How effective is tailored print communication?

Celette Sugg Skinner, Marci K. Campbell, Barbara K. Rimer, Susan Curry, James O. Prochaska

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

327 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article reviews the 'first generation' of tailored print communications studies in the published literature, describing the purpose, theoretical framework, sample, research design, message type and source, outcomes measured, and findings of each. Eight studies compared tailored versus similar nontailored print; one compared tailored print versus an alternate intervention, and three included tailored print as one of several intervention components. Although studies varied by behavioral topic, type of tailoring, and measurement of behavioral outcomes, several themes persist. Compared to their nontailored counterparts, tailored print communications have been consistently better remembered, read, and perceived as relevant and/or credible. There is also evidence that tailored print communications are more effective for influencing health behaviors. Six of the eight tailored/nontailored comparisons found more behavior change among tailored than nontailored recipients. Tailored print communications have also demonstrated effectiveness as an adjunct to other intervention components such as self-help smoking cessation manuals. However, studies comparing tailored print communications with tailoring via other media such as telephone counseling have shown mixed results. Additional research is needed to assess whether the behavioral topic itself may make a difference in whether tailoring is appropriate and effective.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)290-298
Number of pages9
JournalAnnals of Behavioral Medicine
Volume21
Issue number4
StatePublished - 1999

Fingerprint

Communication
Health Behavior
Smoking Cessation
Telephone
Counseling
Research Design
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Skinner, C. S., Campbell, M. K., Rimer, B. K., Curry, S., & Prochaska, J. O. (1999). How effective is tailored print communication? Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 21(4), 290-298.

How effective is tailored print communication? / Skinner, Celette Sugg; Campbell, Marci K.; Rimer, Barbara K.; Curry, Susan; Prochaska, James O.

In: Annals of Behavioral Medicine, Vol. 21, No. 4, 1999, p. 290-298.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Skinner, CS, Campbell, MK, Rimer, BK, Curry, S & Prochaska, JO 1999, 'How effective is tailored print communication?', Annals of Behavioral Medicine, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 290-298.
Skinner CS, Campbell MK, Rimer BK, Curry S, Prochaska JO. How effective is tailored print communication? Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 1999;21(4):290-298.
Skinner, Celette Sugg ; Campbell, Marci K. ; Rimer, Barbara K. ; Curry, Susan ; Prochaska, James O. / How effective is tailored print communication?. In: Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 1999 ; Vol. 21, No. 4. pp. 290-298.
@article{005666017279499fb5dd9d1ee630c826,
title = "How effective is tailored print communication?",
abstract = "This article reviews the 'first generation' of tailored print communications studies in the published literature, describing the purpose, theoretical framework, sample, research design, message type and source, outcomes measured, and findings of each. Eight studies compared tailored versus similar nontailored print; one compared tailored print versus an alternate intervention, and three included tailored print as one of several intervention components. Although studies varied by behavioral topic, type of tailoring, and measurement of behavioral outcomes, several themes persist. Compared to their nontailored counterparts, tailored print communications have been consistently better remembered, read, and perceived as relevant and/or credible. There is also evidence that tailored print communications are more effective for influencing health behaviors. Six of the eight tailored/nontailored comparisons found more behavior change among tailored than nontailored recipients. Tailored print communications have also demonstrated effectiveness as an adjunct to other intervention components such as self-help smoking cessation manuals. However, studies comparing tailored print communications with tailoring via other media such as telephone counseling have shown mixed results. Additional research is needed to assess whether the behavioral topic itself may make a difference in whether tailoring is appropriate and effective.",
author = "Skinner, {Celette Sugg} and Campbell, {Marci K.} and Rimer, {Barbara K.} and Susan Curry and Prochaska, {James O.}",
year = "1999",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "290--298",
journal = "Annals of Behavioral Medicine",
issn = "0883-6612",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How effective is tailored print communication?

AU - Skinner, Celette Sugg

AU - Campbell, Marci K.

AU - Rimer, Barbara K.

AU - Curry, Susan

AU - Prochaska, James O.

PY - 1999

Y1 - 1999

N2 - This article reviews the 'first generation' of tailored print communications studies in the published literature, describing the purpose, theoretical framework, sample, research design, message type and source, outcomes measured, and findings of each. Eight studies compared tailored versus similar nontailored print; one compared tailored print versus an alternate intervention, and three included tailored print as one of several intervention components. Although studies varied by behavioral topic, type of tailoring, and measurement of behavioral outcomes, several themes persist. Compared to their nontailored counterparts, tailored print communications have been consistently better remembered, read, and perceived as relevant and/or credible. There is also evidence that tailored print communications are more effective for influencing health behaviors. Six of the eight tailored/nontailored comparisons found more behavior change among tailored than nontailored recipients. Tailored print communications have also demonstrated effectiveness as an adjunct to other intervention components such as self-help smoking cessation manuals. However, studies comparing tailored print communications with tailoring via other media such as telephone counseling have shown mixed results. Additional research is needed to assess whether the behavioral topic itself may make a difference in whether tailoring is appropriate and effective.

AB - This article reviews the 'first generation' of tailored print communications studies in the published literature, describing the purpose, theoretical framework, sample, research design, message type and source, outcomes measured, and findings of each. Eight studies compared tailored versus similar nontailored print; one compared tailored print versus an alternate intervention, and three included tailored print as one of several intervention components. Although studies varied by behavioral topic, type of tailoring, and measurement of behavioral outcomes, several themes persist. Compared to their nontailored counterparts, tailored print communications have been consistently better remembered, read, and perceived as relevant and/or credible. There is also evidence that tailored print communications are more effective for influencing health behaviors. Six of the eight tailored/nontailored comparisons found more behavior change among tailored than nontailored recipients. Tailored print communications have also demonstrated effectiveness as an adjunct to other intervention components such as self-help smoking cessation manuals. However, studies comparing tailored print communications with tailoring via other media such as telephone counseling have shown mixed results. Additional research is needed to assess whether the behavioral topic itself may make a difference in whether tailoring is appropriate and effective.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033502371&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033502371&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 10721435

AN - SCOPUS:0033502371

VL - 21

SP - 290

EP - 298

JO - Annals of Behavioral Medicine

JF - Annals of Behavioral Medicine

SN - 0883-6612

IS - 4

ER -