropriate glands and distinguishing the two main morphological entities of metaplastic and non-metaplastic types, a high level of agreement was achieved by a group of gastrointestinal pathologists trained in different cultural contexts.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1249-1259
Number of pages11
JournalAlimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics
Volume16
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - 2002

Fingerprint

Atrophy
Stomach
Guidelines
Pathologists

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pharmacology (medical)
  • Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics(all)

Cite this

Gastric mucosal atrophy : Interobserver consistency using new criteria for classification and grading. / Rugge, M.; Correa, P.; Dixon, M. F.; Fiocca, R.; Hattori, T.; Lechago, J.; Leandro, G.; Price, A. B.; Sipponen, P.; Solcia, E.; Watanabe, H.; Genta, R. M.

In: Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Vol. 16, No. 7, 2002, p. 1249-1259.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rugge, M, Correa, P, Dixon, MF, Fiocca, R, Hattori, T, Lechago, J, Leandro, G, Price, AB, Sipponen, P, Solcia, E, Watanabe, H & Genta, RM 2002, 'Gastric mucosal atrophy: Interobserver consistency using new criteria for classification and grading', Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics, vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 1249-1259. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2036.2002.01301.x
Rugge, M. ; Correa, P. ; Dixon, M. F. ; Fiocca, R. ; Hattori, T. ; Lechago, J. ; Leandro, G. ; Price, A. B. ; Sipponen, P. ; Solcia, E. ; Watanabe, H. ; Genta, R. M. / Gastric mucosal atrophy : Interobserver consistency using new criteria for classification and grading. In: Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 2002 ; Vol. 16, No. 7. pp. 1249-1259.
@article{ae2dec193ca94767a46e2e5f9026d250,
title = "Gastric mucosal atrophy: Interobserver consistency using new criteria for classification and grading",
abstract = "Background and aims: Considerable difficulties persist amongst pathologists in agreeing on the presence and severity of gastric atrophy. An international group of pathologists pursued the following aims: (i) to generate an acceptable definition and a simple reproducible classification of gastric atrophy; and (ii) to develop guidelines for the recognition of atrophy useful for increasing agreement among observers. Methods: After redefining atrophy as the 'loss of appropriate glands' and examining histological samples from different gastric compartments, three categories were identified: (i) negative; (ii) indefinite; (iii) atrophy, with and without intestinalization. Atrophy was graded on a three-level scale. Interobserver reproducibility of the classification was tested by κ statistics (general and weighted) in a series of 48 cases. Results: The medians of the general agreement and weighted κ values were 0.78 and 0.73, respectively. The weighted κ coefficients, obtained by cross-tabulating the evaluation of each pathologist against all others, were, with only one exception, > 0.4 (moderate to excellent agreement). Conclusions: By using the definition of atrophy as the loss of appropriate glands and distinguishing the two main morphological entities of metaplastic and non-metaplastic types, a high level of agreement was achieved by a group of gastrointestinal pathologists trained in different cultural contexts.",
author = "M. Rugge and P. Correa and Dixon, {M. F.} and R. Fiocca and T. Hattori and J. Lechago and G. Leandro and Price, {A. B.} and P. Sipponen and E. Solcia and H. Watanabe and Genta, {R. M.}",
year = "2002",
doi = "10.1046/j.1365-2036.2002.01301.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "1249--1259",
journal = "Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics",
issn = "0269-2813",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Gastric mucosal atrophy

T2 - Interobserver consistency using new criteria for classification and grading

AU - Rugge, M.

AU - Correa, P.

AU - Dixon, M. F.

AU - Fiocca, R.

AU - Hattori, T.

AU - Lechago, J.

AU - Leandro, G.

AU - Price, A. B.

AU - Sipponen, P.

AU - Solcia, E.

AU - Watanabe, H.

AU - Genta, R. M.

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - Background and aims: Considerable difficulties persist amongst pathologists in agreeing on the presence and severity of gastric atrophy. An international group of pathologists pursued the following aims: (i) to generate an acceptable definition and a simple reproducible classification of gastric atrophy; and (ii) to develop guidelines for the recognition of atrophy useful for increasing agreement among observers. Methods: After redefining atrophy as the 'loss of appropriate glands' and examining histological samples from different gastric compartments, three categories were identified: (i) negative; (ii) indefinite; (iii) atrophy, with and without intestinalization. Atrophy was graded on a three-level scale. Interobserver reproducibility of the classification was tested by κ statistics (general and weighted) in a series of 48 cases. Results: The medians of the general agreement and weighted κ values were 0.78 and 0.73, respectively. The weighted κ coefficients, obtained by cross-tabulating the evaluation of each pathologist against all others, were, with only one exception, > 0.4 (moderate to excellent agreement). Conclusions: By using the definition of atrophy as the loss of appropriate glands and distinguishing the two main morphological entities of metaplastic and non-metaplastic types, a high level of agreement was achieved by a group of gastrointestinal pathologists trained in different cultural contexts.

AB - Background and aims: Considerable difficulties persist amongst pathologists in agreeing on the presence and severity of gastric atrophy. An international group of pathologists pursued the following aims: (i) to generate an acceptable definition and a simple reproducible classification of gastric atrophy; and (ii) to develop guidelines for the recognition of atrophy useful for increasing agreement among observers. Methods: After redefining atrophy as the 'loss of appropriate glands' and examining histological samples from different gastric compartments, three categories were identified: (i) negative; (ii) indefinite; (iii) atrophy, with and without intestinalization. Atrophy was graded on a three-level scale. Interobserver reproducibility of the classification was tested by κ statistics (general and weighted) in a series of 48 cases. Results: The medians of the general agreement and weighted κ values were 0.78 and 0.73, respectively. The weighted κ coefficients, obtained by cross-tabulating the evaluation of each pathologist against all others, were, with only one exception, > 0.4 (moderate to excellent agreement). Conclusions: By using the definition of atrophy as the loss of appropriate glands and distinguishing the two main morphological entities of metaplastic and non-metaplastic types, a high level of agreement was achieved by a group of gastrointestinal pathologists trained in different cultural contexts.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036024197&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036024197&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2002.01301.x

DO - 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2002.01301.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 12144574

AN - SCOPUS:0036024197

VL - 16

SP - 1249

EP - 1259

JO - Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics

JF - Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics

SN - 0269-2813

IS - 7

ER -