Implementation of a prehospital air medical thawed plasma program: Is it even feasible?

PAMPer study group

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Prehospital Air Medical Plasma (PAMPer) trial demonstrated a 30-day survival benefit among hypotensive trauma patients treated with prehospital plasma during air medical transport. We characterized resources, costs and feasibility of air medical prehospital plasma program implementation. METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis using data derived from the recent PAMPer trial. Intervention patients received thawed plasma (5-day shelf life). Unused plasma units were recycled back to blood bank affiliates, when possible. Distribution method and capability of recycling varied across sites. We determined the status of plasma units deployed, utilized, wasted, and returned. We inventoried thawed plasma use and annualized costs for distribution and recovery. RESULTS: The PAMPer trial screened 7,275 patients and 5,103 plasma units were deployed across 22 air medical bases during a 42-month period. Only 368 (7.2%) units of this total thawed plasma pool were provided to plasma randomized PAMPer patients. Of the total plasma pool, 3,716 (72.8%) units of plasma were returned to the blood bank with the potential for transfusion prior to expiration and 1,019 (20.0%) thawed plasma units were deemed wasted for this analysis. The estimated average annual cost of implementation of a thawed plasma program per air medical base at an average courier distance would be between US $24,343 and US $30,077, depending on the ability to recycle plasma and distance of courier delivery required. CONCLUSION: A prehospital plasma program utilizing thawed plasma is resource intensive. Plasma waste can be minimized depending on trauma center and blood bank specific logistics. Implementation of a thawed plasma program can occur with financial cost. Products with a longer shelf life, such as liquid plasma or freeze-dried plasma, may provide a more cost-effective prehospital product relative to thawed plasma. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, level III.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1077-1081
Number of pages5
JournalThe journal of trauma and acute care surgery
Volume87
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2019

Fingerprint

Air
Blood Banks
Costs and Cost Analysis
Trauma Centers
Recycling

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Implementation of a prehospital air medical thawed plasma program : Is it even feasible? / PAMPer study group.

In: The journal of trauma and acute care surgery, Vol. 87, No. 5, 01.11.2019, p. 1077-1081.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{adc4d1e06b2f43f595917f3e40b2e28c,
title = "Implementation of a prehospital air medical thawed plasma program: Is it even feasible?",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: The Prehospital Air Medical Plasma (PAMPer) trial demonstrated a 30-day survival benefit among hypotensive trauma patients treated with prehospital plasma during air medical transport. We characterized resources, costs and feasibility of air medical prehospital plasma program implementation. METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis using data derived from the recent PAMPer trial. Intervention patients received thawed plasma (5-day shelf life). Unused plasma units were recycled back to blood bank affiliates, when possible. Distribution method and capability of recycling varied across sites. We determined the status of plasma units deployed, utilized, wasted, and returned. We inventoried thawed plasma use and annualized costs for distribution and recovery. RESULTS: The PAMPer trial screened 7,275 patients and 5,103 plasma units were deployed across 22 air medical bases during a 42-month period. Only 368 (7.2{\%}) units of this total thawed plasma pool were provided to plasma randomized PAMPer patients. Of the total plasma pool, 3,716 (72.8{\%}) units of plasma were returned to the blood bank with the potential for transfusion prior to expiration and 1,019 (20.0{\%}) thawed plasma units were deemed wasted for this analysis. The estimated average annual cost of implementation of a thawed plasma program per air medical base at an average courier distance would be between US $24,343 and US $30,077, depending on the ability to recycle plasma and distance of courier delivery required. CONCLUSION: A prehospital plasma program utilizing thawed plasma is resource intensive. Plasma waste can be minimized depending on trauma center and blood bank specific logistics. Implementation of a thawed plasma program can occur with financial cost. Products with a longer shelf life, such as liquid plasma or freeze-dried plasma, may provide a more cost-effective prehospital product relative to thawed plasma. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, level III.",
author = "{PAMPer study group} and Adams, {Peter W.} and Warren, {Kayla A.} and Guyette, {Frank X.} and Yazer, {Mark H.} and Brown, {Joshua B.} and Daily, {Brian J.} and Miller, {Richard S.} and Harbrecht, {Brain G.} and Claridge, {Jeffrey A.} and Phelan, {Herb A.} and Witham, {William R.} and Putnam, {A. Tyler} and Zuckerbraun, {Brian S.} and Neal, {Matthew D.} and Sperry, {Jason L.}",
year = "2019",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/TA.0000000000002406",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "87",
pages = "1077--1081",
journal = "Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery",
issn = "2163-0755",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Implementation of a prehospital air medical thawed plasma program

T2 - Is it even feasible?

