High-signal foci on MR images of the brain: Observer variability in their quantification

F. Z. Yetkin, V. M. Haughton, M. E. Fischer, R. A. Papke, D. L. Daniels, L. P. Mark, L. E. Hendrix, R. J. Asleson, J. Johansen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Foci of high signal in the cerebral white matter are common incidental findings on MR images of the brain of control subjects or patients with a variety of diseases. Although the number of foci has been reported to correlate with age and several risk factors, the degree of observer variability in quantifying foci has not been reported. We used kappa statistics to determine radiologists' agreement in counting high-signal- intensity foci on MR images obtained in healthy volunteers and in patients with hypertension. Before interpreting the images, one pair of radiologists studied 30 routine MR images and reached consensus on differentiating high- signal foci from other foci of high intensity caused by normal structures (e.g., deep gyri or Virchow-Robin spaces). These two observers then independently determined the number of foci in the study group. Using their own criteria, other radiologists independently counted the foci. Agreement between observers was determined with the kappa statistic. The results showed fair agreement between the radiologists who first reached a consensus in counting foci of hyperintensity and poor agreement between the other observers. We conclude that in order to compare the frequency of foci of hyperintensity in different groups of patients, observer variability must be controlled. Studies without proper control subjects may lead to incorrect conclusions regarding the correlation of focal hyperintensities and various risk factors.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)185-188
Number of pages4
JournalAmerican Journal of Roentgenology
Volume159
Issue number1
StatePublished - 1992

Fingerprint

Brain
Songbirds
Incidental Findings
Healthy Volunteers
Hypertension
Radiologists
White Matter

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Yetkin, F. Z., Haughton, V. M., Fischer, M. E., Papke, R. A., Daniels, D. L., Mark, L. P., ... Johansen, J. (1992). High-signal foci on MR images of the brain: Observer variability in their quantification. American Journal of Roentgenology, 159(1), 185-188.

High-signal foci on MR images of the brain : Observer variability in their quantification. / Yetkin, F. Z.; Haughton, V. M.; Fischer, M. E.; Papke, R. A.; Daniels, D. L.; Mark, L. P.; Hendrix, L. E.; Asleson, R. J.; Johansen, J.

In: American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol. 159, No. 1, 1992, p. 185-188.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Yetkin, FZ, Haughton, VM, Fischer, ME, Papke, RA, Daniels, DL, Mark, LP, Hendrix, LE, Asleson, RJ & Johansen, J 1992, 'High-signal foci on MR images of the brain: Observer variability in their quantification', American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 159, no. 1, pp. 185-188.
Yetkin FZ, Haughton VM, Fischer ME, Papke RA, Daniels DL, Mark LP et al. High-signal foci on MR images of the brain: Observer variability in their quantification. American Journal of Roentgenology. 1992;159(1):185-188.
Yetkin, F. Z. ; Haughton, V. M. ; Fischer, M. E. ; Papke, R. A. ; Daniels, D. L. ; Mark, L. P. ; Hendrix, L. E. ; Asleson, R. J. ; Johansen, J. / High-signal foci on MR images of the brain : Observer variability in their quantification. In: American Journal of Roentgenology. 1992 ; Vol. 159, No. 1. pp. 185-188.
@article{5e1e19b4cd224c1da07ead17c65becc1,
title = "High-signal foci on MR images of the brain: Observer variability in their quantification",
abstract = "Foci of high signal in the cerebral white matter are common incidental findings on MR images of the brain of control subjects or patients with a variety of diseases. Although the number of foci has been reported to correlate with age and several risk factors, the degree of observer variability in quantifying foci has not been reported. We used kappa statistics to determine radiologists' agreement in counting high-signal- intensity foci on MR images obtained in healthy volunteers and in patients with hypertension. Before interpreting the images, one pair of radiologists studied 30 routine MR images and reached consensus on differentiating high- signal foci from other foci of high intensity caused by normal structures (e.g., deep gyri or Virchow-Robin spaces). These two observers then independently determined the number of foci in the study group. Using their own criteria, other radiologists independently counted the foci. Agreement between observers was determined with the kappa statistic. The results showed fair agreement between the radiologists who first reached a consensus in counting foci of hyperintensity and poor agreement between the other observers. We conclude that in order to compare the frequency of foci of hyperintensity in different groups of patients, observer variability must be controlled. Studies without proper control subjects may lead to incorrect conclusions regarding the correlation of focal hyperintensities and various risk factors.",
author = "Yetkin, {F. Z.} and Haughton, {V. M.} and Fischer, {M. E.} and Papke, {R. A.} and Daniels, {D. L.} and Mark, {L. P.} and Hendrix, {L. E.} and Asleson, {R. J.} and J. Johansen",
year = "1992",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "159",
pages = "185--188",
journal = "American Journal of Roentgenology",
issn = "0361-803X",
publisher = "American Roentgen Ray Society",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - High-signal foci on MR images of the brain

T2 - Observer variability in their quantification

AU - Yetkin, F. Z.

AU - Haughton, V. M.

AU - Fischer, M. E.

AU - Papke, R. A.

AU - Daniels, D. L.

AU - Mark, L. P.

AU - Hendrix, L. E.

AU - Asleson, R. J.

AU - Johansen, J.

PY - 1992

Y1 - 1992

N2 - Foci of high signal in the cerebral white matter are common incidental findings on MR images of the brain of control subjects or patients with a variety of diseases. Although the number of foci has been reported to correlate with age and several risk factors, the degree of observer variability in quantifying foci has not been reported. We used kappa statistics to determine radiologists' agreement in counting high-signal- intensity foci on MR images obtained in healthy volunteers and in patients with hypertension. Before interpreting the images, one pair of radiologists studied 30 routine MR images and reached consensus on differentiating high- signal foci from other foci of high intensity caused by normal structures (e.g., deep gyri or Virchow-Robin spaces). These two observers then independently determined the number of foci in the study group. Using their own criteria, other radiologists independently counted the foci. Agreement between observers was determined with the kappa statistic. The results showed fair agreement between the radiologists who first reached a consensus in counting foci of hyperintensity and poor agreement between the other observers. We conclude that in order to compare the frequency of foci of hyperintensity in different groups of patients, observer variability must be controlled. Studies without proper control subjects may lead to incorrect conclusions regarding the correlation of focal hyperintensities and various risk factors.

AB - Foci of high signal in the cerebral white matter are common incidental findings on MR images of the brain of control subjects or patients with a variety of diseases. Although the number of foci has been reported to correlate with age and several risk factors, the degree of observer variability in quantifying foci has not been reported. We used kappa statistics to determine radiologists' agreement in counting high-signal- intensity foci on MR images obtained in healthy volunteers and in patients with hypertension. Before interpreting the images, one pair of radiologists studied 30 routine MR images and reached consensus on differentiating high- signal foci from other foci of high intensity caused by normal structures (e.g., deep gyri or Virchow-Robin spaces). These two observers then independently determined the number of foci in the study group. Using their own criteria, other radiologists independently counted the foci. Agreement between observers was determined with the kappa statistic. The results showed fair agreement between the radiologists who first reached a consensus in counting foci of hyperintensity and poor agreement between the other observers. We conclude that in order to compare the frequency of foci of hyperintensity in different groups of patients, observer variability must be controlled. Studies without proper control subjects may lead to incorrect conclusions regarding the correlation of focal hyperintensities and various risk factors.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026717770&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026717770&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 1609695

AN - SCOPUS:0026717770

VL - 159

SP - 185

EP - 188

JO - American Journal of Roentgenology

JF - American Journal of Roentgenology

SN - 0361-803X

IS - 1

ER -