Generalized equivalent field size for nonuniform fluence maps in IMRT dose calculation

Mingli Chen, Weiguo Lu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: The equivalent field size (EFS) method is widely used to estimate dose of nonstandard fields, such as elongated or arbitrary shaped fields, for both central axis and off axis points. However, its application is limited to fluence maps with uniform intensity. In this work, we propose a generalized EFS (GEFS) for nonuniform fluence maps and present a formula for GEFS-based dose calculation. Methods: A parallel-beam dose table (PDT) consisting of central axis dose of circular fields of various diameters at various depths is used to define scatter contributions, based on which we calculate GEFS of any given fluence map. Such obtained GEFS, together with the radiological depth and PDT, is used to determine the dose at the point of interest. We tested GEFS-based dose calculation on a water phantom for both uniform and nonuniform fluence maps and compared the results with those by the collapsed cone convolution/ superposition (CCCS) method. Results: For all test cases, the gamma index is less than 1 based on the 3%/1 mm criteria for more than 96% of the calculated points. Larger discrepancies mainly occur along the field edges in the buildup region. Conclusions: A generalized equivalent field size for nonuniform fluence maps was proposed and its application in calculating dose at any point was presented and verified through comparison with the CCCS method.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)449-454
Number of pages6
JournalMedical physics
Volume38
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2011

Keywords

  • IMRT
  • generalized equivalent field size
  • nonuniform fluence
  • point dose calculation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Generalized equivalent field size for nonuniform fluence maps in IMRT dose calculation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this