How Do Emergency Medicine Residency Programs Structure Their Clinical Competency Committees? A Survey

Christopher I. Doty, Lynn P. Roppolo, Shellie Asher, Jason P. Seamon, Rahul Bhat, Stephanie Taft, Autumn Graham, James Willis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) recently has mandated the formation of a clinical competency committee (CCC) to evaluate residents across the newly defined milestone continuum. The ACGME has been nonproscriptive of how these CCCs are to be structured in order to provide flexibility to the programs. Objectives No best practices for the formation of CCCs currently exist. We seek to determine common structures of CCCs recently formed in the Council of Emergency Medicine Residency Directors (CORD) member programs and identify unique structures that have been developed. Methods In this descriptive study, an 18-question survey was distributed via the CORD listserv in the late fall of 2013. Each member program was asked questions about the structure of its CCC. These responses were analyzed with simple descriptive statistics. Results A total of 116 of the 160 programs responded, giving a 73% response rate. Of responders, most (71.6%) CCCs are chaired by the associate or assistant program director, while a small number (14.7%) are chaired by a core faculty member. Program directors (PDs) chair 12.1% of CCCs. Most CCCs are attended by the PD (85.3%) and selected core faculty members (78.5%), leaving the remaining committees attended by any core faculty. Voting members of the CCC consist of the residency leadership either with the PD (53.9%) or without the PD (36.5%) as a voting member. CCCs have an average attendance of 7.4 members with a range of three to 15 members. Of respondents, 53.1% of CCCs meet quarterly while 37% meet monthly. The majority of programs (76.4%) report a system to match residents with a faculty mentor or advisor. Of respondents, 36% include the resident's faculty mentor or advisor to discuss a particular resident. Milestone summaries (determination of level for each milestone) are the primary focus of discussion (93.8%), utilizing multiple sources of information. Conclusions The substantial variability and diversity found in our CORD survey of CCC structure and function suggest that there are myriad strategies that residency programs can use to match individual program needs and resources to requirements of the ACGME. Identifying a single protocol for CCC structure and development may prove challenging.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1351-1354
Number of pages4
JournalAcademic Emergency Medicine
Volume22
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2015

Fingerprint

Clinical Competence
Emergency Medicine
Internship and Residency
Graduate Medical Education
Accreditation
Mentors
Politics
Practice Guidelines
Surveys and Questionnaires

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

How Do Emergency Medicine Residency Programs Structure Their Clinical Competency Committees? A Survey. / Doty, Christopher I.; Roppolo, Lynn P.; Asher, Shellie; Seamon, Jason P.; Bhat, Rahul; Taft, Stephanie; Graham, Autumn; Willis, James.

In: Academic Emergency Medicine, Vol. 22, No. 11, 01.11.2015, p. 1351-1354.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Doty, Christopher I. ; Roppolo, Lynn P. ; Asher, Shellie ; Seamon, Jason P. ; Bhat, Rahul ; Taft, Stephanie ; Graham, Autumn ; Willis, James. / How Do Emergency Medicine Residency Programs Structure Their Clinical Competency Committees? A Survey. In: Academic Emergency Medicine. 2015 ; Vol. 22, No. 11. pp. 1351-1354.
@article{9ba4c3e2537844a6a489569d1b21596c,
title = "How Do Emergency Medicine Residency Programs Structure Their Clinical Competency Committees? A Survey",
abstract = "Background The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) recently has mandated the formation of a clinical competency committee (CCC) to evaluate residents across the newly defined milestone continuum. The ACGME has been nonproscriptive of how these CCCs are to be structured in order to provide flexibility to the programs. Objectives No best practices for the formation of CCCs currently exist. We seek to determine common structures of CCCs recently formed in the Council of Emergency Medicine Residency Directors (CORD) member programs and identify unique structures that have been developed. Methods In this descriptive study, an 18-question survey was distributed via the CORD listserv in the late fall of 2013. Each member program was asked questions about the structure of its CCC. These responses were analyzed with simple descriptive statistics. Results A total of 116 of the 160 programs responded, giving a 73{\%} response rate. Of responders, most (71.6{\%}) CCCs are chaired by the associate or assistant program director, while a small number (14.7{\%}) are chaired by a core faculty member. Program directors (PDs) chair 12.1{\%} of CCCs. Most CCCs are attended by the PD (85.3{\%}) and selected core faculty members (78.5{\%}), leaving the remaining committees attended by any core faculty. Voting members of the CCC consist of the residency leadership either with the PD (53.9{\%}) or without the PD (36.5{\%}) as a voting member. CCCs have an average attendance of 7.4 members with a range of three to 15 members. Of respondents, 53.1{\%} of CCCs meet quarterly while 37{\%} meet monthly. The majority of programs (76.4{\%}) report a system to match residents with a faculty mentor or advisor. Of respondents, 36{\%} include the resident's faculty mentor or advisor to discuss a particular resident. Milestone summaries (determination of level for each milestone) are the primary focus of discussion (93.8{\%}), utilizing multiple sources of information. Conclusions The substantial variability and diversity found in our CORD survey of CCC structure and function suggest that there are myriad strategies that residency programs can use to match individual program needs and resources to requirements of the ACGME. Identifying a single protocol for CCC structure and development may prove challenging.",
author = "Doty, {Christopher I.} and Roppolo, {Lynn P.} and Shellie Asher and Seamon, {Jason P.} and Rahul Bhat and Stephanie Taft and Autumn Graham and James Willis",
year = "2015",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/acem.12804",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "1351--1354",
journal = "Academic Emergency Medicine",
issn = "1069-6563",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How Do Emergency Medicine Residency Programs Structure Their Clinical Competency Committees? A Survey

