Gunshot Wound Injuries of the Prostate and Posterior Urethra: Reconstructive Armamentarium

Timothy J. Tausch, Andre G. Cavalcanti, Douglas W. Soderdahl, Luciano Favorito, Paulo Rabelo, Allen F. Morey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Descriptions of posterior urethral penetrating injuries are rare in the literature and their management is poorly described. We reviewed the medical records of 19 men who sustained posterior urethral gunshot wounds and report our experience with various treatment options. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 19 men (mean age 27 years) who sustained posterior urethral gunshot wound injuries confirmed by retrograde urethrography and/or exploratory laparotomy. Treatment options included immediate primary repair in 2 patients, delayed reconstruction in 15 and complete prostatectomy in 2. Outcomes were described by flow rates and lower urinary tract symptoms. Results: Of 15 patients who underwent delayed repair 13 (86.6%) demonstrated normal flow rates and lack of lower urinary tract symptoms. The 2 remaining patients experienced obliterative stricture recurrences and were treated with open surgery. Both patients who underwent immediate primary repair had normal flow rates. Of the 2 men who underwent immediate prostatectomy 1 had moderate incontinence requiring absorbent pad use and the other was lost to followup after he was discharged home with a suprapubic catheter in place. Conclusions: An initial management strategy based on the principles of maximizing urinary catheter drainage, with direct retropubic repair/urethral realignment when possible and definitive perineal reconstruction when necessary, appears to provide acceptable outcomes while minimizing the number of subsequent interventions required.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1346-1348
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of Urology
Volume178
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2007

Fingerprint

Gunshot Wounds
Urethra
Prostate
Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms
Wounds and Injuries
Prostatectomy
Absorbent Pads
Urinary Catheters
Laparotomy
Medical Records
Drainage
Pathologic Constriction
Catheters
Recurrence
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • penetrating
  • prostate
  • urethra
  • wounds

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Gunshot Wound Injuries of the Prostate and Posterior Urethra : Reconstructive Armamentarium. / Tausch, Timothy J.; Cavalcanti, Andre G.; Soderdahl, Douglas W.; Favorito, Luciano; Rabelo, Paulo; Morey, Allen F.

In: Journal of Urology, Vol. 178, No. 4, 10.2007, p. 1346-1348.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tausch, TJ, Cavalcanti, AG, Soderdahl, DW, Favorito, L, Rabelo, P & Morey, AF 2007, 'Gunshot Wound Injuries of the Prostate and Posterior Urethra: Reconstructive Armamentarium', Journal of Urology, vol. 178, no. 4, pp. 1346-1348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2007.05.141
Tausch, Timothy J. ; Cavalcanti, Andre G. ; Soderdahl, Douglas W. ; Favorito, Luciano ; Rabelo, Paulo ; Morey, Allen F. / Gunshot Wound Injuries of the Prostate and Posterior Urethra : Reconstructive Armamentarium. In: Journal of Urology. 2007 ; Vol. 178, No. 4. pp. 1346-1348.
@article{f1deb50a043b476aa999daaa3d4fff09,
title = "Gunshot Wound Injuries of the Prostate and Posterior Urethra: Reconstructive Armamentarium",
abstract = "Purpose: Descriptions of posterior urethral penetrating injuries are rare in the literature and their management is poorly described. We reviewed the medical records of 19 men who sustained posterior urethral gunshot wounds and report our experience with various treatment options. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 19 men (mean age 27 years) who sustained posterior urethral gunshot wound injuries confirmed by retrograde urethrography and/or exploratory laparotomy. Treatment options included immediate primary repair in 2 patients, delayed reconstruction in 15 and complete prostatectomy in 2. Outcomes were described by flow rates and lower urinary tract symptoms. Results: Of 15 patients who underwent delayed repair 13 (86.6{\%}) demonstrated normal flow rates and lack of lower urinary tract symptoms. The 2 remaining patients experienced obliterative stricture recurrences and were treated with open surgery. Both patients who underwent immediate primary repair had normal flow rates. Of the 2 men who underwent immediate prostatectomy 1 had moderate incontinence requiring absorbent pad use and the other was lost to followup after he was discharged home with a suprapubic catheter in place. Conclusions: An initial management strategy based on the principles of maximizing urinary catheter drainage, with direct retropubic repair/urethral realignment when possible and definitive perineal reconstruction when necessary, appears to provide acceptable outcomes while minimizing the number of subsequent interventions required.",
keywords = "penetrating, prostate, urethra, wounds",
author = "Tausch, {Timothy J.} and Cavalcanti, {Andre G.} and Soderdahl, {Douglas W.} and Luciano Favorito and Paulo Rabelo and Morey, {Allen F.}",
year = "2007",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1016/j.juro.2007.05.141",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "178",
pages = "1346--1348",
journal = "Journal of Urology",
issn = "0022-5347",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Gunshot Wound Injuries of the Prostate and Posterior Urethra

