Imitation-based aphasia therapy increases narrative content: A case series

E. Susan Duncan, Steven L. Small

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To test the generalization of an intensive imitation-based aphasia therapy to an unrelated narrative production task. Design: ABA design study (A= no treatment; B= treatment) comparing imitation therapy to a baseline condition (pre-therapy). Participants produced narratives at two pre-therapy and two post-therapy time points. Narratives were analyzed for correct information units to determine the number and percent of communicative words produced. Setting: A rehabilitation clinic and participants' homes. Participants: Nineteen people with chronic aphasia following left hemisphere stroke. Interventions: Six weeks of intensive imitation therapy (3 x 30 minutes/day; 6 days/week) of words and phrases delivered via dedicated laptop. Main measures: We performed t-tests to assess post-therapy changes in narrative production, as well as for intervals during which no intervention was provided. We used stepwise regression to examine the predictive value of demographic, behavioral, and neurological variables in determining treatment outcome. Results: Significant gains were made on the narrative production task in both the number (mean = 34.36; p = 0.009) and percent (mean = 3.99; p = 0.023) of correct information units produced. For percent of correct information units, the number of therapy sessions completed was the sole predictor of changes in production following therapy (r= +0.542; p = 0.020). No variables predicted change in number of correct information units produced. There were no significant differences between the two pre-therapy or the two post-therapy time points (p > 0.294). Conclusions: Intensive imitation-based aphasia therapy may promote generalization to an unrelated narrative production task. Further investigation is indicated.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1500-1507
Number of pages8
JournalClinical Rehabilitation
Volume31
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Narrative Therapy
Aphasia
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Aphasia
  • generalization
  • neurological rehabilitation
  • speech-language therapy
  • stroke

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

Imitation-based aphasia therapy increases narrative content : A case series. / Duncan, E. Susan; Small, Steven L.

In: Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 31, No. 11, 01.11.2017, p. 1500-1507.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9bbc222388cb46d0bede29866c9a77bd,
title = "Imitation-based aphasia therapy increases narrative content: A case series",
abstract = "Objective: To test the generalization of an intensive imitation-based aphasia therapy to an unrelated narrative production task. Design: ABA design study (A= no treatment; B= treatment) comparing imitation therapy to a baseline condition (pre-therapy). Participants produced narratives at two pre-therapy and two post-therapy time points. Narratives were analyzed for correct information units to determine the number and percent of communicative words produced. Setting: A rehabilitation clinic and participants' homes. Participants: Nineteen people with chronic aphasia following left hemisphere stroke. Interventions: Six weeks of intensive imitation therapy (3 x 30 minutes/day; 6 days/week) of words and phrases delivered via dedicated laptop. Main measures: We performed t-tests to assess post-therapy changes in narrative production, as well as for intervals during which no intervention was provided. We used stepwise regression to examine the predictive value of demographic, behavioral, and neurological variables in determining treatment outcome. Results: Significant gains were made on the narrative production task in both the number (mean = 34.36; p = 0.009) and percent (mean = 3.99; p = 0.023) of correct information units produced. For percent of correct information units, the number of therapy sessions completed was the sole predictor of changes in production following therapy (r= +0.542; p = 0.020). No variables predicted change in number of correct information units produced. There were no significant differences between the two pre-therapy or the two post-therapy time points (p > 0.294). Conclusions: Intensive imitation-based aphasia therapy may promote generalization to an unrelated narrative production task. Further investigation is indicated.",
keywords = "Aphasia, generalization, neurological rehabilitation, speech-language therapy, stroke",
author = "Duncan, {E. Susan} and Small, {Steven L.}",
year = "2017",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0269215517703765",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "1500--1507",
journal = "Clinical Rehabilitation",
issn = "0269-2155",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Imitation-based aphasia therapy increases narrative content

T2 - A case series

AU - Duncan, E. Susan

AU - Small, Steven L.

PY - 2017/11/1

Y1 - 2017/11/1

N2 - Objective: To test the generalization of an intensive imitation-based aphasia therapy to an unrelated narrative production task. Design: ABA design study (A= no treatment; B= treatment) comparing imitation therapy to a baseline condition (pre-therapy). Participants produced narratives at two pre-therapy and two post-therapy time points. Narratives were analyzed for correct information units to determine the number and percent of communicative words produced. Setting: A rehabilitation clinic and participants' homes. Participants: Nineteen people with chronic aphasia following left hemisphere stroke. Interventions: Six weeks of intensive imitation therapy (3 x 30 minutes/day; 6 days/week) of words and phrases delivered via dedicated laptop. Main measures: We performed t-tests to assess post-therapy changes in narrative production, as well as for intervals during which no intervention was provided. We used stepwise regression to examine the predictive value of demographic, behavioral, and neurological variables in determining treatment outcome. Results: Significant gains were made on the narrative production task in both the number (mean = 34.36; p = 0.009) and percent (mean = 3.99; p = 0.023) of correct information units produced. For percent of correct information units, the number of therapy sessions completed was the sole predictor of changes in production following therapy (r= +0.542; p = 0.020). No variables predicted change in number of correct information units produced. There were no significant differences between the two pre-therapy or the two post-therapy time points (p > 0.294). Conclusions: Intensive imitation-based aphasia therapy may promote generalization to an unrelated narrative production task. Further investigation is indicated.

AB - Objective: To test the generalization of an intensive imitation-based aphasia therapy to an unrelated narrative production task. Design: ABA design study (A= no treatment; B= treatment) comparing imitation therapy to a baseline condition (pre-therapy). Participants produced narratives at two pre-therapy and two post-therapy time points. Narratives were analyzed for correct information units to determine the number and percent of communicative words produced. Setting: A rehabilitation clinic and participants' homes. Participants: Nineteen people with chronic aphasia following left hemisphere stroke. Interventions: Six weeks of intensive imitation therapy (3 x 30 minutes/day; 6 days/week) of words and phrases delivered via dedicated laptop. Main measures: We performed t-tests to assess post-therapy changes in narrative production, as well as for intervals during which no intervention was provided. We used stepwise regression to examine the predictive value of demographic, behavioral, and neurological variables in determining treatment outcome. Results: Significant gains were made on the narrative production task in both the number (mean = 34.36; p = 0.009) and percent (mean = 3.99; p = 0.023) of correct information units produced. For percent of correct information units, the number of therapy sessions completed was the sole predictor of changes in production following therapy (r= +0.542; p = 0.020). No variables predicted change in number of correct information units produced. There were no significant differences between the two pre-therapy or the two post-therapy time points (p > 0.294). Conclusions: Intensive imitation-based aphasia therapy may promote generalization to an unrelated narrative production task. Further investigation is indicated.

KW - Aphasia

KW - generalization

KW - neurological rehabilitation

KW - speech-language therapy

KW - stroke

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85024486052&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85024486052&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0269215517703765

DO - 10.1177/0269215517703765

M3 - Article

C2 - 28393551

AN - SCOPUS:85024486052

VL - 31

SP - 1500

EP - 1507

JO - Clinical Rehabilitation

JF - Clinical Rehabilitation

SN - 0269-2155

IS - 11

ER -