Hybrid laparoscopic flexure takedown and open procedure for rectal resection is associated with significantly shorter length of stay than equivalent open resection

Sivamainthan Vithiananthan, Zara Cooper, Karen Betten, George S. Stapleton, Joseph Carter, Emina H. Huang, Richard L. Whelan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic-assisted, sphincter-saving resection (largest incision < 7 cm) of the middle and distal rectum is technically very difficult and, with regard to cancers, has not been demonstrated to be oncologically safe. The hypothesis of this retrospective study is that a hybrid operation that combines laparoscopic and open methods would be associated with short-term outcome benefits compared with open surgery results for patients undergoing sphincter-saving proctectomy. METHODS: A total of 31 hybrid and 25 fully open rectal resection patients were compared in this retrospective review. All patients had splenic flexure take-down and rectal anastomosis. The hybrid approach consisted of laparoscopic splenic flexure takedown (with or without partial rectal mobilization and devascularization) followed by completion of the procedure via infraumbilical midline laparotomy. The indication was neoplasm in 87 percent of hybrid patients and in 68 percent of open patients. The majority of tumors were located between 4 and 10 cm from the dentate line. RESULTS: Fifty-eight percent of hybrid and 68 percent of open patients had low anterior or coloanal resections, and 48 percent of hybrid and 64 percent of open patients underwent temporary diversion via ileostomy. The mean hybrid midline incision length was 11 cm compared with 24 cm for open patients (P < 0.0001). The neoplastic specimens were similar with regard to margins and lymph node harvest. Similar complication rates were noted in both groups. Nonsignificant benefits for hybrid patients (0.9-1.2 days) were seen with regard to length of time until toleration of liquid or solid diet and first flatus. Hybrid patients experienced their first bowel movements 4.1 days vs. 5.7 days for the open group (P = 0.03). Mean length of stay was significantly shorter for hybrid patients (6.1. days) than for open patients (11.1 days; P = 0.0006). CONCLUSION: This preliminary retrospective study suggests that a combined hybrid laparoscopic and open approach to sphincter-saving proctectomy permits a similar resection as open methods and may be associated with a length-of-stay benefit and more rapid return of bowel function. Prospective studies will be needed before any firm conclusions can be drawn.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)927-935
Number of pages9
JournalDiseases of the Colon and Rectum
Volume44
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - 2001
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Colorectal
  • Hybrid method
  • Laparoscopic
  • Minilaparotomy
  • Minimally invasive
  • Sphincter-saving proctectomy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Hybrid laparoscopic flexure takedown and open procedure for rectal resection is associated with significantly shorter length of stay than equivalent open resection'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this