TY - JOUR
T1 - How to manage family-centered rounds
AU - Kern, Jeremy
AU - Gay, Anna
AU - Mittal, Vineeta
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright 2016 by Turner White Communications Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2016/4
Y1 - 2016/4
N2 - • Objective: To present a model for operationalizing successful family-centered rounds (FCRs). • Methods: Literature review and experience with leading FCR workshops at national meetings. • Results: FCRs are multidisciplinary rounds that involve patients and families in decision-making. The model has gained substantial momentum nationally and is widely practiced in US pediatric hospitals. Many quality improvement-related FCR benefits have been identified, including improved parental satisfaction, communication, team-based practice, incorporation of practice guidelines, prevention of medication errors, and improved trainee and staff education and satisfaction. Physical and time constraints, variability in attending FCR style and teaching style, lack of FCR structure and process, specific and sensitive patient conditions, and language barriers are key challenges to implementing FCRs. Operationalizing a successful FCR program requires key stakeholders developing and defining a FCR process and structure, including developing a strong faculty development program. • Conclusion: FCR benefits for a health care system are many. Key stakeholders involvement, developing FCR "ground rules," troubleshooting FCR barriers, and developing a strong faculty development program are key to managing successful FCRs.
AB - • Objective: To present a model for operationalizing successful family-centered rounds (FCRs). • Methods: Literature review and experience with leading FCR workshops at national meetings. • Results: FCRs are multidisciplinary rounds that involve patients and families in decision-making. The model has gained substantial momentum nationally and is widely practiced in US pediatric hospitals. Many quality improvement-related FCR benefits have been identified, including improved parental satisfaction, communication, team-based practice, incorporation of practice guidelines, prevention of medication errors, and improved trainee and staff education and satisfaction. Physical and time constraints, variability in attending FCR style and teaching style, lack of FCR structure and process, specific and sensitive patient conditions, and language barriers are key challenges to implementing FCRs. Operationalizing a successful FCR program requires key stakeholders developing and defining a FCR process and structure, including developing a strong faculty development program. • Conclusion: FCR benefits for a health care system are many. Key stakeholders involvement, developing FCR "ground rules," troubleshooting FCR barriers, and developing a strong faculty development program are key to managing successful FCRs.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84963736215&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84963736215&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84963736215
SN - 1079-6533
VL - 23
SP - 164
EP - 172
JO - Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
JF - Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
IS - 4
ER -