TY - JOUR
T1 - Influence of endoscopic biopsy forceps characteristics on tissue specimens
T2 - Results of a prospective randomized study
AU - Woods, K. L.
AU - Anand, B. S.
AU - Cole, R. A.
AU - Osato, M. S.
AU - Genta, R. M.
AU - Malaty, H.
AU - Gurer, I. E.
AU - De Rossi, D.
N1 - Funding Information:
Supported in part by a research grant from the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.
PY - 1999
Y1 - 1999
N2 - Background: A large variety of endoscopic biopsy forceps are commercially available. However, little is known regarding the influence of forceps characteristics such as disposability, size, shape, and presence of a needle on the adequacy of the specimens for histologic diagnosis. Our aim was to analyze in a prospective, randomized, pathologist-blinded study the performance of different biopsy forceps. Methods: Twelve biopsy forceps were tested, 6 each at upper endoscopy and colonoscopy. Two biopsy specimens were obtained with each forceps, for a total of 12 specimens per patient. The tissue samples were examined for the following parameters: weight (mg), size (mm3), depth, crush artifact, sheering effect, and adequacy of the specimens for histologic information (0 = inadequate, 1 = suboptimal, and 2 = adequate). Results: Fifty-five patients undergoing routine upper or lower gastrointestinal endoscopy were included in the study, and a total of 624 tissue samples were available for analysis. Overall, disposable forceps provided specimens of greater size and depth. At upper endoscopy, alligator- shaped forceps improved the depth of the sample as did the absence of a needle within the cup. These factors, however, had no impact on the specimens obtained at colonoscopy. When the adequacy of the specimens was assessed for histologic diagnosis, no significant difference was noted between any of the individual forceps, although collectively oval-shaped forceps were superior to alligator-shaped forceps at colonoscopy. Conclusions: The biopsy forceps currently available in the market are equally efficient in providing histologic diagnosis. The primary consideration when selecting an endoscopic biopsy forceps, therefore, should be the cost and ease of use and not any perceived advantage in performance.
AB - Background: A large variety of endoscopic biopsy forceps are commercially available. However, little is known regarding the influence of forceps characteristics such as disposability, size, shape, and presence of a needle on the adequacy of the specimens for histologic diagnosis. Our aim was to analyze in a prospective, randomized, pathologist-blinded study the performance of different biopsy forceps. Methods: Twelve biopsy forceps were tested, 6 each at upper endoscopy and colonoscopy. Two biopsy specimens were obtained with each forceps, for a total of 12 specimens per patient. The tissue samples were examined for the following parameters: weight (mg), size (mm3), depth, crush artifact, sheering effect, and adequacy of the specimens for histologic information (0 = inadequate, 1 = suboptimal, and 2 = adequate). Results: Fifty-five patients undergoing routine upper or lower gastrointestinal endoscopy were included in the study, and a total of 624 tissue samples were available for analysis. Overall, disposable forceps provided specimens of greater size and depth. At upper endoscopy, alligator- shaped forceps improved the depth of the sample as did the absence of a needle within the cup. These factors, however, had no impact on the specimens obtained at colonoscopy. When the adequacy of the specimens was assessed for histologic diagnosis, no significant difference was noted between any of the individual forceps, although collectively oval-shaped forceps were superior to alligator-shaped forceps at colonoscopy. Conclusions: The biopsy forceps currently available in the market are equally efficient in providing histologic diagnosis. The primary consideration when selecting an endoscopic biopsy forceps, therefore, should be the cost and ease of use and not any perceived advantage in performance.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033049921&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033049921&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0016-5107(99)70483-9
DO - 10.1016/S0016-5107(99)70483-9
M3 - Article
C2 - 9925695
AN - SCOPUS:0033049921
SN - 0016-5107
VL - 49
SP - 177
EP - 183
JO - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
JF - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
IS - 2
ER -