How type of excuse defense, mock juror age, and defendant age affect mock jurors' decisions

Pamela L. Higgins, Wendy P. Heath, Bruce D. Grannemann

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The authors investigated the effects of mock juror age (younger vs. older), defendant age (22 vs. 65), and type of excuse defense used by defendants (a highly self-inflicted condition, Cocaine Dependency Disorder, vs. a less self-inflicted condition, Posttraumatic Stress Disorder) on mock juror decisions. Ninety-six younger and 96 older adults read a scenario and answered a questionnaire. Results indicated that the defendant using the highly self-inflicted excuse was more likely to receive a guilty verdict and a longer sentence than was the defendant using the less self-inflicted excuse. Older jurors were more certain of their verdicts and saw the defendant as more responsible for his condition than did younger jurors. Defendant age did not affect juror decisions. In addition, excuse type and juror age affected the jurors' perceptions of the victim's responsibility for the attack. The authors discuss the potential influence of juror age on perceptions of defendant responsibility.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)371-392
Number of pages22
JournalJournal of Social Psychology
Volume147
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2007

Fingerprint

Post-Traumatic Stress Disorders
Cocaine
Surveys and Questionnaires
Dependency (Psychology)

Keywords

  • Defendant age
  • Excuse defenses
  • Mock juror age
  • Psychology and law

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Social Psychology

Cite this

How type of excuse defense, mock juror age, and defendant age affect mock jurors' decisions. / Higgins, Pamela L.; Heath, Wendy P.; Grannemann, Bruce D.

In: Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 147, No. 4, 08.2007, p. 371-392.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Higgins, Pamela L. ; Heath, Wendy P. ; Grannemann, Bruce D. / How type of excuse defense, mock juror age, and defendant age affect mock jurors' decisions. In: Journal of Social Psychology. 2007 ; Vol. 147, No. 4. pp. 371-392.
@article{ccf14688b4524ab787a70a929350bc8c,
title = "How type of excuse defense, mock juror age, and defendant age affect mock jurors' decisions",
abstract = "The authors investigated the effects of mock juror age (younger vs. older), defendant age (22 vs. 65), and type of excuse defense used by defendants (a highly self-inflicted condition, Cocaine Dependency Disorder, vs. a less self-inflicted condition, Posttraumatic Stress Disorder) on mock juror decisions. Ninety-six younger and 96 older adults read a scenario and answered a questionnaire. Results indicated that the defendant using the highly self-inflicted excuse was more likely to receive a guilty verdict and a longer sentence than was the defendant using the less self-inflicted excuse. Older jurors were more certain of their verdicts and saw the defendant as more responsible for his condition than did younger jurors. Defendant age did not affect juror decisions. In addition, excuse type and juror age affected the jurors' perceptions of the victim's responsibility for the attack. The authors discuss the potential influence of juror age on perceptions of defendant responsibility.",
keywords = "Defendant age, Excuse defenses, Mock juror age, Psychology and law",
author = "Higgins, {Pamela L.} and Heath, {Wendy P.} and Grannemann, {Bruce D.}",
year = "2007",
month = "8",
doi = "10.3200/SOCP.147.4.371-392",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "147",
pages = "371--392",
journal = "Journal of Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-4545",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How type of excuse defense, mock juror age, and defendant age affect mock jurors' decisions

AU - Higgins, Pamela L.

AU - Heath, Wendy P.

AU - Grannemann, Bruce D.

PY - 2007/8

Y1 - 2007/8

N2 - The authors investigated the effects of mock juror age (younger vs. older), defendant age (22 vs. 65), and type of excuse defense used by defendants (a highly self-inflicted condition, Cocaine Dependency Disorder, vs. a less self-inflicted condition, Posttraumatic Stress Disorder) on mock juror decisions. Ninety-six younger and 96 older adults read a scenario and answered a questionnaire. Results indicated that the defendant using the highly self-inflicted excuse was more likely to receive a guilty verdict and a longer sentence than was the defendant using the less self-inflicted excuse. Older jurors were more certain of their verdicts and saw the defendant as more responsible for his condition than did younger jurors. Defendant age did not affect juror decisions. In addition, excuse type and juror age affected the jurors' perceptions of the victim's responsibility for the attack. The authors discuss the potential influence of juror age on perceptions of defendant responsibility.

AB - The authors investigated the effects of mock juror age (younger vs. older), defendant age (22 vs. 65), and type of excuse defense used by defendants (a highly self-inflicted condition, Cocaine Dependency Disorder, vs. a less self-inflicted condition, Posttraumatic Stress Disorder) on mock juror decisions. Ninety-six younger and 96 older adults read a scenario and answered a questionnaire. Results indicated that the defendant using the highly self-inflicted excuse was more likely to receive a guilty verdict and a longer sentence than was the defendant using the less self-inflicted excuse. Older jurors were more certain of their verdicts and saw the defendant as more responsible for his condition than did younger jurors. Defendant age did not affect juror decisions. In addition, excuse type and juror age affected the jurors' perceptions of the victim's responsibility for the attack. The authors discuss the potential influence of juror age on perceptions of defendant responsibility.

KW - Defendant age

KW - Excuse defenses

KW - Mock juror age

KW - Psychology and law

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=35448949123&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=35448949123&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3200/SOCP.147.4.371-392

DO - 10.3200/SOCP.147.4.371-392

M3 - Article

C2 - 17955749

AN - SCOPUS:35448949123

VL - 147

SP - 371

EP - 392

JO - Journal of Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Social Psychology

SN - 0022-4545

IS - 4

ER -