Inclusion and assessment criteria for conservative scoliosis treatment.

George H. Thompson, B. Stephens Richards

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The efficacy of brace or conservative treatment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis is controversial due to variations in inclusion and assessment criteria. This makes the interpretation of brace studies and their comparisons difficult. The Scoliosis Research Society recently introduced new standardized inclusion and assessment criteria for future brace studies. The inclusion criteria include: age 10 years or older at initiation of bracing, Risser sign 0-2, primary curve magnitude 25 to 40 degrees, no prior treatment, and females either premenarche or less than one year post-menarche. The assessment criteria include: percentage of patients with < or = 5 degree curve progression and percentage of patients with > or = 6 degree curve progression at skeletal maturity, percentage of patients who had surgery or recommended before skeletal maturity, percentage of patients with curves exceeding 45 degrees at maturity, and a minimum of 2 years follow-up beyond skeletal maturity for those patients felt to have been successfully treated. All patients treated irregardless of compliance are to be included in the results (intent to treat).The use of these criteria should assist in the determination of the effectiveness of brace treatment, as well as accurate comparison between patient groups and different braces.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)157-163
Number of pages7
JournalStudies in Health Technology and Informatics
Volume135
StatePublished - 2008

Fingerprint

Scoliosis
Braces
Surgery
Menarche
Compliance
Conservative Treatment
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Health Informatics
  • Health Information Management

Cite this

Inclusion and assessment criteria for conservative scoliosis treatment. / Thompson, George H.; Richards, B. Stephens.

In: Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, Vol. 135, 2008, p. 157-163.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2fd452c3edab490b9789527ef8c042fc,
title = "Inclusion and assessment criteria for conservative scoliosis treatment.",
abstract = "The efficacy of brace or conservative treatment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis is controversial due to variations in inclusion and assessment criteria. This makes the interpretation of brace studies and their comparisons difficult. The Scoliosis Research Society recently introduced new standardized inclusion and assessment criteria for future brace studies. The inclusion criteria include: age 10 years or older at initiation of bracing, Risser sign 0-2, primary curve magnitude 25 to 40 degrees, no prior treatment, and females either premenarche or less than one year post-menarche. The assessment criteria include: percentage of patients with < or = 5 degree curve progression and percentage of patients with > or = 6 degree curve progression at skeletal maturity, percentage of patients who had surgery or recommended before skeletal maturity, percentage of patients with curves exceeding 45 degrees at maturity, and a minimum of 2 years follow-up beyond skeletal maturity for those patients felt to have been successfully treated. All patients treated irregardless of compliance are to be included in the results (intent to treat).The use of these criteria should assist in the determination of the effectiveness of brace treatment, as well as accurate comparison between patient groups and different braces.",
author = "Thompson, {George H.} and Richards, {B. Stephens}",
year = "2008",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "135",
pages = "157--163",
journal = "Studies in Health Technology and Informatics",
issn = "0926-9630",
publisher = "IOS Press",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Inclusion and assessment criteria for conservative scoliosis treatment.

AU - Thompson, George H.

AU - Richards, B. Stephens

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - The efficacy of brace or conservative treatment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis is controversial due to variations in inclusion and assessment criteria. This makes the interpretation of brace studies and their comparisons difficult. The Scoliosis Research Society recently introduced new standardized inclusion and assessment criteria for future brace studies. The inclusion criteria include: age 10 years or older at initiation of bracing, Risser sign 0-2, primary curve magnitude 25 to 40 degrees, no prior treatment, and females either premenarche or less than one year post-menarche. The assessment criteria include: percentage of patients with < or = 5 degree curve progression and percentage of patients with > or = 6 degree curve progression at skeletal maturity, percentage of patients who had surgery or recommended before skeletal maturity, percentage of patients with curves exceeding 45 degrees at maturity, and a minimum of 2 years follow-up beyond skeletal maturity for those patients felt to have been successfully treated. All patients treated irregardless of compliance are to be included in the results (intent to treat).The use of these criteria should assist in the determination of the effectiveness of brace treatment, as well as accurate comparison between patient groups and different braces.

AB - The efficacy of brace or conservative treatment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis is controversial due to variations in inclusion and assessment criteria. This makes the interpretation of brace studies and their comparisons difficult. The Scoliosis Research Society recently introduced new standardized inclusion and assessment criteria for future brace studies. The inclusion criteria include: age 10 years or older at initiation of bracing, Risser sign 0-2, primary curve magnitude 25 to 40 degrees, no prior treatment, and females either premenarche or less than one year post-menarche. The assessment criteria include: percentage of patients with < or = 5 degree curve progression and percentage of patients with > or = 6 degree curve progression at skeletal maturity, percentage of patients who had surgery or recommended before skeletal maturity, percentage of patients with curves exceeding 45 degrees at maturity, and a minimum of 2 years follow-up beyond skeletal maturity for those patients felt to have been successfully treated. All patients treated irregardless of compliance are to be included in the results (intent to treat).The use of these criteria should assist in the determination of the effectiveness of brace treatment, as well as accurate comparison between patient groups and different braces.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=45149092752&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=45149092752&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 135

SP - 157

EP - 163

JO - Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

JF - Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

SN - 0926-9630

ER -