AU - Doty, Christopher I.

AU - Roppolo, Lynn P.

AU - Asher, Shellie

AU - Seamon, Jason P.

AU - Bhat, Rahul

AU - Taft, Stephanie

AU - Graham, Autumn

AU - Willis, James

PY - 2015/11/1

Y1 - 2015/11/1

N2 - Background The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) recently has mandated the formation of a clinical competency committee (CCC) to evaluate residents across the newly defined milestone continuum. The ACGME has been nonproscriptive of how these CCCs are to be structured in order to provide flexibility to the programs. Objectives No best practices for the formation of CCCs currently exist. We seek to determine common structures of CCCs recently formed in the Council of Emergency Medicine Residency Directors (CORD) member programs and identify unique structures that have been developed. Methods In this descriptive study, an 18-question survey was distributed via the CORD listserv in the late fall of 2013. Each member program was asked questions about the structure of its CCC. These responses were analyzed with simple descriptive statistics. Results A total of 116 of the 160 programs responded, giving a 73% response rate. Of responders, most (71.6%) CCCs are chaired by the associate or assistant program director, while a small number (14.7%) are chaired by a core faculty member. Program directors (PDs) chair 12.1% of CCCs. Most CCCs are attended by the PD (85.3%) and selected core faculty members (78.5%), leaving the remaining committees attended by any core faculty. Voting members of the CCC consist of the residency leadership either with the PD (53.9%) or without the PD (36.5%) as a voting member. CCCs have an average attendance of 7.4 members with a range of three to 15 members. Of respondents, 53.1% of CCCs meet quarterly while 37% meet monthly. The majority of programs (76.4%) report a system to match residents with a faculty mentor or advisor. Of respondents, 36% include the resident's faculty mentor or advisor to discuss a particular resident. Milestone summaries (determination of level for each milestone) are the primary focus of discussion (93.8%), utilizing multiple sources of information. Conclusions The substantial variability and diversity found in our CORD survey of CCC structure and function suggest that there are myriad strategies that residency programs can use to match individual program needs and resources to requirements of the ACGME. Identifying a single protocol for CCC structure and development may prove challenging.

AB - Background The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) recently has mandated the formation of a clinical competency committee (CCC) to evaluate residents across the newly defined milestone continuum. The ACGME has been nonproscriptive of how these CCCs are to be structured in order to provide flexibility to the programs. Objectives No best practices for the formation of CCCs currently exist. We seek to determine common structures of CCCs recently formed in the Council of Emergency Medicine Residency Directors (CORD) member programs and identify unique structures that have been developed. Methods In this descriptive study, an 18-question survey was distributed via the CORD listserv in the late fall of 2013. Each member program was asked questions about the structure of its CCC. These responses were analyzed with simple descriptive statistics. Results A total of 116 of the 160 programs responded, giving a 73% response rate. Of responders, most (71.6%) CCCs are chaired by the associate or assistant program director, while a small number (14.7%) are chaired by a core faculty member. Program directors (PDs) chair 12.1% of CCCs. Most CCCs are attended by the PD (85.3%) and selected core faculty members (78.5%), leaving the remaining committees attended by any core faculty. Voting members of the CCC consist of the residency leadership either with the PD (53.9%) or without the PD (36.5%) as a voting member. CCCs have an average attendance of 7.4 members with a range of three to 15 members. Of respondents, 53.1% of CCCs meet quarterly while 37% meet monthly. The majority of programs (76.4%) report a system to match residents with a faculty mentor or advisor. Of respondents, 36% include the resident's faculty mentor or advisor to discuss a particular resident. Milestone summaries (determination of level for each milestone) are the primary focus of discussion (93.8%), utilizing multiple sources of information. Conclusions The substantial variability and diversity found in our CORD survey of CCC structure and function suggest that there are myriad strategies that residency programs can use to match individual program needs and resources to requirements of the ACGME. Identifying a single protocol for CCC structure and development may prove challenging.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84946555518&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84946555518&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/acem.12804

DO - 10.1111/acem.12804

M3 - Article

C2 - 26473693

AN - SCOPUS:84946555518

VL - 22

SP - 1351

EP - 1354

JO - Academic Emergency Medicine

JF - Academic Emergency Medicine

SN - 1069-6563

IS - 11

ER -