How to Review a Manuscript

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

Manuscript peer review is fundamental to the evaluation and dissemination of modern science; it is the process whereby good science is enhanced and bad science is dismissed. Very little objective evidence, however, has been amassed to guide the manuscript peer review process. Rather, it is learned by experience and mentoring: by doing reviews, receiving reviews of one's own work, and by obtaining feedback from seasoned reviewers. Here, I lay out my perspective on this cornerstone of the scientific endeavor.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)109-111
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of Electrocardiology
Volume49
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2016

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'How to Review a Manuscript'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this