Implicit theories of personality and attributions of hostile intent: A meta-analysis, an experiment, and a longitudinal intervention

David S. Yeager, Adriana S. Miu, Joseph Powers, Carol S. Dweck

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

60 Scopus citations

Abstract

Past research has shown that hostile schemas and adverse experiences predict the hostile attributional bias. This research proposes that seemingly nonhostile beliefs (implicit theories about the malleability of personality) may also play a role in shaping it. Study 1 meta-analytically summarized 11 original tests of this hypothesis (N = 1,659), and showed that among diverse adolescents aged 13-16 a fixed or entity theory about personality traits predicted greater hostile attributional biases, which mediated an effect on aggressive desires. Study 2 experimentally changed adolescents' implicit theories toward a malleable or incremental view and showed a reduction in hostile intent attributions. Study 3 delivered an incremental theory intervention that reduced hostile intent attributions and aggressive desires over an 8-month period.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1651-1667
Number of pages17
JournalChild development
Volume84
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 1 2013
Externally publishedYes

    Fingerprint

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Education
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this