Identifying existing Choosing Wisely recommendations of high relevance and importance to hematology

Lisa K. Hicks, Anita Rajasekhar, Harriet Bering, Kenneth R. Carson, Judith Kleinerman, Vishal Kukreti, Alice Ma, Brigitta U. Mueller, Sarah H. O'Brien, Julie A. Panepinto, Marcelo C. Pasquini, Ravi Sarode, William A. Wood

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Choosing Wisely (CW) is a medical stewardship initiative led by the American Board of Internal Medicine Foundation in collaboration with professional medical societies in the United States. In an effort to learn from and leverage the work of others, the American Society of Hematology CW Task Force developed a method to identify and prioritize CW recommendations from other medical societies of high relevance and importance to patients with blood disorders and their physicians. All 380 CW recommendations were reviewed and assessed for relevance and importance. Relevance was assessed using the MORETM relevance scale. Importance was assessed with regard to six guiding principles: harm avoidance, evidence, aggregate cost, relevance, frequency and impact. Harm avoidance was considered the most important principle. Ten highly relevant and important recommendations were identified from a variety of professional societies. Recommendations focused on decreasing unnecessary imaging, blood work, treatments and transfusions, as well as on increasing collaboration across disciplines and considering value when recommending treatments. Many CW recommendations have relevance beyond the society of origin. The methods developed by the ASH CW Task Force could be easily adapted by other Societies to identify additional CW recommendations of relevance and importance to their fields. Am. J. Hematol. 91:787–792, 2016.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)787-792
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Journal of Hematology
Volume91
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2016

Fingerprint

Hematology
Medical Societies
Advisory Committees
Internal Medicine
Physicians
Costs and Cost Analysis
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hematology

Cite this

Hicks, L. K., Rajasekhar, A., Bering, H., Carson, K. R., Kleinerman, J., Kukreti, V., ... Wood, W. A. (2016). Identifying existing Choosing Wisely recommendations of high relevance and importance to hematology. American Journal of Hematology, 91(8), 787-792. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.24412

Identifying existing Choosing Wisely recommendations of high relevance and importance to hematology. / Hicks, Lisa K.; Rajasekhar, Anita; Bering, Harriet; Carson, Kenneth R.; Kleinerman, Judith; Kukreti, Vishal; Ma, Alice; Mueller, Brigitta U.; O'Brien, Sarah H.; Panepinto, Julie A.; Pasquini, Marcelo C.; Sarode, Ravi; Wood, William A.

In: American Journal of Hematology, Vol. 91, No. 8, 01.08.2016, p. 787-792.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hicks, LK, Rajasekhar, A, Bering, H, Carson, KR, Kleinerman, J, Kukreti, V, Ma, A, Mueller, BU, O'Brien, SH, Panepinto, JA, Pasquini, MC, Sarode, R & Wood, WA 2016, 'Identifying existing Choosing Wisely recommendations of high relevance and importance to hematology', American Journal of Hematology, vol. 91, no. 8, pp. 787-792. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.24412
Hicks, Lisa K. ; Rajasekhar, Anita ; Bering, Harriet ; Carson, Kenneth R. ; Kleinerman, Judith ; Kukreti, Vishal ; Ma, Alice ; Mueller, Brigitta U. ; O'Brien, Sarah H. ; Panepinto, Julie A. ; Pasquini, Marcelo C. ; Sarode, Ravi ; Wood, William A. / Identifying existing Choosing Wisely recommendations of high relevance and importance to hematology. In: American Journal of Hematology. 2016 ; Vol. 91, No. 8. pp. 787-792.
@article{f2ffb85e08184c3aa1944c61f7cd3036,
title = "Identifying existing Choosing Wisely recommendations of high relevance and importance to hematology",
abstract = "Choosing Wisely (CW) is a medical stewardship initiative led by the American Board of Internal Medicine Foundation in collaboration with professional medical societies in the United States. In an effort to learn from and leverage the work of others, the American Society of Hematology CW Task Force developed a method to identify and prioritize CW recommendations from other medical societies of high relevance and importance to patients with blood disorders and their physicians. All 380 CW recommendations were reviewed and assessed for relevance and importance. Relevance was assessed using the MORETM relevance scale. Importance was assessed with regard to six guiding principles: harm avoidance, evidence, aggregate cost, relevance, frequency and impact. Harm avoidance was considered the most important principle. Ten highly relevant and important recommendations were identified from a variety of professional societies. Recommendations focused on decreasing unnecessary imaging, blood work, treatments and transfusions, as well as on increasing collaboration across disciplines and considering value when recommending treatments. Many CW recommendations have relevance beyond the society of origin. The methods developed by the ASH CW Task Force could be easily adapted by other Societies to identify additional CW recommendations of relevance and importance to their fields. Am. J. Hematol. 91:787–792, 2016.",
author = "Hicks, {Lisa K.} and Anita Rajasekhar and Harriet Bering and Carson, {Kenneth R.} and Judith Kleinerman and Vishal Kukreti and Alice Ma and Mueller, {Brigitta U.} and O'Brien, {Sarah H.} and Panepinto, {Julie A.} and Pasquini, {Marcelo C.} and Ravi Sarode and Wood, {William A.}",
year = "2016",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/ajh.24412",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "91",
pages = "787--792",
journal = "American Journal of Hematology",
issn = "0361-8609",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Identifying existing Choosing Wisely recommendations of high relevance and importance to hematology

