Heterogeneity and Variability in Pressure Autoregulation of Organ Blood Flow: Lessons Learned Over 100+ Years

Lingzhong Meng, Yingwei Wang, Lina Zhang, David L McDonagh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Pressure autoregulation is an organ's intrinsic ability to maintain blood flow despite changes in perfusion pressure. The purpose of this review is to discuss autoregulation's heterogeneity among different organs and variability under different conditions, a very clinically relevant topic. DATA SOURCES: Systematic search of Ovid MEDLINE; nonsystematic search of PubMed, Google Scholar, and reference lists. STUDY SELECTION: Animal or human studies investigating the potency or variation of pressure autoregulation of any organs or the association between autoregulation and outcomes. DATA EXTRACTION: Two authors screened the identified studies independently then collectively agreed upon articles to be used as the basis for this review. DATA SYNTHESIS: Study details, including subjects, organ investigated, methods of blood pressure intervention and blood flow measurement, and values of the lower limit, upper limit, and plateau were examined. Comparative canine studies were used to demonstrate the heterogeneity of pressure autoregulation among different organs and validate the proposed scale for organ categorization by autoregulatory capacity. Autoregulatory variability is discussed per organ. The association between cerebral autoregulation and outcome is summarized. CONCLUSIONS: The organs with robust autoregulation are the brain, spinal cord, heart, and kidney. Skeletal muscle has moderate autoregulation. Nearly all splanchnic organs including the stomach, small intestine, colon, liver, and pancreas possess weak autoregulation. Autoregulation can be readily affected by a variety of clinically relevant factors. Organs with weak or weakened autoregulation are at a greater risk of suboptimal perfusion when blood pressure fluctuates. Cerebral autoregulation and outcomes are closely related. These lessons learned over 100+ years are instructive in clinical care.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)436-448
Number of pages13
JournalCritical care medicine
Volume47
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2019

Fingerprint

Homeostasis
Pressure
Perfusion
Blood Pressure
Viscera
PubMed
MEDLINE
Small Intestine
Canidae
Pancreas
Spinal Cord
Stomach
Colon
Skeletal Muscle
Kidney
Liver
Brain

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Heterogeneity and Variability in Pressure Autoregulation of Organ Blood Flow : Lessons Learned Over 100+ Years. / Meng, Lingzhong; Wang, Yingwei; Zhang, Lina; McDonagh, David L.

In: Critical care medicine, Vol. 47, No. 3, 01.03.2019, p. 436-448.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d162f6f65159470ab3a8a4c0551712a2,
title = "Heterogeneity and Variability in Pressure Autoregulation of Organ Blood Flow: Lessons Learned Over 100+ Years",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: Pressure autoregulation is an organ's intrinsic ability to maintain blood flow despite changes in perfusion pressure. The purpose of this review is to discuss autoregulation's heterogeneity among different organs and variability under different conditions, a very clinically relevant topic. DATA SOURCES: Systematic search of Ovid MEDLINE; nonsystematic search of PubMed, Google Scholar, and reference lists. STUDY SELECTION: Animal or human studies investigating the potency or variation of pressure autoregulation of any organs or the association between autoregulation and outcomes. DATA EXTRACTION: Two authors screened the identified studies independently then collectively agreed upon articles to be used as the basis for this review. DATA SYNTHESIS: Study details, including subjects, organ investigated, methods of blood pressure intervention and blood flow measurement, and values of the lower limit, upper limit, and plateau were examined. Comparative canine studies were used to demonstrate the heterogeneity of pressure autoregulation among different organs and validate the proposed scale for organ categorization by autoregulatory capacity. Autoregulatory variability is discussed per organ. The association between cerebral autoregulation and outcome is summarized. CONCLUSIONS: The organs with robust autoregulation are the brain, spinal cord, heart, and kidney. Skeletal muscle has moderate autoregulation. Nearly all splanchnic organs including the stomach, small intestine, colon, liver, and pancreas possess weak autoregulation. Autoregulation can be readily affected by a variety of clinically relevant factors. Organs with weak or weakened autoregulation are at a greater risk of suboptimal perfusion when blood pressure fluctuates. Cerebral autoregulation and outcomes are closely related. These lessons learned over 100+ years are instructive in clinical care.",
author = "Lingzhong Meng and Yingwei Wang and Lina Zhang and McDonagh, {David L}",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/CCM.0000000000003569",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "47",
pages = "436--448",
journal = "Critical Care Medicine",
issn = "0090-3493",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Heterogeneity and Variability in Pressure Autoregulation of Organ Blood Flow

