Independent state health surveys

Responding to the need for local population health data

Barry Portnoy, Simon J. Craddock Lee, Jennifer Kincheloe, Nancy Breen, Jean L. Olson, Judy McCormally, E. Richard Brown

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Context: There is high demand for local-level population health data. A national system of state and local data collection would help improve both population health and health care delivery. The primary source of state-level population health data for adults is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. However, many states need data on children and adolescents, racial and ethnic subpopulations, consistent estimates for localities, or more in-depth information on key topics than the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System provides. Eleven state health surveys (SHSs) have emerged in an effort to address these gaps. Design: Semistructured telephone interviews were conducted in 2009 with representatives of 9 SHSs. The interviews were recorded, and data were transcribed, organized, and analyzed according to the query structure. This analysis identified (1) the core elements of SHS that have been successful in meeting needs for local data and (2) the processes and strategies used by state officials in creating these surveys. Results: Key findings include the following: (1) SHSs provide concrete data on local health issues that meet the needs of policy makers who wish to adopt evidence-based public health policies; (2) data from SHSs allow researchers to identify issues, apply for grants, and evaluate, assess, and track health indicators; (3) a "champion" is required to build the case for a survey and push through barriers to obtain funding and stakeholder buy-in; and (4) SHSs face challenges such as inconsistent funding and lack of uniform standards. Conclusion: Opportunities to support SHSs include (1) identifying sustained funding sources; (2) providing technical assistance and facilitating training to foster best practices, quality standards, and comparability across states; and (3) supporting an organization for SHS researchers to share resources, information, and experiences.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Public Health Management and Practice
Volume20
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Health Surveys
Health
Population
Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Health Status
Research Personnel
Interviews
Organized Financing
Public Policy
Health Policy
Administrative Personnel
Practice Guidelines
Public Health
Organizations
Delivery of Health Care

Keywords

  • Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
  • community health needs assessment
  • evidence-based policy
  • health care reform
  • health surveys
  • independent state health
  • population health surveillance
  • state health surveys
  • surveys

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health Policy

Cite this

Independent state health surveys : Responding to the need for local population health data. / Portnoy, Barry; Craddock Lee, Simon J.; Kincheloe, Jennifer; Breen, Nancy; Olson, Jean L.; McCormally, Judy; Brown, E. Richard.

In: Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, Vol. 20, No. 5, 2014.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Portnoy, Barry ; Craddock Lee, Simon J. ; Kincheloe, Jennifer ; Breen, Nancy ; Olson, Jean L. ; McCormally, Judy ; Brown, E. Richard. / Independent state health surveys : Responding to the need for local population health data. In: Journal of Public Health Management and Practice. 2014 ; Vol. 20, No. 5.
@article{91c5a661f49a4a7ab185cc7fefe89ca2,
title = "Independent state health surveys: Responding to the need for local population health data",
abstract = "Context: There is high demand for local-level population health data. A national system of state and local data collection would help improve both population health and health care delivery. The primary source of state-level population health data for adults is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. However, many states need data on children and adolescents, racial and ethnic subpopulations, consistent estimates for localities, or more in-depth information on key topics than the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System provides. Eleven state health surveys (SHSs) have emerged in an effort to address these gaps. Design: Semistructured telephone interviews were conducted in 2009 with representatives of 9 SHSs. The interviews were recorded, and data were transcribed, organized, and analyzed according to the query structure. This analysis identified (1) the core elements of SHS that have been successful in meeting needs for local data and (2) the processes and strategies used by state officials in creating these surveys. Results: Key findings include the following: (1) SHSs provide concrete data on local health issues that meet the needs of policy makers who wish to adopt evidence-based public health policies; (2) data from SHSs allow researchers to identify issues, apply for grants, and evaluate, assess, and track health indicators; (3) a {"}champion{"} is required to build the case for a survey and push through barriers to obtain funding and stakeholder buy-in; and (4) SHSs face challenges such as inconsistent funding and lack of uniform standards. Conclusion: Opportunities to support SHSs include (1) identifying sustained funding sources; (2) providing technical assistance and facilitating training to foster best practices, quality standards, and comparability across states; and (3) supporting an organization for SHS researchers to share resources, information, and experiences.",
keywords = "Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, community health needs assessment, evidence-based policy, health care reform, health surveys, independent state health, population health surveillance, state health surveys, surveys",
author = "Barry Portnoy and {Craddock Lee}, {Simon J.} and Jennifer Kincheloe and Nancy Breen and Olson, {Jean L.} and Judy McCormally and Brown, {E. Richard}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1097/PHH.0b013e3182a9c0ce",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
journal = "Journal of Public Health Management and Practice",
issn = "1078-4659",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Independent state health surveys

