How much is a kidney worth? Cost-effectiveness of routine imaging after ureteroscopy to prevent silent obstruction

Tori N. Sutherland, Margaret S Pearle, Yair Lotan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The 2012 American Urological Association (AUA) Clinical Effectiveness Protocols for Imaging in the Management of Ureteral Calculous Disease recommends routine postoperative imaging after ureteroscopy. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of routine postoperative imaging after ureteroscopy. Materials and Methods: We searched the literature to determine the risk of complications after routine ureteroscopy for stones, including the incidence of postoperative pain, stricture and silent obstruction. Sequelae of renal loss due to undiagnosed silent obstruction may include chronic kidney disease, end stage renal disease and cardiovascular disease. Imaging and procedure costs were obtained from Medicare reimbursement rates and the literature. The costs and prevalence of lifetime complications associated with silent loss of 1 kidney were obtained from the renal donor transplant literature. A decision tree was constructed to calculate the cost of a strategy of routinely imaging all patients after ureteroscopy vs selective imaging based on postoperative pain. We performed 1-way and 2-way sensitivity analyses. Results: The average cost per patient of a strategy of routine imaging after ureteroscopy in all patients was $5,326 vs $5,196 for a strategy of selective imaging based on postoperative pain. Assuming a 2% rate of silent obstruction, the cost per kidney saved would be $6,262. Conclusions: While routine postoperative imaging carries a $130 per patient incrementally higher cost over that of a strategy of selective imaging in patients with postoperative pain, preventing renal loss and its attendant morbidity justifies the additional modest cost.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2136-2141
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Urology
Volume189
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2013

Fingerprint

Ureteroscopy
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Kidney
Costs and Cost Analysis
Postoperative Pain
Ureteral Diseases
Decision Trees
Clinical Protocols
Medicare
Chronic Renal Insufficiency
Chronic Kidney Failure
Pathologic Constriction
Cardiovascular Diseases
Tissue Donors
Morbidity
Incidence

Keywords

  • calculi
  • chronic
  • cost-benefit analysis
  • imaging
  • kidney failure
  • ureteral obstruction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

How much is a kidney worth? Cost-effectiveness of routine imaging after ureteroscopy to prevent silent obstruction. / Sutherland, Tori N.; Pearle, Margaret S; Lotan, Yair.

In: Journal of Urology, Vol. 189, No. 6, 06.2013, p. 2136-2141.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{03c582d4060947fc82dc03e177d3bfe8,
title = "How much is a kidney worth? Cost-effectiveness of routine imaging after ureteroscopy to prevent silent obstruction",
abstract = "Purpose: The 2012 American Urological Association (AUA) Clinical Effectiveness Protocols for Imaging in the Management of Ureteral Calculous Disease recommends routine postoperative imaging after ureteroscopy. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of routine postoperative imaging after ureteroscopy. Materials and Methods: We searched the literature to determine the risk of complications after routine ureteroscopy for stones, including the incidence of postoperative pain, stricture and silent obstruction. Sequelae of renal loss due to undiagnosed silent obstruction may include chronic kidney disease, end stage renal disease and cardiovascular disease. Imaging and procedure costs were obtained from Medicare reimbursement rates and the literature. The costs and prevalence of lifetime complications associated with silent loss of 1 kidney were obtained from the renal donor transplant literature. A decision tree was constructed to calculate the cost of a strategy of routinely imaging all patients after ureteroscopy vs selective imaging based on postoperative pain. We performed 1-way and 2-way sensitivity analyses. Results: The average cost per patient of a strategy of routine imaging after ureteroscopy in all patients was $5,326 vs $5,196 for a strategy of selective imaging based on postoperative pain. Assuming a 2{\%} rate of silent obstruction, the cost per kidney saved would be $6,262. Conclusions: While routine postoperative imaging carries a $130 per patient incrementally higher cost over that of a strategy of selective imaging in patients with postoperative pain, preventing renal loss and its attendant morbidity justifies the additional modest cost.",
keywords = "calculi, chronic, cost-benefit analysis, imaging, kidney failure, ureteral obstruction",
author = "Sutherland, {Tori N.} and Pearle, {Margaret S} and Yair Lotan",
year = "2013",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.juro.2012.12.059",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "189",
pages = "2136--2141",
journal = "Journal of Urology",
issn = "0022-5347",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How much is a kidney worth? Cost-effectiveness of routine imaging after ureteroscopy to prevent silent obstruction

AU - Sutherland, Tori N.

