Horsefeathers: A commentary on 'evolutionary versus prototype analyses of the concept of disorder'

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

J.C. Wakefield's (1999) article further develops his harmful dysfunction (HD) model for disorder concepts. This commentary focuses on three areas. The first notes the imbalance in the debate between the Lilienfeld and Marino (1995) Roschian model and the HD model for disorder concepts. The second claims that Wakefield's purposes for the HD model have changed over the years and progressed toward irrelevance to psychopathology in general and toward irrelevance to actual nosologic, reimbursement, and sociopolitical controversies about disorder status. Further discussion is on how certain structural elements in Wakefield's arguments and current limitations of evolutionary theory permit a superficially attractive model for psychopathology. These arguments and limitations, however, harbor serious problems when confronted with actual disputes about disorders. The conclusion notes some virtues to Wakefield's inquiry, in style and substance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)433-437
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Abnormal Psychology
Volume108
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1999

Fingerprint

Psychopathology
Dissent and Disputes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Horsefeathers : A commentary on 'evolutionary versus prototype analyses of the concept of disorder'. / Sadler, John Z.

In: Journal of Abnormal Psychology, Vol. 108, No. 3, 08.1999, p. 433-437.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{fefb44b096734f8880be7dfffe634275,
title = "Horsefeathers: A commentary on 'evolutionary versus prototype analyses of the concept of disorder'",
abstract = "J.C. Wakefield's (1999) article further develops his harmful dysfunction (HD) model for disorder concepts. This commentary focuses on three areas. The first notes the imbalance in the debate between the Lilienfeld and Marino (1995) Roschian model and the HD model for disorder concepts. The second claims that Wakefield's purposes for the HD model have changed over the years and progressed toward irrelevance to psychopathology in general and toward irrelevance to actual nosologic, reimbursement, and sociopolitical controversies about disorder status. Further discussion is on how certain structural elements in Wakefield's arguments and current limitations of evolutionary theory permit a superficially attractive model for psychopathology. These arguments and limitations, however, harbor serious problems when confronted with actual disputes about disorders. The conclusion notes some virtues to Wakefield's inquiry, in style and substance.",
author = "Sadler, {John Z.}",
year = "1999",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1037/0021-843X.108.3.433",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "108",
pages = "433--437",
journal = "Journal of Abnormal Psychology",
issn = "0021-843X",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Horsefeathers

T2 - A commentary on 'evolutionary versus prototype analyses of the concept of disorder'

AU - Sadler, John Z.

PY - 1999/8

Y1 - 1999/8

N2 - J.C. Wakefield's (1999) article further develops his harmful dysfunction (HD) model for disorder concepts. This commentary focuses on three areas. The first notes the imbalance in the debate between the Lilienfeld and Marino (1995) Roschian model and the HD model for disorder concepts. The second claims that Wakefield's purposes for the HD model have changed over the years and progressed toward irrelevance to psychopathology in general and toward irrelevance to actual nosologic, reimbursement, and sociopolitical controversies about disorder status. Further discussion is on how certain structural elements in Wakefield's arguments and current limitations of evolutionary theory permit a superficially attractive model for psychopathology. These arguments and limitations, however, harbor serious problems when confronted with actual disputes about disorders. The conclusion notes some virtues to Wakefield's inquiry, in style and substance.

AB - J.C. Wakefield's (1999) article further develops his harmful dysfunction (HD) model for disorder concepts. This commentary focuses on three areas. The first notes the imbalance in the debate between the Lilienfeld and Marino (1995) Roschian model and the HD model for disorder concepts. The second claims that Wakefield's purposes for the HD model have changed over the years and progressed toward irrelevance to psychopathology in general and toward irrelevance to actual nosologic, reimbursement, and sociopolitical controversies about disorder status. Further discussion is on how certain structural elements in Wakefield's arguments and current limitations of evolutionary theory permit a superficially attractive model for psychopathology. These arguments and limitations, however, harbor serious problems when confronted with actual disputes about disorders. The conclusion notes some virtues to Wakefield's inquiry, in style and substance.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032774119&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032774119&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0021-843X.108.3.433

DO - 10.1037/0021-843X.108.3.433

M3 - Article

C2 - 10466266

AN - SCOPUS:0032774119

VL - 108

SP - 433

EP - 437

JO - Journal of Abnormal Psychology

JF - Journal of Abnormal Psychology

SN - 0021-843X

IS - 3

ER -