T2 - Reconstructive Armamentarium

AU - Tausch, Timothy J.

AU - Cavalcanti, Andre G.

AU - Soderdahl, Douglas W.

AU - Favorito, Luciano

AU - Rabelo, Paulo

AU - Morey, Allen F.

PY - 2007/10

Y1 - 2007/10

N2 - Purpose: Descriptions of posterior urethral penetrating injuries are rare in the literature and their management is poorly described. We reviewed the medical records of 19 men who sustained posterior urethral gunshot wounds and report our experience with various treatment options. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 19 men (mean age 27 years) who sustained posterior urethral gunshot wound injuries confirmed by retrograde urethrography and/or exploratory laparotomy. Treatment options included immediate primary repair in 2 patients, delayed reconstruction in 15 and complete prostatectomy in 2. Outcomes were described by flow rates and lower urinary tract symptoms. Results: Of 15 patients who underwent delayed repair 13 (86.6%) demonstrated normal flow rates and lack of lower urinary tract symptoms. The 2 remaining patients experienced obliterative stricture recurrences and were treated with open surgery. Both patients who underwent immediate primary repair had normal flow rates. Of the 2 men who underwent immediate prostatectomy 1 had moderate incontinence requiring absorbent pad use and the other was lost to followup after he was discharged home with a suprapubic catheter in place. Conclusions: An initial management strategy based on the principles of maximizing urinary catheter drainage, with direct retropubic repair/urethral realignment when possible and definitive perineal reconstruction when necessary, appears to provide acceptable outcomes while minimizing the number of subsequent interventions required.

AB - Purpose: Descriptions of posterior urethral penetrating injuries are rare in the literature and their management is poorly described. We reviewed the medical records of 19 men who sustained posterior urethral gunshot wounds and report our experience with various treatment options. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 19 men (mean age 27 years) who sustained posterior urethral gunshot wound injuries confirmed by retrograde urethrography and/or exploratory laparotomy. Treatment options included immediate primary repair in 2 patients, delayed reconstruction in 15 and complete prostatectomy in 2. Outcomes were described by flow rates and lower urinary tract symptoms. Results: Of 15 patients who underwent delayed repair 13 (86.6%) demonstrated normal flow rates and lack of lower urinary tract symptoms. The 2 remaining patients experienced obliterative stricture recurrences and were treated with open surgery. Both patients who underwent immediate primary repair had normal flow rates. Of the 2 men who underwent immediate prostatectomy 1 had moderate incontinence requiring absorbent pad use and the other was lost to followup after he was discharged home with a suprapubic catheter in place. Conclusions: An initial management strategy based on the principles of maximizing urinary catheter drainage, with direct retropubic repair/urethral realignment when possible and definitive perineal reconstruction when necessary, appears to provide acceptable outcomes while minimizing the number of subsequent interventions required.

KW - penetrating

KW - prostate

KW - urethra

KW - wounds

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34548502697&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34548502697&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.juro.2007.05.141

DO - 10.1016/j.juro.2007.05.141

M3 - Article

C2 - 17706720

AN - SCOPUS:34548502697

VL - 178

SP - 1346

EP - 1348

JO - Journal of Urology

JF - Journal of Urology

SN - 0022-5347

IS - 4

ER -