Impact of blood pressure cuff inflation rates on flow-mediated dilatation and contralateral arm response

H. F. Lin, M. S. Dhindsa, T. Tarumi, S. C. Miles, D. Umpierre, H. Tanaka

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) is widely used as an index of nitric oxide-mediated vasodilator function, yet its methodology has not been well established. Previous research indicates that a rapid inflation of a blood pressure cuff evokes systemic vasoconstriction, as it was observed even on non-occluded contralateral arm. This would potentially contribute to the variability of FMD readings and complicate the emerging evidence that nonoccluded contralateral arm fingertip temperature responses during the FMD procedure may be an indicator of the presence of coronary artery disease. To test the hypotheses that rapid inflation of a blood pressure cuff could reduce FMD values and influence contralateral vasodilatory states, 33 apparently healthy adults (18 males and 15 females, 29±6 years) were studied in two randomized FMD trials. The blood flow-occluding cuff was inflated rapidly (<1s) in one trial or slowly over 10 s in the other trial. Arterial diameter, fingertip temperature and infrared thermography were obtained throughout each session. FMD values were not different between the rapid and slow cuff inflation trials (5.9±0.6 vs 5.9±0.4%). There were no differences in reactive hyperaemia (6.4±1.6 vs 6.2±1.7AU), shear stress (80±20 vs 77±17 dyncm -2) and fingertip temperature rebound (TR; 1.8±1.2 vs 1.9±1.0 1C) between the rapid and slow inflation. Changes in finger temperature on the contralateral (non-occluded) arm were positively associated with those on the occluded arm (r=0.26 to 0.61, P<0.05). We concluded that rates of inflating a blood pressure cuff do not affect FMD and TR response, and that neurovascularinduced vasodilatation of the contralateral arm was not observed regardless of cuff inflation rates.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)35-40
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Human Hypertension
Volume26
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2012

Fingerprint

Economic Inflation
Dilatation
Arm
Blood Pressure
Temperature
Hyperemia
Vasoconstriction
Vasodilator Agents
Vasodilation
Fingers
Reading
Coronary Artery Disease
Nitric Oxide
Research

Keywords

  • endothelium-dependent vasodilatation
  • opposite arm
  • vascular reactivity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Cite this

Impact of blood pressure cuff inflation rates on flow-mediated dilatation and contralateral arm response. / Lin, H. F.; Dhindsa, M. S.; Tarumi, T.; Miles, S. C.; Umpierre, D.; Tanaka, H.

In: Journal of Human Hypertension, Vol. 26, No. 1, 01.01.2012, p. 35-40.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lin, H. F. ; Dhindsa, M. S. ; Tarumi, T. ; Miles, S. C. ; Umpierre, D. ; Tanaka, H. / Impact of blood pressure cuff inflation rates on flow-mediated dilatation and contralateral arm response. In: Journal of Human Hypertension. 2012 ; Vol. 26, No. 1. pp. 35-40.
@article{41aa5e5b7cd749b1a2109ddea3c72276,
title = "Impact of blood pressure cuff inflation rates on flow-mediated dilatation and contralateral arm response",
abstract = "Flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) is widely used as an index of nitric oxide-mediated vasodilator function, yet its methodology has not been well established. Previous research indicates that a rapid inflation of a blood pressure cuff evokes systemic vasoconstriction, as it was observed even on non-occluded contralateral arm. This would potentially contribute to the variability of FMD readings and complicate the emerging evidence that nonoccluded contralateral arm fingertip temperature responses during the FMD procedure may be an indicator of the presence of coronary artery disease. To test the hypotheses that rapid inflation of a blood pressure cuff could reduce FMD values and influence contralateral vasodilatory states, 33 apparently healthy adults (18 males and 15 females, 29±6 years) were studied in two randomized FMD trials. The blood flow-occluding cuff was inflated rapidly (<1s) in one trial or slowly over 10 s in the other trial. Arterial diameter, fingertip temperature and infrared thermography were obtained throughout each session. FMD values were not different between the rapid and slow cuff inflation trials (5.9±0.6 vs 5.9±0.4{\%}). There were no differences in reactive hyperaemia (6.4±1.6 vs 6.2±1.7AU), shear stress (80±20 vs 77±17 dyncm -2) and fingertip temperature rebound (TR; 1.8±1.2 vs 1.9±1.0 1C) between the rapid and slow inflation. Changes in finger temperature on the contralateral (non-occluded) arm were positively associated with those on the occluded arm (r=0.26 to 0.61, P<0.05). We concluded that rates of inflating a blood pressure cuff do not affect FMD and TR response, and that neurovascularinduced vasodilatation of the contralateral arm was not observed regardless of cuff inflation rates.",
keywords = "endothelium-dependent vasodilatation, opposite arm, vascular reactivity",
author = "Lin, {H. F.} and Dhindsa, {M. S.} and T. Tarumi and Miles, {S. C.} and D. Umpierre and H. Tanaka",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1038/jhh.2010.128",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "35--40",
journal = "Journal of Human Hypertension",
issn = "0950-9240",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact of blood pressure cuff inflation rates on flow-mediated dilatation and contralateral arm response

AU - Lin, H. F.

