Health insurance and cardiac transplantation: A call for reform

Louise P. King, Laura A. Siminoff, Dan M. Meyer, Clyde W. Yancy, W. Steves Ring, Thomas W. Mayo, Mark H. Drazner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Cardiac transplantation is an accepted therapy for patients with end-stage heart failure (ESHF). Presently in the U.S., patients with ESHF need to have health insurance or another funding source to be considered eligible for cardiac transplantation. Whether it is appropriate to exclude potential recipients solely due to lack of finances has received considerable interest including being the subject of a recent major motion picture (John Q, New Line Cinema, 2002). However, one important aspect of this debate has been underappreciated and insufficiently addressed. Specifically, organ donation does not require the donor to have health insurance. Thus, individuals donate their hearts although they themselves would not have been eligible to receive a transplant had they needed one. By querying Siminoff's National Study of Family Consent to Organ Donation database, we find that this situation is not uncommon as ∼23% of organ donors are uninsured. Herein we also discuss how the funding requirement for cardiac transplantation has been addressed by the federal government in the past, its implications on the organ donor consent process, and its potential impact on organ donation rates. We call for a government-sponsored, multidisciplinary task force to address this situation in hopes of remedying the inequities in the present system of organ allocation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1388-1391
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of the American College of Cardiology
Volume45
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - May 3 2005

Fingerprint

Tissue and Organ Procurement
Heart Transplantation
Health Insurance
Tissue Donors
Motion Pictures
Heart Failure
Federal Government
Advisory Committees
Databases
Transplants
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

Health insurance and cardiac transplantation : A call for reform. / King, Louise P.; Siminoff, Laura A.; Meyer, Dan M.; Yancy, Clyde W.; Ring, W. Steves; Mayo, Thomas W.; Drazner, Mark H.

In: Journal of the American College of Cardiology, Vol. 45, No. 9, 03.05.2005, p. 1388-1391.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

King, Louise P. ; Siminoff, Laura A. ; Meyer, Dan M. ; Yancy, Clyde W. ; Ring, W. Steves ; Mayo, Thomas W. ; Drazner, Mark H. / Health insurance and cardiac transplantation : A call for reform. In: Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2005 ; Vol. 45, No. 9. pp. 1388-1391.
@article{dcda483d57064f42804d7c5209a66385,
title = "Health insurance and cardiac transplantation: A call for reform",
abstract = "Cardiac transplantation is an accepted therapy for patients with end-stage heart failure (ESHF). Presently in the U.S., patients with ESHF need to have health insurance or another funding source to be considered eligible for cardiac transplantation. Whether it is appropriate to exclude potential recipients solely due to lack of finances has received considerable interest including being the subject of a recent major motion picture (John Q, New Line Cinema, 2002). However, one important aspect of this debate has been underappreciated and insufficiently addressed. Specifically, organ donation does not require the donor to have health insurance. Thus, individuals donate their hearts although they themselves would not have been eligible to receive a transplant had they needed one. By querying Siminoff's National Study of Family Consent to Organ Donation database, we find that this situation is not uncommon as ∼23{\%} of organ donors are uninsured. Herein we also discuss how the funding requirement for cardiac transplantation has been addressed by the federal government in the past, its implications on the organ donor consent process, and its potential impact on organ donation rates. We call for a government-sponsored, multidisciplinary task force to address this situation in hopes of remedying the inequities in the present system of organ allocation.",
author = "King, {Louise P.} and Siminoff, {Laura A.} and Meyer, {Dan M.} and Yancy, {Clyde W.} and Ring, {W. Steves} and Mayo, {Thomas W.} and Drazner, {Mark H.}",
year = "2005",
month = "5",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.jacc.2005.01.032",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "45",
pages = "1388--1391",
journal = "Journal of the American College of Cardiology",
issn = "0735-1097",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Health insurance and cardiac transplantation

T2 - A call for reform

AU - King, Louise P.

AU - Siminoff, Laura A.

AU - Meyer, Dan M.

AU - Yancy, Clyde W.

AU - Ring, W. Steves

AU - Mayo, Thomas W.

AU - Drazner, Mark H.

PY - 2005/5/3

Y1 - 2005/5/3

N2 - Cardiac transplantation is an accepted therapy for patients with end-stage heart failure (ESHF). Presently in the U.S., patients with ESHF need to have health insurance or another funding source to be considered eligible for cardiac transplantation. Whether it is appropriate to exclude potential recipients solely due to lack of finances has received considerable interest including being the subject of a recent major motion picture (John Q, New Line Cinema, 2002). However, one important aspect of this debate has been underappreciated and insufficiently addressed. Specifically, organ donation does not require the donor to have health insurance. Thus, individuals donate their hearts although they themselves would not have been eligible to receive a transplant had they needed one. By querying Siminoff's National Study of Family Consent to Organ Donation database, we find that this situation is not uncommon as ∼23% of organ donors are uninsured. Herein we also discuss how the funding requirement for cardiac transplantation has been addressed by the federal government in the past, its implications on the organ donor consent process, and its potential impact on organ donation rates. We call for a government-sponsored, multidisciplinary task force to address this situation in hopes of remedying the inequities in the present system of organ allocation.

AB - Cardiac transplantation is an accepted therapy for patients with end-stage heart failure (ESHF). Presently in the U.S., patients with ESHF need to have health insurance or another funding source to be considered eligible for cardiac transplantation. Whether it is appropriate to exclude potential recipients solely due to lack of finances has received considerable interest including being the subject of a recent major motion picture (John Q, New Line Cinema, 2002). However, one important aspect of this debate has been underappreciated and insufficiently addressed. Specifically, organ donation does not require the donor to have health insurance. Thus, individuals donate their hearts although they themselves would not have been eligible to receive a transplant had they needed one. By querying Siminoff's National Study of Family Consent to Organ Donation database, we find that this situation is not uncommon as ∼23% of organ donors are uninsured. Herein we also discuss how the funding requirement for cardiac transplantation has been addressed by the federal government in the past, its implications on the organ donor consent process, and its potential impact on organ donation rates. We call for a government-sponsored, multidisciplinary task force to address this situation in hopes of remedying the inequities in the present system of organ allocation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=18144376354&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=18144376354&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.01.032

DO - 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.01.032

M3 - Article

C2 - 15862407

AN - SCOPUS:18144376354

VL - 45

SP - 1388

EP - 1391

JO - Journal of the American College of Cardiology

JF - Journal of the American College of Cardiology

SN - 0735-1097

IS - 9

ER -