AU - PAMPer study group

AU - Adams, Peter W.

AU - Warren, Kayla A.

AU - Guyette, Frank X.

AU - Yazer, Mark H.

AU - Brown, Joshua B.

AU - Daily, Brian J.

AU - Miller, Richard S.

AU - Harbrecht, Brain G.

AU - Claridge, Jeffrey A.

AU - Phelan, Herb A.

AU - Witham, William R.

AU - Putnam, A. Tyler

AU - Zuckerbraun, Brian S.

AU - Neal, Matthew D.

AU - Sperry, Jason L.

PY - 2019/11/1

Y1 - 2019/11/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: The Prehospital Air Medical Plasma (PAMPer) trial demonstrated a 30-day survival benefit among hypotensive trauma patients treated with prehospital plasma during air medical transport. We characterized resources, costs and feasibility of air medical prehospital plasma program implementation. METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis using data derived from the recent PAMPer trial. Intervention patients received thawed plasma (5-day shelf life). Unused plasma units were recycled back to blood bank affiliates, when possible. Distribution method and capability of recycling varied across sites. We determined the status of plasma units deployed, utilized, wasted, and returned. We inventoried thawed plasma use and annualized costs for distribution and recovery. RESULTS: The PAMPer trial screened 7,275 patients and 5,103 plasma units were deployed across 22 air medical bases during a 42-month period. Only 368 (7.2%) units of this total thawed plasma pool were provided to plasma randomized PAMPer patients. Of the total plasma pool, 3,716 (72.8%) units of plasma were returned to the blood bank with the potential for transfusion prior to expiration and 1,019 (20.0%) thawed plasma units were deemed wasted for this analysis. The estimated average annual cost of implementation of a thawed plasma program per air medical base at an average courier distance would be between US $24,343 and US $30,077, depending on the ability to recycle plasma and distance of courier delivery required. CONCLUSION: A prehospital plasma program utilizing thawed plasma is resource intensive. Plasma waste can be minimized depending on trauma center and blood bank specific logistics. Implementation of a thawed plasma program can occur with financial cost. Products with a longer shelf life, such as liquid plasma or freeze-dried plasma, may provide a more cost-effective prehospital product relative to thawed plasma. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, level III.

AB - BACKGROUND: The Prehospital Air Medical Plasma (PAMPer) trial demonstrated a 30-day survival benefit among hypotensive trauma patients treated with prehospital plasma during air medical transport. We characterized resources, costs and feasibility of air medical prehospital plasma program implementation. METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis using data derived from the recent PAMPer trial. Intervention patients received thawed plasma (5-day shelf life). Unused plasma units were recycled back to blood bank affiliates, when possible. Distribution method and capability of recycling varied across sites. We determined the status of plasma units deployed, utilized, wasted, and returned. We inventoried thawed plasma use and annualized costs for distribution and recovery. RESULTS: The PAMPer trial screened 7,275 patients and 5,103 plasma units were deployed across 22 air medical bases during a 42-month period. Only 368 (7.2%) units of this total thawed plasma pool were provided to plasma randomized PAMPer patients. Of the total plasma pool, 3,716 (72.8%) units of plasma were returned to the blood bank with the potential for transfusion prior to expiration and 1,019 (20.0%) thawed plasma units were deemed wasted for this analysis. The estimated average annual cost of implementation of a thawed plasma program per air medical base at an average courier distance would be between US $24,343 and US $30,077, depending on the ability to recycle plasma and distance of courier delivery required. CONCLUSION: A prehospital plasma program utilizing thawed plasma is resource intensive. Plasma waste can be minimized depending on trauma center and blood bank specific logistics. Implementation of a thawed plasma program can occur with financial cost. Products with a longer shelf life, such as liquid plasma or freeze-dried plasma, may provide a more cost-effective prehospital product relative to thawed plasma. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, level III.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074184342&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85074184342&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/TA.0000000000002406

DO - 10.1097/TA.0000000000002406

M3 - Article

C2 - 31205211

AN - SCOPUS:85074184342

VL - 87

SP - 1077

EP - 1081

JO - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

JF - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

SN - 2163-0755

IS - 5

ER -