Identifying quality improvement targets to facilitate colorectal cancer screening completion

Simon J.Craddock Lee, Stephen J. Inrig, Bijal A. Balasubramanian, Celette Sugg Skinner, Robin T. Higashi, Katharine McCallister, Wendy Pechero Bishop, Noel O. Santini, Jasmin A. Tiro

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The colorectal cancer (CRC) screening process involves multiple interfaces (communication exchanges and transfers of responsibility for specific actions) among primary care and gastroenterology providers, laboratory, and administrative staff. After a retrospective electronic health record (EHR) analysis discovered substantial clinic variation and low CRC screening prevalence overall in an urban, integrated safety-net system, we launched a qualitative analysis to identify potential quality improvement targets to enhance fecal immunochemical test (FIT) completion, the system's preferred screening modality. Here, we report examination of organization-, clinic-, and provider-level interfaces over a three-year period (December 2011–October 2014). We deployed in parallel 3 qualitative data collection methods: (1) structured observation (90+ hours, 10 sites); (2) document analysis (n > 100); and (3) semi-structured interviews (n = 41) and conducted iterative thematic analysis in which findings from each method cross-informed subsequent data collection. Thematic analysis was guided by a conceptual model and applied deductive and inductive codes. There was substantial variation in protocols for distributing and returning FIT kits both within and across clinics. Providers, clinic and laboratory staff had differing access to important data about FIT results based on clinical information system used and this affected results reporting. Communication and coordination during electronic referrals for diagnostic colonoscopy was suboptimal particularly for co-morbid patients needing anesthesia clearance. Our multi-level approach elucidated organizational deficiencies not evident by quantitative analysis alone. Findings indicate potential quality improvement intervention targets including: (1) best-practices implementation across clinics; (2) detailed communication to providers about FIT results; and (3) creation of EHR alerts to resolve pending colonoscopy referrals before they expire.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)138-143
Number of pages6
JournalPreventive Medicine Reports
Volume9
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2018

Fingerprint

Quality Improvement
Early Detection of Cancer
Colorectal Neoplasms
Electronic Health Records
Communication
Colonoscopy
Referral and Consultation
Gastroenterology
Practice Guidelines
Information Systems
Primary Health Care
Anesthesia
Observation
Organizations
Interviews
Safety

Keywords

  • Cancer screening
  • Evaluation methodology
  • Health services research
  • Information technology
  • Qualitative research
  • Quality improvement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Informatics
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Identifying quality improvement targets to facilitate colorectal cancer screening completion. / Lee, Simon J.Craddock; Inrig, Stephen J.; Balasubramanian, Bijal A.; Skinner, Celette Sugg; Higashi, Robin T.; McCallister, Katharine; Bishop, Wendy Pechero; Santini, Noel O.; Tiro, Jasmin A.

In: Preventive Medicine Reports, Vol. 9, 01.03.2018, p. 138-143.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lee, Simon J.Craddock ; Inrig, Stephen J. ; Balasubramanian, Bijal A. ; Skinner, Celette Sugg ; Higashi, Robin T. ; McCallister, Katharine ; Bishop, Wendy Pechero ; Santini, Noel O. ; Tiro, Jasmin A. / Identifying quality improvement targets to facilitate colorectal cancer screening completion. In: Preventive Medicine Reports. 2018 ; Vol. 9. pp. 138-143.
@article{21ac03655be441c4ae7f3af4091ccadc,
title = "Identifying quality improvement targets to facilitate colorectal cancer screening completion",
abstract = "The colorectal cancer (CRC) screening process involves multiple interfaces (communication exchanges and transfers of responsibility for specific actions) among primary care and gastroenterology providers, laboratory, and administrative staff. After a retrospective electronic health record (EHR) analysis discovered substantial clinic variation and low CRC screening prevalence overall in an urban, integrated safety-net system, we launched a qualitative analysis to identify potential quality improvement targets to enhance fecal immunochemical test (FIT) completion, the system's preferred screening modality. Here, we report examination of organization-, clinic-, and provider-level interfaces over a three-year period (December 2011–October 2014). We deployed in parallel 3 qualitative data collection methods: (1) structured observation (90+ hours, 10 sites); (2) document analysis (n > 100); and (3) semi-structured interviews (n = 41) and conducted iterative thematic analysis in which findings from each method cross-informed subsequent data collection. Thematic analysis was guided by a conceptual model and applied deductive and inductive codes. There was substantial variation in protocols for distributing and returning FIT kits both within and across clinics. Providers, clinic and laboratory staff had differing access to important data about FIT results based on clinical information system used and this affected results reporting. Communication and coordination during electronic referrals for diagnostic colonoscopy was suboptimal particularly for co-morbid patients needing anesthesia clearance. Our multi-level approach elucidated organizational deficiencies not evident by quantitative analysis alone. Findings indicate potential quality improvement intervention targets including: (1) best-practices implementation across clinics; (2) detailed communication to providers about FIT results; and (3) creation of EHR alerts to resolve pending colonoscopy referrals before they expire.",
keywords = "Cancer screening, Evaluation methodology, Health services research, Information technology, Qualitative research, Quality improvement",
author = "Lee, {Simon J.Craddock} and Inrig, {Stephen J.} and Balasubramanian, {Bijal A.} and Skinner, {Celette Sugg} and Higashi, {Robin T.} and Katharine McCallister and Bishop, {Wendy Pechero} and Santini, {Noel O.} and Tiro, {Jasmin A.}",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.01.004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "138--143",
journal = "Preventive Medicine Reports",
issn = "2211-3355",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Identifying quality improvement targets to facilitate colorectal cancer screening completion

