Hits: A short domestic violence screening tool for use in a family practice setting

Kevin M. Sherin, James M. Sinacore, Xiao Qiang Li, Robert E. Zitter, Amer Shakil

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

262 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Domestic violence is an important problem that is often not recognized by physicians. We designed a short instrument for domestic violence screening that could be easily remembered and administered by family physicians. Methods: In phase one of the study, 160 adult female family practice office patients living with a partner for at least 12 months completed two questionnaires. One questionnaire was the verbal and physical aggression items of the Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS). The other was a new four-item questionnaire that asked respondents how often their partner physically Hurt, Insulted, Threatened with harm, and Screamed at them. These four items make the acronym HITS. In phase two, 99 women, who were self-identified victims of domestic violence, completed the HITS. Results: For phase one, Cronbach's alpha was .80 for the HITS scale. The correlation of HITS and CTS scores was .85. For phase two, the mean HITS scores for office patients and abuse victims were 6.13 and 15.15, respectively. Optimal data analysis revealed that a cut score of 10.5 on the HITS reliably differentiated respondents in the two groups. Using this cut score, 91% of patients and 96% of abuse victims were accurately classified. Conclusions: The HITS scale showed good internal consistency and concurrent validity with the CTS verbal and physical aggression items. The HITS scale also showed good construct validity in its ability to differentiate family practice patients from abuse victims. The HITS scale is promising as a domestic violence screening mnemonic for family practice physicians and residents.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)508-512
Number of pages5
JournalFamily Medicine
Volume30
Issue number7
StatePublished - Jul 1998

Fingerprint

Domestic Violence
Family Practice
Family Physicians
Aggression
Aptitude
Surveys and Questionnaires
Physicians
Conflict (Psychology)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Sherin, K. M., Sinacore, J. M., Li, X. Q., Zitter, R. E., & Shakil, A. (1998). Hits: A short domestic violence screening tool for use in a family practice setting. Family Medicine, 30(7), 508-512.

Hits : A short domestic violence screening tool for use in a family practice setting. / Sherin, Kevin M.; Sinacore, James M.; Li, Xiao Qiang; Zitter, Robert E.; Shakil, Amer.

In: Family Medicine, Vol. 30, No. 7, 07.1998, p. 508-512.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sherin, KM, Sinacore, JM, Li, XQ, Zitter, RE & Shakil, A 1998, 'Hits: A short domestic violence screening tool for use in a family practice setting', Family Medicine, vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 508-512.
Sherin, Kevin M. ; Sinacore, James M. ; Li, Xiao Qiang ; Zitter, Robert E. ; Shakil, Amer. / Hits : A short domestic violence screening tool for use in a family practice setting. In: Family Medicine. 1998 ; Vol. 30, No. 7. pp. 508-512.
@article{2bbba818fc2f4f52b709ca614faa8e85,
title = "Hits: A short domestic violence screening tool for use in a family practice setting",
abstract = "Background and Objectives: Domestic violence is an important problem that is often not recognized by physicians. We designed a short instrument for domestic violence screening that could be easily remembered and administered by family physicians. Methods: In phase one of the study, 160 adult female family practice office patients living with a partner for at least 12 months completed two questionnaires. One questionnaire was the verbal and physical aggression items of the Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS). The other was a new four-item questionnaire that asked respondents how often their partner physically Hurt, Insulted, Threatened with harm, and Screamed at them. These four items make the acronym HITS. In phase two, 99 women, who were self-identified victims of domestic violence, completed the HITS. Results: For phase one, Cronbach's alpha was .80 for the HITS scale. The correlation of HITS and CTS scores was .85. For phase two, the mean HITS scores for office patients and abuse victims were 6.13 and 15.15, respectively. Optimal data analysis revealed that a cut score of 10.5 on the HITS reliably differentiated respondents in the two groups. Using this cut score, 91{\%} of patients and 96{\%} of abuse victims were accurately classified. Conclusions: The HITS scale showed good internal consistency and concurrent validity with the CTS verbal and physical aggression items. The HITS scale also showed good construct validity in its ability to differentiate family practice patients from abuse victims. The HITS scale is promising as a domestic violence screening mnemonic for family practice physicians and residents.",
author = "Sherin, {Kevin M.} and Sinacore, {James M.} and Li, {Xiao Qiang} and Zitter, {Robert E.} and Amer Shakil",
year = "1998",
month = "7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "508--512",
journal = "Family Medicine",
issn = "0742-3225",
publisher = "Society of Teachers of Family Medicine",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Hits

T2 - A short domestic violence screening tool for use in a family practice setting

AU - Sherin, Kevin M.

AU - Sinacore, James M.

AU - Li, Xiao Qiang

AU - Zitter, Robert E.

AU - Shakil, Amer

PY - 1998/7

Y1 - 1998/7

N2 - Background and Objectives: Domestic violence is an important problem that is often not recognized by physicians. We designed a short instrument for domestic violence screening that could be easily remembered and administered by family physicians. Methods: In phase one of the study, 160 adult female family practice office patients living with a partner for at least 12 months completed two questionnaires. One questionnaire was the verbal and physical aggression items of the Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS). The other was a new four-item questionnaire that asked respondents how often their partner physically Hurt, Insulted, Threatened with harm, and Screamed at them. These four items make the acronym HITS. In phase two, 99 women, who were self-identified victims of domestic violence, completed the HITS. Results: For phase one, Cronbach's alpha was .80 for the HITS scale. The correlation of HITS and CTS scores was .85. For phase two, the mean HITS scores for office patients and abuse victims were 6.13 and 15.15, respectively. Optimal data analysis revealed that a cut score of 10.5 on the HITS reliably differentiated respondents in the two groups. Using this cut score, 91% of patients and 96% of abuse victims were accurately classified. Conclusions: The HITS scale showed good internal consistency and concurrent validity with the CTS verbal and physical aggression items. The HITS scale also showed good construct validity in its ability to differentiate family practice patients from abuse victims. The HITS scale is promising as a domestic violence screening mnemonic for family practice physicians and residents.

AB - Background and Objectives: Domestic violence is an important problem that is often not recognized by physicians. We designed a short instrument for domestic violence screening that could be easily remembered and administered by family physicians. Methods: In phase one of the study, 160 adult female family practice office patients living with a partner for at least 12 months completed two questionnaires. One questionnaire was the verbal and physical aggression items of the Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS). The other was a new four-item questionnaire that asked respondents how often their partner physically Hurt, Insulted, Threatened with harm, and Screamed at them. These four items make the acronym HITS. In phase two, 99 women, who were self-identified victims of domestic violence, completed the HITS. Results: For phase one, Cronbach's alpha was .80 for the HITS scale. The correlation of HITS and CTS scores was .85. For phase two, the mean HITS scores for office patients and abuse victims were 6.13 and 15.15, respectively. Optimal data analysis revealed that a cut score of 10.5 on the HITS reliably differentiated respondents in the two groups. Using this cut score, 91% of patients and 96% of abuse victims were accurately classified. Conclusions: The HITS scale showed good internal consistency and concurrent validity with the CTS verbal and physical aggression items. The HITS scale also showed good construct validity in its ability to differentiate family practice patients from abuse victims. The HITS scale is promising as a domestic violence screening mnemonic for family practice physicians and residents.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031825964&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031825964&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 9669164

AN - SCOPUS:0031825964

VL - 30

SP - 508

EP - 512

JO - Family Medicine

JF - Family Medicine

SN - 0742-3225

IS - 7

ER -