AU - Hicks, Lisa K.

AU - Rajasekhar, Anita

AU - Bering, Harriet

AU - Carson, Kenneth R.

AU - Kleinerman, Judith

AU - Kukreti, Vishal

AU - Ma, Alice

AU - Mueller, Brigitta U.

AU - O'Brien, Sarah H.

AU - Panepinto, Julie A.

AU - Pasquini, Marcelo C.

AU - Sarode, Ravi

AU - Wood, William A.

PY - 2016/8/1

Y1 - 2016/8/1

N2 - Choosing Wisely (CW) is a medical stewardship initiative led by the American Board of Internal Medicine Foundation in collaboration with professional medical societies in the United States. In an effort to learn from and leverage the work of others, the American Society of Hematology CW Task Force developed a method to identify and prioritize CW recommendations from other medical societies of high relevance and importance to patients with blood disorders and their physicians. All 380 CW recommendations were reviewed and assessed for relevance and importance. Relevance was assessed using the MORETM relevance scale. Importance was assessed with regard to six guiding principles: harm avoidance, evidence, aggregate cost, relevance, frequency and impact. Harm avoidance was considered the most important principle. Ten highly relevant and important recommendations were identified from a variety of professional societies. Recommendations focused on decreasing unnecessary imaging, blood work, treatments and transfusions, as well as on increasing collaboration across disciplines and considering value when recommending treatments. Many CW recommendations have relevance beyond the society of origin. The methods developed by the ASH CW Task Force could be easily adapted by other Societies to identify additional CW recommendations of relevance and importance to their fields. Am. J. Hematol. 91:787–792, 2016.

AB - Choosing Wisely (CW) is a medical stewardship initiative led by the American Board of Internal Medicine Foundation in collaboration with professional medical societies in the United States. In an effort to learn from and leverage the work of others, the American Society of Hematology CW Task Force developed a method to identify and prioritize CW recommendations from other medical societies of high relevance and importance to patients with blood disorders and their physicians. All 380 CW recommendations were reviewed and assessed for relevance and importance. Relevance was assessed using the MORETM relevance scale. Importance was assessed with regard to six guiding principles: harm avoidance, evidence, aggregate cost, relevance, frequency and impact. Harm avoidance was considered the most important principle. Ten highly relevant and important recommendations were identified from a variety of professional societies. Recommendations focused on decreasing unnecessary imaging, blood work, treatments and transfusions, as well as on increasing collaboration across disciplines and considering value when recommending treatments. Many CW recommendations have relevance beyond the society of origin. The methods developed by the ASH CW Task Force could be easily adapted by other Societies to identify additional CW recommendations of relevance and importance to their fields. Am. J. Hematol. 91:787–792, 2016.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84978252396&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84978252396&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/ajh.24412

DO - 10.1002/ajh.24412

M3 - Article

C2 - 27152483

AN - SCOPUS:84978252396

VL - 91

SP - 787

EP - 792

JO - American Journal of Hematology

JF - American Journal of Hematology

SN - 0361-8609

IS - 8

ER -