T2 - Lessons Learned Over 100+ Years

AU - Meng, Lingzhong

AU - Wang, Yingwei

AU - Zhang, Lina

AU - McDonagh, David L

PY - 2019/3/1

Y1 - 2019/3/1

N2 - OBJECTIVES: Pressure autoregulation is an organ's intrinsic ability to maintain blood flow despite changes in perfusion pressure. The purpose of this review is to discuss autoregulation's heterogeneity among different organs and variability under different conditions, a very clinically relevant topic. DATA SOURCES: Systematic search of Ovid MEDLINE; nonsystematic search of PubMed, Google Scholar, and reference lists. STUDY SELECTION: Animal or human studies investigating the potency or variation of pressure autoregulation of any organs or the association between autoregulation and outcomes. DATA EXTRACTION: Two authors screened the identified studies independently then collectively agreed upon articles to be used as the basis for this review. DATA SYNTHESIS: Study details, including subjects, organ investigated, methods of blood pressure intervention and blood flow measurement, and values of the lower limit, upper limit, and plateau were examined. Comparative canine studies were used to demonstrate the heterogeneity of pressure autoregulation among different organs and validate the proposed scale for organ categorization by autoregulatory capacity. Autoregulatory variability is discussed per organ. The association between cerebral autoregulation and outcome is summarized. CONCLUSIONS: The organs with robust autoregulation are the brain, spinal cord, heart, and kidney. Skeletal muscle has moderate autoregulation. Nearly all splanchnic organs including the stomach, small intestine, colon, liver, and pancreas possess weak autoregulation. Autoregulation can be readily affected by a variety of clinically relevant factors. Organs with weak or weakened autoregulation are at a greater risk of suboptimal perfusion when blood pressure fluctuates. Cerebral autoregulation and outcomes are closely related. These lessons learned over 100+ years are instructive in clinical care.

AB - OBJECTIVES: Pressure autoregulation is an organ's intrinsic ability to maintain blood flow despite changes in perfusion pressure. The purpose of this review is to discuss autoregulation's heterogeneity among different organs and variability under different conditions, a very clinically relevant topic. DATA SOURCES: Systematic search of Ovid MEDLINE; nonsystematic search of PubMed, Google Scholar, and reference lists. STUDY SELECTION: Animal or human studies investigating the potency or variation of pressure autoregulation of any organs or the association between autoregulation and outcomes. DATA EXTRACTION: Two authors screened the identified studies independently then collectively agreed upon articles to be used as the basis for this review. DATA SYNTHESIS: Study details, including subjects, organ investigated, methods of blood pressure intervention and blood flow measurement, and values of the lower limit, upper limit, and plateau were examined. Comparative canine studies were used to demonstrate the heterogeneity of pressure autoregulation among different organs and validate the proposed scale for organ categorization by autoregulatory capacity. Autoregulatory variability is discussed per organ. The association between cerebral autoregulation and outcome is summarized. CONCLUSIONS: The organs with robust autoregulation are the brain, spinal cord, heart, and kidney. Skeletal muscle has moderate autoregulation. Nearly all splanchnic organs including the stomach, small intestine, colon, liver, and pancreas possess weak autoregulation. Autoregulation can be readily affected by a variety of clinically relevant factors. Organs with weak or weakened autoregulation are at a greater risk of suboptimal perfusion when blood pressure fluctuates. Cerebral autoregulation and outcomes are closely related. These lessons learned over 100+ years are instructive in clinical care.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061569367&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85061569367&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003569

DO - 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003569

M3 - Article

C2 - 30516567

AN - SCOPUS:85061569367

VL - 47

SP - 436

EP - 448

JO - Critical Care Medicine

JF - Critical Care Medicine

SN - 0090-3493

IS - 3

ER -