TY - JOUR
T1 - How to Review a Manuscript
AU - Hill, Joseph A
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2016/3/1
Y1 - 2016/3/1
N2 - Manuscript peer review is fundamental to the evaluation and dissemination of modern science; it is the process whereby good science is enhanced and bad science is dismissed. Very little objective evidence, however, has been amassed to guide the manuscript peer review process. Rather, it is learned by experience and mentoring: by doing reviews, receiving reviews of one's own work, and by obtaining feedback from seasoned reviewers. Here, I lay out my perspective on this cornerstone of the scientific endeavor.
AB - Manuscript peer review is fundamental to the evaluation and dissemination of modern science; it is the process whereby good science is enhanced and bad science is dismissed. Very little objective evidence, however, has been amassed to guide the manuscript peer review process. Rather, it is learned by experience and mentoring: by doing reviews, receiving reviews of one's own work, and by obtaining feedback from seasoned reviewers. Here, I lay out my perspective on this cornerstone of the scientific endeavor.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84959558600&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84959558600&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2016.01.001
DO - 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2016.01.001
M3 - Review article
C2 - 26850498
AN - SCOPUS:84959558600
SN - 0022-0736
VL - 49
SP - 109
EP - 111
JO - Journal of Electrocardiology
JF - Journal of Electrocardiology
IS - 2
ER -