T2 - Responding to the need for local population health data

AU - Portnoy, Barry

AU - Craddock Lee, Simon J.

AU - Kincheloe, Jennifer

AU - Breen, Nancy

AU - Olson, Jean L.

AU - McCormally, Judy

AU - Brown, E. Richard

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Context: There is high demand for local-level population health data. A national system of state and local data collection would help improve both population health and health care delivery. The primary source of state-level population health data for adults is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. However, many states need data on children and adolescents, racial and ethnic subpopulations, consistent estimates for localities, or more in-depth information on key topics than the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System provides. Eleven state health surveys (SHSs) have emerged in an effort to address these gaps. Design: Semistructured telephone interviews were conducted in 2009 with representatives of 9 SHSs. The interviews were recorded, and data were transcribed, organized, and analyzed according to the query structure. This analysis identified (1) the core elements of SHS that have been successful in meeting needs for local data and (2) the processes and strategies used by state officials in creating these surveys. Results: Key findings include the following: (1) SHSs provide concrete data on local health issues that meet the needs of policy makers who wish to adopt evidence-based public health policies; (2) data from SHSs allow researchers to identify issues, apply for grants, and evaluate, assess, and track health indicators; (3) a "champion" is required to build the case for a survey and push through barriers to obtain funding and stakeholder buy-in; and (4) SHSs face challenges such as inconsistent funding and lack of uniform standards. Conclusion: Opportunities to support SHSs include (1) identifying sustained funding sources; (2) providing technical assistance and facilitating training to foster best practices, quality standards, and comparability across states; and (3) supporting an organization for SHS researchers to share resources, information, and experiences.

AB - Context: There is high demand for local-level population health data. A national system of state and local data collection would help improve both population health and health care delivery. The primary source of state-level population health data for adults is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. However, many states need data on children and adolescents, racial and ethnic subpopulations, consistent estimates for localities, or more in-depth information on key topics than the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System provides. Eleven state health surveys (SHSs) have emerged in an effort to address these gaps. Design: Semistructured telephone interviews were conducted in 2009 with representatives of 9 SHSs. The interviews were recorded, and data were transcribed, organized, and analyzed according to the query structure. This analysis identified (1) the core elements of SHS that have been successful in meeting needs for local data and (2) the processes and strategies used by state officials in creating these surveys. Results: Key findings include the following: (1) SHSs provide concrete data on local health issues that meet the needs of policy makers who wish to adopt evidence-based public health policies; (2) data from SHSs allow researchers to identify issues, apply for grants, and evaluate, assess, and track health indicators; (3) a "champion" is required to build the case for a survey and push through barriers to obtain funding and stakeholder buy-in; and (4) SHSs face challenges such as inconsistent funding and lack of uniform standards. Conclusion: Opportunities to support SHSs include (1) identifying sustained funding sources; (2) providing technical assistance and facilitating training to foster best practices, quality standards, and comparability across states; and (3) supporting an organization for SHS researchers to share resources, information, and experiences.

KW - Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System

KW - community health needs assessment

KW - evidence-based policy

KW - health care reform

KW - health surveys

KW - independent state health

KW - population health surveillance

KW - state health surveys

KW - surveys

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84904977199&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84904977199&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/PHH.0b013e3182a9c0ce

DO - 10.1097/PHH.0b013e3182a9c0ce

M3 - Article

VL - 20

JO - Journal of Public Health Management and Practice

JF - Journal of Public Health Management and Practice

SN - 1078-4659

IS - 5

ER -