Impact of the 2014 expert panel recommendations for management of high blood pressure on contemporary cardiovascular practice: Insights from the NCDR PINNACLE registry

William B. Borden, Thomas M. Maddox, Fengming Tang, John S. Rumsfeld, William J. Oetgen, J. Brendan Mullen, Sarah A. Spinler, Eric D. Peterson, Frederick A. Masoudi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background Since 2003, the Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee (JNC-7) has been the predominant guideline for blood pressure management. A 2014 expert panel recommended increasing the blood pressure targets for patients age 60 years and older, as well as those with diabetes or chronic kidney disease. Objectives The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of the 2014 expert panel blood pressure management recommendations on patients managed in U.S. ambulatory cardiovascular practices. Methods Using the National Cardiovascular Data Registry PINNACLE Registry, we assessed the proportion of patients who met the 2003 and 2014 panel recommendations, highlighting the populations of patients for whom the blood pressure goals changed. Results Of 1,185,253 patients in the study cohort, 706,859 (59.6%) achieved the 2003 JNC-7 goals. Using the 2014 recommendations, 880,378 (74.3%) patients were at goal. Among the 173,519 (14.6%) for whom goal achievement changed, 40,323 (23.2%) had a prior stroke or transient ischemic attack, and 112,174 (64.6%) had coronary artery disease. In addition, the average Framingham risk score in this group was 8.5 ± 3.2%, and the 10-year ASCVD risk score was 28.0 ± 19.5%. Conclusions Among U.S. ambulatory cardiology patients with hypertension, nearly 1 in 7 who did not meet JNC-7 recommendations would now meet the 2014 treatment goals. If the new recommendations are implemented in clinical practice, blood pressure target achievement and cardiovascular events will need careful monitoring, because many patients for whom the target blood pressure is now more permissive are at high cardiovascular risk.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2196-2203
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of the American College of Cardiology
Volume64
Issue number21
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2 2014
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • CAD guidelines
  • hypertension
  • prevention
  • stroke

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Impact of the 2014 expert panel recommendations for management of high blood pressure on contemporary cardiovascular practice: Insights from the NCDR PINNACLE registry'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this