Abstract
Heitjan and Rubin (1991, Annals of Statistics 19, 2244-2253) define data to be 'coarse' when one observes not the exact value of the data but only some set (a subset of the sample space) that contains the exact value. This definition covers a number of incomplete-data problems arising in biomedicine, including rounded, heaped, censored, and missing data. In analyzing coarse data, it is common to proceed as though the degree of coarseness is fixed in advance-in a word, to ignore the randomness in the coarsening mechanism. When coarsening is actually stochastic, however, inferences that ignore this randomness may be seriously misleading. Heitjan and Rubin (1991) have proposed a general model of data coarsening and established conditions under which it is appropriate to ignore the stochastic nature of the coarsening. The conditions are that the data be coarsened at random [a generalization of missing at random (Rubin, 1976, Biometrika 63, 581-592)] and that the parameters of the data and the coarsening process be distinct. This article presents detailed applications of the general model and the ignorability conditions to a variety of coarse-data problems arising in biomedical statistics. A reanalysis of the Stanford Heart Transplant Data (Crowley and Hu, 1977, Journal of the American Statistical Association 72, 27-36) reveals significant evidence that censoring of pretransplant survival times by transplantation was nonignorable, suggesting a greater benefit from cardiac transplantation than previous analyses had found.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1099-1109 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | Biometrics |
| Volume | 49 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| State | Published - Dec 1 1993 |
Fingerprint
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)
- Applied Mathematics
- Statistics and Probability
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Cite this
Ignorability and coarse data : Some biomedical examples. / Heitjan, D. F.
In: Biometrics, Vol. 49, No. 4, 01.12.1993, p. 1099-1109.Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Ignorability and coarse data
T2 - Some biomedical examples
AU - Heitjan, D. F.
PY - 1993/12/1
Y1 - 1993/12/1
N2 - Heitjan and Rubin (1991, Annals of Statistics 19, 2244-2253) define data to be 'coarse' when one observes not the exact value of the data but only some set (a subset of the sample space) that contains the exact value. This definition covers a number of incomplete-data problems arising in biomedicine, including rounded, heaped, censored, and missing data. In analyzing coarse data, it is common to proceed as though the degree of coarseness is fixed in advance-in a word, to ignore the randomness in the coarsening mechanism. When coarsening is actually stochastic, however, inferences that ignore this randomness may be seriously misleading. Heitjan and Rubin (1991) have proposed a general model of data coarsening and established conditions under which it is appropriate to ignore the stochastic nature of the coarsening. The conditions are that the data be coarsened at random [a generalization of missing at random (Rubin, 1976, Biometrika 63, 581-592)] and that the parameters of the data and the coarsening process be distinct. This article presents detailed applications of the general model and the ignorability conditions to a variety of coarse-data problems arising in biomedical statistics. A reanalysis of the Stanford Heart Transplant Data (Crowley and Hu, 1977, Journal of the American Statistical Association 72, 27-36) reveals significant evidence that censoring of pretransplant survival times by transplantation was nonignorable, suggesting a greater benefit from cardiac transplantation than previous analyses had found.
AB - Heitjan and Rubin (1991, Annals of Statistics 19, 2244-2253) define data to be 'coarse' when one observes not the exact value of the data but only some set (a subset of the sample space) that contains the exact value. This definition covers a number of incomplete-data problems arising in biomedicine, including rounded, heaped, censored, and missing data. In analyzing coarse data, it is common to proceed as though the degree of coarseness is fixed in advance-in a word, to ignore the randomness in the coarsening mechanism. When coarsening is actually stochastic, however, inferences that ignore this randomness may be seriously misleading. Heitjan and Rubin (1991) have proposed a general model of data coarsening and established conditions under which it is appropriate to ignore the stochastic nature of the coarsening. The conditions are that the data be coarsened at random [a generalization of missing at random (Rubin, 1976, Biometrika 63, 581-592)] and that the parameters of the data and the coarsening process be distinct. This article presents detailed applications of the general model and the ignorability conditions to a variety of coarse-data problems arising in biomedical statistics. A reanalysis of the Stanford Heart Transplant Data (Crowley and Hu, 1977, Journal of the American Statistical Association 72, 27-36) reveals significant evidence that censoring of pretransplant survival times by transplantation was nonignorable, suggesting a greater benefit from cardiac transplantation than previous analyses had found.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027756948&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027756948&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Review article
C2 - 8117903
AN - SCOPUS:0027756948
VL - 49
SP - 1099
EP - 1109
JO - Biometrics
JF - Biometrics
SN - 0006-341X
IS - 4
ER -