AU - Pearle, Margaret S

AU - Lotan, Yair

PY - 2013/6

Y1 - 2013/6

N2 - Purpose: The 2012 American Urological Association (AUA) Clinical Effectiveness Protocols for Imaging in the Management of Ureteral Calculous Disease recommends routine postoperative imaging after ureteroscopy. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of routine postoperative imaging after ureteroscopy. Materials and Methods: We searched the literature to determine the risk of complications after routine ureteroscopy for stones, including the incidence of postoperative pain, stricture and silent obstruction. Sequelae of renal loss due to undiagnosed silent obstruction may include chronic kidney disease, end stage renal disease and cardiovascular disease. Imaging and procedure costs were obtained from Medicare reimbursement rates and the literature. The costs and prevalence of lifetime complications associated with silent loss of 1 kidney were obtained from the renal donor transplant literature. A decision tree was constructed to calculate the cost of a strategy of routinely imaging all patients after ureteroscopy vs selective imaging based on postoperative pain. We performed 1-way and 2-way sensitivity analyses. Results: The average cost per patient of a strategy of routine imaging after ureteroscopy in all patients was $5,326 vs $5,196 for a strategy of selective imaging based on postoperative pain. Assuming a 2% rate of silent obstruction, the cost per kidney saved would be $6,262. Conclusions: While routine postoperative imaging carries a $130 per patient incrementally higher cost over that of a strategy of selective imaging in patients with postoperative pain, preventing renal loss and its attendant morbidity justifies the additional modest cost.

AB - Purpose: The 2012 American Urological Association (AUA) Clinical Effectiveness Protocols for Imaging in the Management of Ureteral Calculous Disease recommends routine postoperative imaging after ureteroscopy. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of routine postoperative imaging after ureteroscopy. Materials and Methods: We searched the literature to determine the risk of complications after routine ureteroscopy for stones, including the incidence of postoperative pain, stricture and silent obstruction. Sequelae of renal loss due to undiagnosed silent obstruction may include chronic kidney disease, end stage renal disease and cardiovascular disease. Imaging and procedure costs were obtained from Medicare reimbursement rates and the literature. The costs and prevalence of lifetime complications associated with silent loss of 1 kidney were obtained from the renal donor transplant literature. A decision tree was constructed to calculate the cost of a strategy of routinely imaging all patients after ureteroscopy vs selective imaging based on postoperative pain. We performed 1-way and 2-way sensitivity analyses. Results: The average cost per patient of a strategy of routine imaging after ureteroscopy in all patients was $5,326 vs $5,196 for a strategy of selective imaging based on postoperative pain. Assuming a 2% rate of silent obstruction, the cost per kidney saved would be $6,262. Conclusions: While routine postoperative imaging carries a $130 per patient incrementally higher cost over that of a strategy of selective imaging in patients with postoperative pain, preventing renal loss and its attendant morbidity justifies the additional modest cost.

KW - calculi

KW - chronic

KW - cost-benefit analysis

KW - imaging

KW - kidney failure

KW - ureteral obstruction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84877636519&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84877636519&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.juro.2012.12.059

DO - 10.1016/j.juro.2012.12.059

M3 - Article

C2 - 23276510

AN - SCOPUS:84877636519

VL - 189

SP - 2136

EP - 2141

JO - Journal of Urology

JF - Journal of Urology

SN - 0022-5347

IS - 6

ER -