AU - Lee, Simon J.Craddock

AU - Inrig, Stephen J.

AU - Balasubramanian, Bijal A.

AU - Skinner, Celette Sugg

AU - Higashi, Robin T.

AU - McCallister, Katharine

AU - Bishop, Wendy Pechero

AU - Santini, Noel O.

AU - Tiro, Jasmin A.

PY - 2018/3/1

Y1 - 2018/3/1

N2 - The colorectal cancer (CRC) screening process involves multiple interfaces (communication exchanges and transfers of responsibility for specific actions) among primary care and gastroenterology providers, laboratory, and administrative staff. After a retrospective electronic health record (EHR) analysis discovered substantial clinic variation and low CRC screening prevalence overall in an urban, integrated safety-net system, we launched a qualitative analysis to identify potential quality improvement targets to enhance fecal immunochemical test (FIT) completion, the system's preferred screening modality. Here, we report examination of organization-, clinic-, and provider-level interfaces over a three-year period (December 2011–October 2014). We deployed in parallel 3 qualitative data collection methods: (1) structured observation (90+ hours, 10 sites); (2) document analysis (n > 100); and (3) semi-structured interviews (n = 41) and conducted iterative thematic analysis in which findings from each method cross-informed subsequent data collection. Thematic analysis was guided by a conceptual model and applied deductive and inductive codes. There was substantial variation in protocols for distributing and returning FIT kits both within and across clinics. Providers, clinic and laboratory staff had differing access to important data about FIT results based on clinical information system used and this affected results reporting. Communication and coordination during electronic referrals for diagnostic colonoscopy was suboptimal particularly for co-morbid patients needing anesthesia clearance. Our multi-level approach elucidated organizational deficiencies not evident by quantitative analysis alone. Findings indicate potential quality improvement intervention targets including: (1) best-practices implementation across clinics; (2) detailed communication to providers about FIT results; and (3) creation of EHR alerts to resolve pending colonoscopy referrals before they expire.

AB - The colorectal cancer (CRC) screening process involves multiple interfaces (communication exchanges and transfers of responsibility for specific actions) among primary care and gastroenterology providers, laboratory, and administrative staff. After a retrospective electronic health record (EHR) analysis discovered substantial clinic variation and low CRC screening prevalence overall in an urban, integrated safety-net system, we launched a qualitative analysis to identify potential quality improvement targets to enhance fecal immunochemical test (FIT) completion, the system's preferred screening modality. Here, we report examination of organization-, clinic-, and provider-level interfaces over a three-year period (December 2011–October 2014). We deployed in parallel 3 qualitative data collection methods: (1) structured observation (90+ hours, 10 sites); (2) document analysis (n > 100); and (3) semi-structured interviews (n = 41) and conducted iterative thematic analysis in which findings from each method cross-informed subsequent data collection. Thematic analysis was guided by a conceptual model and applied deductive and inductive codes. There was substantial variation in protocols for distributing and returning FIT kits both within and across clinics. Providers, clinic and laboratory staff had differing access to important data about FIT results based on clinical information system used and this affected results reporting. Communication and coordination during electronic referrals for diagnostic colonoscopy was suboptimal particularly for co-morbid patients needing anesthesia clearance. Our multi-level approach elucidated organizational deficiencies not evident by quantitative analysis alone. Findings indicate potential quality improvement intervention targets including: (1) best-practices implementation across clinics; (2) detailed communication to providers about FIT results; and (3) creation of EHR alerts to resolve pending colonoscopy referrals before they expire.

KW - Cancer screening

KW - Evaluation methodology

KW - Health services research

KW - Information technology

KW - Qualitative research

KW - Quality improvement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041467703&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85041467703&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.01.004

DO - 10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.01.004

M3 - Article

C2 - 29527466

AN - SCOPUS:85041467703

VL - 9

SP - 138

EP - 143

JO - Preventive Medicine Reports

JF - Preventive Medicine Reports

SN - 2211-3355

ER -