AU - Dhindsa, M. S.

AU - Tarumi, T.

AU - Miles, S. C.

AU - Umpierre, D.

AU - Tanaka, H.

PY - 2012/1/1

Y1 - 2012/1/1

N2 - Flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) is widely used as an index of nitric oxide-mediated vasodilator function, yet its methodology has not been well established. Previous research indicates that a rapid inflation of a blood pressure cuff evokes systemic vasoconstriction, as it was observed even on non-occluded contralateral arm. This would potentially contribute to the variability of FMD readings and complicate the emerging evidence that nonoccluded contralateral arm fingertip temperature responses during the FMD procedure may be an indicator of the presence of coronary artery disease. To test the hypotheses that rapid inflation of a blood pressure cuff could reduce FMD values and influence contralateral vasodilatory states, 33 apparently healthy adults (18 males and 15 females, 29±6 years) were studied in two randomized FMD trials. The blood flow-occluding cuff was inflated rapidly (<1s) in one trial or slowly over 10 s in the other trial. Arterial diameter, fingertip temperature and infrared thermography were obtained throughout each session. FMD values were not different between the rapid and slow cuff inflation trials (5.9±0.6 vs 5.9±0.4%). There were no differences in reactive hyperaemia (6.4±1.6 vs 6.2±1.7AU), shear stress (80±20 vs 77±17 dyncm -2) and fingertip temperature rebound (TR; 1.8±1.2 vs 1.9±1.0 1C) between the rapid and slow inflation. Changes in finger temperature on the contralateral (non-occluded) arm were positively associated with those on the occluded arm (r=0.26 to 0.61, P<0.05). We concluded that rates of inflating a blood pressure cuff do not affect FMD and TR response, and that neurovascularinduced vasodilatation of the contralateral arm was not observed regardless of cuff inflation rates.

AB - Flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) is widely used as an index of nitric oxide-mediated vasodilator function, yet its methodology has not been well established. Previous research indicates that a rapid inflation of a blood pressure cuff evokes systemic vasoconstriction, as it was observed even on non-occluded contralateral arm. This would potentially contribute to the variability of FMD readings and complicate the emerging evidence that nonoccluded contralateral arm fingertip temperature responses during the FMD procedure may be an indicator of the presence of coronary artery disease. To test the hypotheses that rapid inflation of a blood pressure cuff could reduce FMD values and influence contralateral vasodilatory states, 33 apparently healthy adults (18 males and 15 females, 29±6 years) were studied in two randomized FMD trials. The blood flow-occluding cuff was inflated rapidly (<1s) in one trial or slowly over 10 s in the other trial. Arterial diameter, fingertip temperature and infrared thermography were obtained throughout each session. FMD values were not different between the rapid and slow cuff inflation trials (5.9±0.6 vs 5.9±0.4%). There were no differences in reactive hyperaemia (6.4±1.6 vs 6.2±1.7AU), shear stress (80±20 vs 77±17 dyncm -2) and fingertip temperature rebound (TR; 1.8±1.2 vs 1.9±1.0 1C) between the rapid and slow inflation. Changes in finger temperature on the contralateral (non-occluded) arm were positively associated with those on the occluded arm (r=0.26 to 0.61, P<0.05). We concluded that rates of inflating a blood pressure cuff do not affect FMD and TR response, and that neurovascularinduced vasodilatation of the contralateral arm was not observed regardless of cuff inflation rates.

KW - endothelium-dependent vasodilatation

KW - opposite arm

KW - vascular reactivity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=83555163874&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=83555163874&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/jhh.2010.128

DO - 10.1038/jhh.2010.128

M3 - Article

C2 - 21248779

AN - SCOPUS:83555163874

VL - 26

SP - 35

EP - 40

JO - Journal of Human Hypertension

JF - Journal of Human Hypertension

SN - 0950-9240

IS - 1

ER -